Browsing by Author "Akdogan, N"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effect of pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on oncological outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: A multicenter study of the Turkish Uro-oncology Association
    Izol, V; Ok, F; Aslan, G; Akdogan, B; Sozen, S; Ozden, E; Celik, O; Muezzinoglu, T; Turkeri, L; Akdogan, N; Baltaci, S
    Background Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the gold standard method for lymph node staging in prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the effect of PLND combined with radical prostatectomy (RP) on oncological outcomes in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC) patients. Methods Patients with D'Amico IRPC were included in the study. In the overall cohort and subgroups (biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group 2 and 3), patients were divided into two groups as PLND and no-PLND. More extensive PLND, defined as a number of removed nodes (NRN) >= 75th percentile. Results After exclusion, a total of 631 patients were included: 351 (55.6%) had PLND and 280 (44.4%) had no-PLND. The mean age was 63.1 +/- 3.60 years. The median NRN was 8.0 (1.0-40.0). The mean follow-up period was 47.7 +/- 37.5 months. The lymph node involvement (LNI) rate was 5.7% in the overall cohort, 3.9% in ISUP grade 2, and 10.8% in ISUP grade 3. Patients with PLND were associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics but no significant difference in biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) was found between patients with PLND and no-PLND (p = 0.642). In the subgroup analysis for ISUP grades 2 and 3, no significant difference in BCRFS outcomes was found in patients with PLND and No-PLND (p = 0.680 and p = 0.922). Also, PLND extent had no effect on BCRFS (p = 0.569). The multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for preoperative tumor characteristics revealed that prostate specific antigen (PSA) (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25; p = 0.048) was an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR). The optimum cut-off value for PSA, which can predict BCRFS, was assigned to be 7.81 ng/ml, with an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.571-0.688). The highest sensitivity and specificity were 0.667 and 0.549. Conclusion Overall and cancer-specific survival analyzes were not evaluated because not enough events were observed. Neither PLND nor its extent improved BCRFS outcomes in IRPC. The LNI rate is low in patients with biopsy ISUP grade 2 and the BCR rate is low in those with PSA < 7.81 ng/dl so PLND can be omitted in these IRPC patients.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effect of pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on oncological outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: A multicenter study of the Turkish Urooncology Association
    Izol, V; Ok, F; Aslan, G; Akdogan, B; Sozen, S; Ozden, E; Celik, O; Muezzinoglu, T; Turkeri, L; Akdogan, N; Baltaci, S
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Can We Predict Recurrence of pT1-2 Renal Cell Carcinoma?
    Üçer, O; Mueezzinoglu, T; Aslan, G; Sueer, E; Baltaci, S; Izol, V; Özden, E; Akdogan, B; Yazici, S; Bulut, EC; Akdogan, N; Sözen, S
    Objective: Some prognostic models have been described for localized and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The European Association of Urology guidelines on RCC recommend using these models. However, there is no model for T1 and T2. The study evaluated the risk factors for recurrence in T1 and T2 RCC. Materials and Methods: Data of 4823 renal tumor patients from the Renal Tumor Database of the Association of Urooncology in Turkey were evaluated. Of 4823 patients, 1845 RCC patients with pathological T1 or T2 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the recurrence status. Anatomical, histological, and clinical prognostic factors were statistically compared between the groups. Afterwards, multivariate analysis was performed for the variables that were found to be statistically significant. Results: The mean follow-up time was 30 (4-180) months. Of 1845 RCC patients, 117 (6.3%) had recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences between age, preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, neutrophil, alkaline phosphates, platelet and calcium values, histological subtype, Fuhrman grade, surgical technique (radical or partial), and pathological stage in the groups. However, in multivariate analysis, only pathological stage was found to be a risk factor for recurrence (2.17 95%, 1.25-3.77). Conclusions: The results of our study show that it is difficult to design a prognostic model for the recurrence of pT1 and pT2 RCC. We suggest that patients with a higher tumor diameter should be followed up more frequently.