Browsing by Author "Özveren, A"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Palliative Biliary Drainage Has No Effect on Survival in Pancreatic Cancer: Medical Oncology Perspective
    Erdogan, AP; Ekinci, F; Yildirim, S; Özveren, A; Göksel, G
    Purpose Removal of obstructive jaundice in metastatic pancreatic cancer is an important part of palliative therapy. However, it is not known whether invasive procedures reduce cancer-related mortality. In this study, the effect of palliative biliary drainage on survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients was evaluated. Methods Patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and undergoing biliary drainage in two different centers between 2010 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Results Biliary drainage was applied to 73 patients, constituting 20.6% of 355 patients included in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with biliary stent was 5 months, while the median PFS of patients without stenting was 5.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.1 and 11.5 months, respectively (p: 0.424, p: 0.802). Conclusions A positive effect of palliative biliary drainage on median PFS and OS could not be demonstrated in our study group. In pancreatic cancer, predictive markers are needed to select patients who can derive a survival benefit from biliary drainage.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Second-Line Treatment Options: Is the Difference Only in Cost?
    Yildirim, S; Erdogan, AP; Karateke, M; Yilmaz, C; Özveren, A; Bulut, G; Ekinci, F; Almuradova, E
    Introduction Although pancreatic cancer ranks seventh in cancer-related deaths, it is an extremely fatal disease, and more than 330,000 people die from this disease worldwide. Although there are many first-line treatment studies in the literature, there are almost no prospective studies regarding second-line therapy. Therefore, there is no standard approach in the second-line treatment of pancreatic cancer. We decided to conduct this study to investigate second-line treatments with problems such as cost, treatment efficacy, and toxicity. Methods Patients older than 18 years old who applied to Ege University Hospital medical oncology department with a diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic cancer, who received first-line chemotherapy due to their illness, and who had progressed afterwards were included in the study. The files of the patients who applied between 2013 and 2017 were examined. Results Our study's primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and it was found that the median progression-free survival was 3.2 months in the Xelox patients, 3.7 months in the gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel patients, and 3.5 months in the other regimens. When the secondary endpoint was evaluated, overall survival, the median overall survival was 5.9 months in the Xelox patients, 5.3 months in the gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel patients, and 4.8 months in the other regimens. Conclusion As a result, second-line treatments were compared, and no statistically significant difference was found between them. For this reason, the side effects of previously used drugs and the side effects of new drugs to be used, as well as their costs, should be evaluated when choosing a treatment.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Real-Life Data of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Aegean Region Experience
    Erdogan, AP; Ekinci, F; Özveren, A; Eniseler, EB; Demir, B; Sahbazlar, M
    Objective: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer is increasing. However the management of locally advanced breast cancer differs due to the approach of the center to which the patient applied and the approach of the following physician. From this point of view, we aimed to evaluate the real life data of our region. Methods: The study included 106 patients treated with NACT in the medical oncology clinic of two different university hospitals. Association between clinicopathological features and pathological complete response (pCR) were analyzed. Results: The pCR rate was higher in patients with negative hormone receptors and this difference was statistically significant (p:0.000). The rate of obtaining pCR increased as the NACT duration increased, and this increase was statistically significant. The mean NACT duration applied to the patients with pCR was 5.48 +/- 0.22 months, and the mean NACT duration for those who could not obtain pCR was 5.01 +/- 0.1 months (p:0.041). The recurrence rate of patients with pCR was 11.1%, while the recurrence rate of patients who could not obtain pCR was 31.6% (p:0.04). Conclusion: Pathological response to chemotherapy is an important factor in determining prognosis. There appears to be a need for new biomarkers that allow the prediction of pCR and long-term outcomes.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study
    Özyurt, N; Alkan, A; Gülbagci, B; Seyyar, M; Aydin, E; Sahbazlar, M; Türker, M; Kinikoglu, O; Yerlikaya, T; Dinç, G; Aytaç, A; Kalkan, Z; Ebinç, S; Gültürk, I; Keskinkiliç, M; Isleyen, ZS; Çaglayan, D; Türkel, A; Aydin, E; Sakalar, T; Sekmek, S; Yildirim, N; Koçak, S; Okutur, K; Özveren, A; Dursun, B; Kitapli, S; Eren, OÖ; Beypinar, I; Hacibekiroglu, I; Çabuk, D; Karaman, E; Acar, Ö; Paydas, S; Eryilmaz, MK; Demir, B; Oruç, Z; Yilmaz, M; Biricik, FS; Salim, DK; Tanriverdi, Ö; Dogan, M
    The studies evaluating the impact of Her2 levels in neoadjuvant setting have conflicting data. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer(TNBC). In the study TNBC patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery were analyzed retrospectively. The primary aim of the study was to analyze the impact of Her2 status(Her2-0 and Her2-low) on pathological complete response (pCR). The secondary objectives were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). 620 female triple negative breast cancer patients were evaluated. 427 patients (68.9%) had Her2-0 and 193(31.1%) had her2-low pathology. The pCR rates were similar between Her2-0 and Her2-low patients (33.0% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.098). Although Her2-0 group has better DFS (106 vs. 50 months, p = 0.002), in multivariate analysis it had a HR of 0.74 (p = 0.06). In addition, OS was similar (131 vs. 105 months, p = 0.13) with a HR of 0.88 (p = 0.61). In multivariate analysis; presence of LVI (HR:2.2 (95% CI 1.1-3.5) p = 0.001), Clinical stage T1/T2 (HR:0.39 (95% CI 0.2-0.6) p < 0.001) and lymph node negativity (HR:0.35 (95% CI 0.1-0.9) p = 0.03) were independent factors for OS. Although there were pathological and clinical differences, the pCR, DFS and OS were similar between Her2-0 and Her2-low TNBC patients. The importance of Her2 status of TNBC in neoadjuvant setting should be further studied.