Bozkurt M.B.Serın B.2024-07-222024-07-22202113003453http://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/13565In this study, dynamic performance of six chevron and split-X braced concentrically braced frames (CBFs) having 3, 6 and 9 number of stories designed as per Turkish Seismic Code 2007 (TSC-2007) and Turkish Seismic Code for Buildings 2018 (TSCB-2018) were compared. By using Opensees software, a total of 1056 nonlinear time history analyses was conducted under 44 far-field ground motions scaled based on TSC-2007 and TSCB-2018 by considering maximum considered earthquake having a 2% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. The results indicate that the archetypes designed as per TSCB-2018 are more reliable in CBFs employing both chevron and split-X brace configuration. © 2021 Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved.TurkishAll Open Access; Gold Open AccessStructural framesAND splitsChevron bracesConcentrically braced framesDynamic performanceSplit-X braceTurkish seismic code 2007Turkish seismic code for building 2018Turkish seismic codesUnbalanced forceSeismologyArticle10.18400/tekderg.620816