Browsing by Author "Öztürk, MA"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A real-life analysis of patients with rheumatologic diseases on biological treatments: Data from TURKBIO RegistryÖnen, F; Can, G; Çapar, S; Dalkiliç, E; Pehlivan, Y; Senel, S; Akar, S; Koca, SS; Tufan, A; Yazici, A; Yilmaz, S; Inanç, N; Sari, I; Birlik, M; Solmaz, D; Cefle, A; Öztürk, MA; Yolbas, S; Krogh, NS; Yilmaz, N; Erten, S; Bes, C; Gündüz, ÖS; Göker, B; Haznedaroglu, S; Yavuz, S; Çetin, GY; Yildiz, F; Direskeneli, H; Akkoç, NObjective: TURKBIO registry, established in 2011, is the first nationwide biological database in Turkey. This study aimed to provide an overview of TURKBIO data collected by June 2018. Methods: The registry included adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-AxSpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Demographic and clinical features, disease activity markers, and other follow-up parameters, current and previous treatments, and adverse events were registered electronically at each visit using open-source software. The registration of patient-reported outcome measures was carried out electronically by the patients using touch screens. Results: TURKBIO registry included a total of 41,145 treatment series with biologicals. There were 2,588 patients with axSpA (2,459 AS and 129 nr-axSpA), 2,036 with RA, and 428 with PsA. The total number of patients, including those with other diagnoses, was 5,718. In the follow-up period, the number of patients and also visits steadily increased by years. The yearly mean number of visits per patient was found to be 2.3. Significant improvements in disease activity and health assessment parameters were observed following the biological treatments. Biologics were often given in combination with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with RA. Infections were the most commonly seen adverse events, followed by allergic reactions. Tuberculosis was observed in 12 patients, malignancy in 18, and treatment-related mortality in 31. Conclusion: TURKBIO provided a valuable real-life experience with the use of biologics in rheumatic diseases in Turkey.Item THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ANTI-TNF A TREATMENT IN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS PATIENTS WITH LATE ONSET COMPARED TO THOSE WITH ADULT ONSET; THE DATA FROM TURKBIO REGISTRYUslu, S; Can, G; Cefle, A; Yilmaz, S; Kocaer, SB; Inel, TY; Gülle, S; Koca, SS; Yolbas, S; Öztürk, MA; Senel, S; Inanc, N; Dalkiliç, E; Soysal, O; Tufan, A; Akar, S; Birlik, M; Sari, I; Akkoc, N; Onen, FItem The Efficacy and Safety of Anti-TNFα Treatment in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients with Late Onset Compared to Those with Adult Onset; The Data from TURKBIO RegistryUslu, S; Can, G; Cefle, A; Yilmaz, S; Kocaer, SB; Inel, TY; Gülle, S; Koca, SS; Yolbas, S; Öztürk, MA; Senel, S; Inanc, N; Dalkiliç, E; Gunduz, O; Tufan, A; Akar, S; Birlik, M; Sari, I; Akkoç, N; Onen, FItem LONG-TERM SURVIVAL OF THE FIRST BIOLOGIC TREATMENT IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND THE EFFECT OF THE SELECTED TREATMENT ON DRUG SURVIVAL; TURKBIO REGISTRYKocaer, SB; Inel, TY; Erez, Y; Avsar, AK; Uslu, S; Karakas, A; Gulle, S; Can, G; Sari, I; Birlik, M; Dalkiliç, E; Pehlivan, Y; Akar, S; Cefle, A; Öztürk, MA; Yolbas, S; Yilmaz, N; Erten, S; Akkoc, N; Onen, FItem Impact of rheumatoid arthritis in Turkey: a questionnaire studyDireskeneli, H; Akkoç, N; Bes, C; Çakir, N; Çefle, A; Çobankara, V; Dalkiliç, E; Dinç, A; Ertenli, T; Gül, A; Hamuryudan, V; Inanç, M; Kalyoncu, U; Karaaslan, Y; Kasifoglu, T; Keser, G; Keskin, G; Kisacik, B; Kiraz, S; Masatlioglu, S; Onat, AM; Özbek, S; Öztürk, MA; Pamuk, ÖN; Pay, S; Pirildar, T; Sayarlioglu, M; Senel, S; Sentürk, T; Tasan, D; Terzioglu, E; Yazici, A; Yücel, EObjective Unmet needs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients regarding physician/patient communication, treatment preferences and quality of life issues were investigated in a Turkish survey study. Methods The study was conducted with the contribution of 33 rheumatologists, and included 519 RA patients. The study population included patients who had been on biologic therapy for >6 months and were still receiving biologic therapy (BT group), and those who were biologic naive, but found eligible for biologic treatment (NBT group). Of the RA patients, 35.5% initially had a visit to an internal disease specialist, 25.5% to a physical therapy and rehabilitation specialist, and 12.2% to a rheumatology specialist for their RA complaints. The diagnosis of RA was made by a rheumatologist in 48.2% of patients. Results The majority of RA patients (86.3%) visit their doctor within 15-week intervals. Most of the physician-patient communication focused on disease symptoms (99.0%) and impact of the disease on quality of life (61.8%). The proportion of RA patients who perceived their health status as good/very good/excellent was higher in the BT group than in the NBT group (74.3% vs. 51.5%, p<0.001). However, of those RA patients in the NBT group, only 24.8% have been recommended to start a biologic treatment by their doctors. With respect to dose frequency options, once-monthly injections were preferred (80%) to a bi-weekly injection schedule (8%). Conclusion In conclusion, RA patients receiving biologic therapy reported higher rates of improved symptoms and better quality of life and seemed to be more satisfied with their treatment in our study.