Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All Contents
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "İlker S.S."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of the effect of body position on intraocular pressure measured with rebound tonometer
    (Turkish Ophthalmology Society, 2019) Mayalı H.; Tekin B.; Kayıkçıoğlu Ö.R.; Kurt E.; İlker S.S.
    Objectives: It is important to determine variables that influence intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of body position on IOP. Materials and Methods: The study included 52 right eyes of 52 patients who presented to the ophthalmology department of our hospital and had no ocular disease except refractive errors. IOP was measured with an Icare PRO tonometer while patients were in sitting, standing, and supine positions, with intervals of 10 minutes between the positions. Correlations between the results were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation analysis and Wilcoxon tests. Results: Thirty-six of the 52 patients were female, 16 were male. Mean age was 31.65±6.30 (23-47) years. Mean IOP values in the sitting, standing, and lying positions were 17.76±3.41 (12.70-25.60) mmHg, 17.10±3.27 (11.50-25.20) mmHg, and 18.46±4.67 (10.50-29.40) mmHg, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between measurements taken in the different positions (p=0.112, p=0.472, p=0.071). We observed that there was no relationship between age and body position (p>0.45, p>0.79, p>0.77) or between gender and position (p>0.59, p>0.69, p>0.54). Conclusion: Gender and age had no effect on IOP measured in different body positions. There were also no significant differences between IOP values measured in the different positions. Therefore, we believe the portable Icare PRO tonometer can be used for patients who are confined to bed and will provide IOP measurements that are concordant with values obtained while sitting. © 2019 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparison of icare pro tonometry and icare one tonometry measurements in healthy eyes
    (Turkish Ophthalmology Society, 2019) Mayalı H.; Sarıgül Ç.; Kurt E.; Kayıkçıoğlu Ö.R.; İlker S.S.
    Objectives: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Icare Pro tonometer used in clinical practice and the Icare One self-tonometer. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two eyes of 52 healthy, right-handed individuals with no prior intraocular surgery or ocular trauma, structural ocular pathology, or systemic disease were evaluated. IOP was first measured using the Icare Pro tonometer. The participants were then told how to use the Icare One tonometer and asked to measure their own IOP. The results were analyzed statistically using SPSS v.24. Results: Of the 52 healthy participants, 16 (30.7%) were male and 36 (69.3%) were female. Their mean age was 31.6±6.3 (23-47) years. Mean IOP measured with the Icare Pro was 17.10±6.2 (11.5-25.2) mmHg, and the mean self-measured IOP with Icare One was 14.01±3.4 (7-24) mmHg. When the two methods were compared using Levene’s t-test, there was a significant mean difference of -3.08±0.6 (95% confidence interval: -4.39 -1.78; p<0.001). Conclusion: In this study, there was a significant difference between the IOP measurements we made using the Icare Pro and the participants’ self-measured IOP using the Icare One, with the latter being relatively lower. This may be related to the fact that the participants were unfamiliar with using the Icare One. Although the Icare One is a promising tool for glaucoma patients to self-monitor their IOP, further studies are needed. © 2019 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Pulsatile Proptosis and Sphenoid Wing Dysplasia with no Evidence of Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    (Turkish Ophthalmology Society, 2024) Delibay Akgün Y.; Erdoğan M.; Altınışık M.; Mayalı H.; İlker S.S.
    In this study, we aimed to present a rare case of pulsatile proptosis due to sphenoid wing dysplasia without the features of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). A 17-year-old male patient presented with swelling in the superotemporal region of the right eye. Physical examination revealed facial asymmetry with a pulsatile, ill-defined, soft lesion with in the superotemporal region of the right orbit associated with pulsatile proptosis, downward dystopia, and hypotropia. Computer tomography imaging to establish a differential diagnosis showed temporal lobe herniation secondary to sphenoid wing dysplasia. The patient was assessed for NF1, which is most commonly associated with sphenoid wing dysplasia, but no evidence supporting the diagnosis was found. Patients presenting with proptosis should be carefully examined for pulsation and murmurs, and a trauma history should be investigated. Radiological imaging should be used to facilitate the differential diagnosis, and the current clinical condition should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach. © 2024 by the Turkish Ophthalmological Association / Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology published by Galenos Publishing House.

Manisa Celal Bayar University copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback