Ulusoy A.Cerrahoglu L.Orguc S.2024-07-222024-07-22201710672516http://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/15369We determined and compared the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT), therapeutic ultrasound (US) therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed a randomized, prospective, comparative clinical study. A total of 60 patients with a diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis were divided randomly into 3 treatment groups: group 1 underwent 15 sessions of LLLT (8 J/cm2; 830 nm); group 2 underwent 15 sessions of continuous US (1 mHz; 2 W/cm2); and group 3 underwent 3 sessions of ESWT (2000 shocks). All patients were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), heel tenderness index (HTI), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, Roles–Maudsley score, and MRI before and 1 month after treatment. The primary efficacy success criterion was the percentage of decrease in heel pain of >60% from baseline at 1 month after treatment for ≥2 of the 3 heel pain (VAS) measurements. Significant improvement was measured using the mean VAS, AOFAS scale, and HTI scores for all 3 groups. The thickness of the plantar fascia had decreased significantly on MRI in all 3 groups. The treatment success rate was 70.6% in the LLLT group, 65% in the ESWT group, and 23.5% in the US group. LLLT and ESWT proved significantly superior to US therapy using the primary efficacy criterion (p =.006 and p =.012, respectively), with no significant difference between the LLLT and ESWT groups (p >.05). The treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with LLLT and ESWT resulted in similar outcomes and both were more successful than US therapy in pain improvement and functional outcomes. © 2017 American College of Foot and Ankle SurgeonsEnglishAdultAgedChronic DiseaseExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyFasciitis, PlantarFemaleHigh-Energy Shock WavesHumansLow-Level Light TherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultnonsteroid antiinflammatory agentadultagedAmerican Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot scaleArticlebone marrow edemaclinical effectivenesscontrolled studyextracorporeal shock wave therapyfemalefollow upfoot orthosisfunctional assessmentheel painheel tenderness indexhome physiotherapyhumanintermethod comparisonlow level laser therapymajor clinical studymalemusculoskeletal disease assessmentmusculoskeletal system parametersnuclear magnetic resonance imagingnuclear magnetic resonance scanneroutcome assessmentplantar fasciitisprospective studyrandomized controlled trialRoles Maudsley scoreshock wave generatorshock wave therapysoft tissue diseasesoft tissue edematherapy effecttreatment durationtreatment responseultrasound therapyvisual analog scalechronic diseasecomparative studydiagnostic imaginghigh-energy shock wavemiddle agedplantar fasciitistreatment outcomeyoung adultArticle10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.013