Browsing by Author "Çelik, Ö"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of anxiety levels during intracavitary brachytherapy applications in women with gynecological malignancies
    Kamer, S; Özsaran, Z; Çelik, Ö; Bildik, O; Yalman, D; Bölükbasi, Y; Haydaroglu, A
    Purpose: To evaluate the anxiety levels of women treated for gynecological malignancies using intracavitary brachytherapy. Methods: Anxiety levels prior to and after intracavitary brachytherapy application and factors influencing anxiety levels were evaluated. Women were evaluated for quality of life and psychological status before each brachytherapy application using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Scores were grouped as follows: 0-7 = normal, 8-10 = borderline, 11-21 = abnormal. Women were also questioned about other factors which could affect anxiety levels such as marital status, education level, number of pregnancies and prior surgical history. Results: Between January 2003 and August 2004, 146 women with a median age of 56 years were evaluated (range: 27-80). Eighty-six women had cervix uteri carcinoma and 63 had endometrial carcinoma. Sixty-seven women were premenopausal and 85 women were postmenopausal. The median pregnancy number was three (range = 0-10). Eighty-nine women had at least three children. Sixty-seven women had had previous operations. One hundred and twenty-five women were married and 24 women were unmarried or widowed. Before treatment, the anxiety scores were scored as normal in 49 (32%), borderline in 41 (28%), and abnormal in 59 (40%). Anxiety levels were lower in 69 women during the last application as compared with the pretreatment levels (p = 0.00). Marital status and pregnancy number showed a significant correlation with anxiety scores (p = 0.04). Age, level of education or having had a previous operation showed no significant correlation with anxiety level. Conclusion: These results indicate that intracavitary brachytherapy is associated with anxiety. Women need to be given detailed information before the brachytherapy application to reduce anxiety. Additional studies are needed to determine it.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Prevalence and predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus: a nationwide multicentre prospective study
    Aydin, H; Çelik, Ö; Yazici, D; Altunok, Ç; Tarçin, Ö; Deyneli, O; Sancak, S; Kiyici, S; Aydin, K; Yildiz, BO; Çakiroglu, AY; Özer, A; Tuzcu, AK; Kan, A; Çelik, A; Uysal, A; Atmaca, A; Evren, B; Taskiran, B; Bilir, BE; Duran, C; Arpaci, D; Tüzün, D; Kavak, EÇ; Aydeniz, E; Akbas, EM; Üstünyurt, E; Bil, E; Güney, E; Akbaba, E; Gürkan, E; Çagliyan, E; Karakiliç, E; Karakas, E; Kilinç, F; Söylemez, F; Küçükler, FK; Yorulmaz, G; Akbaba, G; Uysal, G; Kurt, G; Yaylali, GF; Selimoglu, H; Sari, H; Piskinpasa, H; Çelik, H; Peynirci, H; Bilal, I; Sahin, I; Gözükara, I; Anaforoglu, I; Senyuva, I; Ugur, K; Dogan, K; Keskin, L; Mert, M; Adas, M; Tonguç, M; Eroglu, M; Kulaksizoglu, M; Özcan, M; Çinar, N; Kutbay, NÖ; Dikbas, O; Bakiner, O; Turhan, ÖT; Tütüncüoglu, P; Sari, R; Melekoglu, R; Ayaz, R; Emral, R; Mumusoglu, S; Görar, S; Keskek, SÖ; Tosun, SA; Çetinkaya, SE; Temizkan, S; Ünsal, S; Demir, T; Yüce, T; Aksoy, Ü; Çinkir, Ü; Simsek, Y; Uyar, Y; Türk, Y; Pekkolay, Z; Hekimsoy, Z; Cantürk, Z; Üç, ZA
    Aim Prevalence rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) show considerable variation among different countries and regions of the world. The primary aim of this study was to determine the nationwide prevalence and predictors of GDM in Turkey. Methods We conducted prospective nationwide screening among pregnant women. Between August 2016 and November 2017, a total of 2643 pregnant women from 51 centres in 12 different regions were enrolled. A two-step screening method and Carpenter and Coustan criteria were used in the diagnosis of GDM. Clinical and biochemical data were obtained using electronic database software. Results The national prevalence of GDM was found to be 16.2% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 15.0% to 17.4%] without a significant difference between urban and rural regions. Women with GDM were older (mean age: 32 +/- 5 vs. 28 +/- 5 years, P < 0.001) and heavier (mean BMI: 27.2 +/- 5.1 vs. 24.7 +/- 4.7 kg/m(2), P < 0.001) than their counterparts without GDM. The prevalence of GDM tended to increase with age (< 25 years, 6.9%; 26-35 years, 15.6%; and 36-45 years, 32.7%; P < 0.001). Maternal age, maternal BMI, history of previous GDM and family history of diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of developing GDM (P < 0.05 for all). Low-risk women (age < 25 years, BMI < 25 kg/m(2), no family history of diabetes) comprised 10.7% of the total population and the prevalence of GDM in these women was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4% to 7.8%). Conclusion The results of this nationwide study indicate that GDM is very common, affecting one in seven pregnancies in Turkey. Implementation of international guidelines on screening and management of this public health problem is required.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Assessment of Proportion of Hidden Patients Having Symptoms of Overactive Bladder and Why Has It Been Hidden in Female Outpatients Admitted to Hospital
    Üçer, O; Demir, Ö; Zeren, MF; Ceylan, Y; Çelen, I; Zümrütbas, AE; Temeltas, G; Bozkurt, O; Günlüsoy, B; Çelik, Ö; Ekin, G; Mertoglu, O
    Purpose: To determine the proportion of patients with undetected symptoms of overactive bladder by using the overactive bladder-validated 8 (OAB-V8) screening questionnaire and investigate these symptoms were undetected in female patients who were hospitalized. Methods: We invited 2,250 female patients hospitalized in the Aegean region of Turkey to answer a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions on evidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (OAB-V8), relevant medical history, and demographic data. Patients with a total OAB-V8 score >= 8 were defined as having OAB symptoms. Results: The proportion of patients with OAB symptoms in this study was 40.6%. Nearly 57% of the patients with OAB symptoms had not been previously admitted to any hospital for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The two most common reasons why women with OAB symptoms did not admit themselves to a hospital because of LUTS were as follows: I did not think I had a disease and The symptoms did not bother me, with a response rate of 74.7%. The mean OAB-V8 scores of the patients with these two responses were significantly lower than those of the other patients (P<0.001). Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate a significant proportion of women with undetected OAB symptoms. The main reasons the women did not admit themselves to a hospital were their unawareness of the disease and because the LUTS were not bothersome. Public awareness programs on this disease may resolve this problem.