Browsing by Author "Özdemir R."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?
    (BioMed Central Ltd., 2015) Özdemir R.; Rao C.; Öcek Z.; Dinç Horasan G.
    Background: The Turkish government has implemented several reforms to improve the Turkish Statistical Institute Death Reporting System (TURKSTAT-DRS) since 2009. However, there has been no assessment to evaluate the impact of these reforms on causes of death statistics. This study attempted to analyse the impact of these reforms on the TURKSTAT-DRS for Turkey, and in the case of Izmir, one of the most developed provinces in Turkey. Methods: The evaluation framework comprised three main components each with specific criteria. Firstly, data from TURKSTAT for Turkey and Izmir for the periods 2001-2008 and 2009-2013 were assessed in terms of the following dimensions that represent quality of mortality statistics (a. completeness of death registration, b. trends in proportions of deaths with ill-defined causes). Secondly, the quality of information recorded on individual death certificates from Izmir in 2010 was analysed for a. missing information, b. timeliness of death notifications and c. characteristics of deaths with ill-defined causes. Finally, TURKSTAT data were analysed to estimate life tables and summary mortality indicators for Turkey and Izmir, as well as the leading causes-of-death in Turkey in 2013. Results: Registration of adult deaths in Izmir as well as at the national level for Turkey has considerably improved since the introduction of reforms in 2009, along with marked decline in the proportions of deaths assigned ill-defined causes. Death certificates from Izmir indicated significant gaps in recorded information for demographic as well as epidemiological variables, particularly for infant deaths, and in the detailed recording of causes of death. Life expectancy at birth estimated from local data is 3-4 years higher than similar estimates for Turkey from international studies, and this requires further investigation and confirmation. Conclusion: The TURKSTAT-DRS is now an improved source of mortality and cause of death statistics for Turkey. The reliability and validity of TURKSTAT data needs to be established through a detailed research program to evaluate completeness of death registration and validity of registered causes of death. Similar evaluation and data analysis of mortality indicators is required at regular intervals at national and sub-national level, to increase confidence in their utility as primary data for epidemiology and health policy. © 2015 Ozdemir et al.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    An evaluation of cause-of-death trends from recent decades based on registered deaths in Turkey
    (Elsevier B.V., 2017) Özdemir R.; Dinç Horasan G.; Rao C.; Sözmen M.K.; Ünal B.
    Objectives Although cause-of-death analyses are very important to define public health policy priorities and to evaluate health programs, there is very limited knowledge about mortality profiles and trends in Turkey. The aim of this study was to measure the trends in mortality within three broad cause-of-death groups and their distribution by age groups and gender and to describe the changes of leading causes of death between 1980 and 2013 in Turkey. Study design Descriptive study. Methods In the study, data on the number of deaths by year, gender, age and cause was obtained from the Turkish Statistical Institute. The causes of death were classified as group I: communicable, maternal, perinatal, and nutritional conditions; group II: non-communicable diseases (NCDs); and group III: injuries. Unknown or ill-defined causes of death were distributed within group I and group II. The percentage distribution of the cause-of-death groups by gender and age groups between 1980 and 2013 was identified. Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) per 100,000 of broad causes-of-death groups were calculated using European Standard Population 1976 between 1980 and 2008. Changes in mortality rates per hundred were calculated using the formula ([the rate of last year of the period−the rate of the first year of the period]/the rate of the first year of the period). Gender and age-specific data were analyzed using the Joinpoint software to examine trends and significant changes in trends of mortality rates. Results Crude death rates for group I, group II, and group III were 157.3, 147.2, and 21.4 per 100,000 in 1980 and 35.3, 377.5, and 15.8 in 2008 for males; 161.8, 120.2, and 5.8 in 1980 and 38.6, 318.4, and 6.4 in 2008 for females, respectively. ASMRs for group I, group II, and group III were 146.3, 394.3, and 29.3 per 100,000 in 1980 and 49.7, 723.6, and 18.8 in 2008 for males; 138.0, 291.5, and 7.6 per 100,000 in 1980 and 47.7, 478.8, and 7.2 in 2008 for females, respectively. The mortality rates of group I for almost all age groups particularly below 5 years of age decreased significantly. Conclusion This study indicates that Turkey is at an advanced stage in the epidemiological transition, with the majority of the causes of death from NCDs. Considering the regional differences, it is necessary to carry out studies on the specific details of epidemiological transition and the social determinants of deaths in Turkey. © 2017 The Royal Society for Public Health
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Treatment Requiring Retinopathy of Prematurity in Big Premature Infants in Turkiye: Report No. 1 (BIG-ROP Study)
    (S. Karger AG, 2024) Özdek Å.; Ozdemir H.B.; Ozen Tunay Z.; Bayramoglu S.E.; Alyamac Sukgen E.; Klr N.; Koç E.; Ekinci D.Y.; Sayin N.; Ceylan N.A.; Cebeci Z.; Çelik G.; Kizilay O.; Demir S.T.; Yildiz M.; Öztürk T.; Bekmez S.; Eris E.; Çömez A.; Mayali H.; Kabatas E.U.; Satirtav G.; Ögreden T.; Vural A.; Onur I.U.; Yeter D.Y.; Gönc T.; Tanidir S.T.; Akdogan M.; Çelemler P.; Beyazyildiz E.; Beyazyildiz Ö.; Acar D.E.; Özbay E.K.; Özcan Y.; Keles S.; Yildirim M.; Uzun A.; Dikci S.; Sari A.; Kara C.; Petriçli I.S.; Comba Ö.B.S.; Albayrak S.; Ersan B.A.; Bilgin B.; Çeliker H.; Sahin O.; Seymen Z.; Alaluf A.; Kaymak N.Z.; Oral A.Y.; Kerimoglu H.; Ünsal A.I.A.; Hirfanoglu I.M.; Tayman C.; Mert M.K.; Çetinkaya M.; Karatekin G.; Uslu S.; Özkan H.; Tüzün F.; Yildirim T.G.; Yurttutan S.; Dinlen N.F.; Bezirganoglu H.; Altinhan H.; Salihoglu Ö.; Tun G.; Karakurt D.G.; Bas A.Y.; Demiroglu Ö.B.; Aygün C.; Tekgündüz K.S.; Ceylan M.; Özdemir R.; Zübahiroglu U.; Özkiraz S.; Cömert S.; Akcan A.B.
    Introduction: The aim of the study was to analyse the clinical and demographic features of infants with gestational age (GA) of 32-37 weeks and birth weight (BW) of >1,500 g who developed treatment requiring retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: Data on the infants with a GA of 32-37 weeks and BW >1,500 g who developed treatment requiring ROP (TR-ROP) were collected retrospectively from the 33 ROP centres in Turkiye. GA, BW, type of hospital, neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) level, presence of an ophthalmologist and neonatologist in the same hospital, length of stay in NICU, duration of oxygen therapy, comorbidities, type of ROP, and timing for TR-ROP development were analysed. Results: A total of366 infants were included in the study. Mean GA and BW were 33 1 weeks and 1,896 316 g, respectively. Duration of hospitalization was 3-4 weeks in 46.8% of them. The first ROP examination was performed at postnatal 4-5 weeks in 80.3% of infants, which was significantly later in level 2 and lower NICUs and non-university clinics. At the first ROP examination, any stage of ROP was detected in 90.9% and TR-ROP was detected in 15.3% of the infants. The mean postnatal week of TR-ROP development was 6.16 2.04. Conclusion: Routine ROP screening thresholds need to be expanded in hospitals with suboptimal NICU conditions considering the development of TRROP in more mature and heavier preterm infants. The first ROP examination should be earlier than the fourth postnatal week. 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel. © 2024 S. Karger AG. All rights reserved.