Browsing by Author "Baççioglu, A"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Role of leukotriene antagonists and antihistamines in treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma comorbidityBaççioglu, A; Yorgancioglu, A; Cingi, C; Çuhadaroglu, ÇLeukotriene receptor antagonists and antihistamines are efficient in reducing symptoms of allergic rhinitis and asthma when used alone or in combination. In patients with allergic rhinitis, H1-antihistamines prevent and relieve the sneezing, itching, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion that characterize the early and the late response to allergen. H1-antihistamines are not medications of choice in asthmatic patients, but controlling rhinitis will improve asthma concomitantly. Leukotriene antagonist such as montelukast may be an alternative treatment for mild persistent asthma as monotherapy where inhaled corticosteroid cannot be administered or alternative to long-acting beta agonist as an add-on therapy to ICS for moderate to severe persistent asthma. Although montelukast is an effective drug in allergic rhinitis indicated as monotherapy, but widely recommended as adjunct to antihistamine or intranasal corticosteroid. Antileukotriene agents are also widely used in the treatment of pediatric asthma. In children, maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in pure episodic ( viral) wheeze was ineffective, but maintenance as well as intermittent montelukast was shown to have an efficient role in both episodic and multi trigger wheeze. Furthermore, their advantage to inhaled corticosteroids is that leukotriene receptor antagonists do not affect short-term lower leg growth rate in prepubertal children.Item Stepwise Approach in Asthma Revisited 2023: Expert Panel Opinion of Turkish Guideline of Asthma Diagnosis and Management GroupÇelik, GE; Aydin, Ö; Damadoglu, E; Baççioglu, A; Özdemir, SK; Bavbek, S; Ediger, D; Erkekol, FÖ; Gemicioglu, B; Isik, SR; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Keren, M; Mungan, D; Oguzülgen, IK; Yildiz, F; Yilmaz, I; Yorgancioglu, AIntroduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been the cornerstone of the long-term management of asthma. ICSs either alone or in combination with long-acting beta-2 agonists have been shown to be associated with favorable asthma outcomes. However, asthma con-trol is still reported to be below expectations all around the world. Research in the last decades focusing on the use of ICS/formoterol both as maintenance and as needed (maintenance and reliever therapy approach) showed improved asthma outcomes. As a result of recent developments, Turkish Asthma Guidelines group aimed to revise asthma treatment recommendations. In general, we recommend physi-cians to consider the risk factors for poor asthma outcomes, patients' compliance and expectations and then to determine a personalized treatment plan. Importantly, the use of short-acting beta-2 agonists alone as a symptom reliever in asthma patients not using regular ICS is no longer recommended. In stepwise treatment approach, we primarily recommend to use ICS-based controllers and initiate ICS as soon as possible. We define 2 different treatment tracks in stepwise approaches as maintenance and reliever therapy or fixed-dose therapy and equally recommend each track depending on the patient's risks as well as decision of physicians in a personalized manner. For both tracks, a strong recommendation was made in favor of using add-on treatments before initiating phenotype-specific treatment in step 5. A strong recommendation was also made in favor of using biologic agents and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization in severe asthma when indicated.Item Elderly and aged asthma have different characteristics: results of a multicenter studyDamadoglu, E; Öztürk Aktas, Ö; Gemicioglu, B; Yilmaz, N; Bozkus, F; Ayhan, V; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Öner Erkekol, F; Havlucu, Y; Erel, F; Aydin, Ö; Ekici, A; Baççioglu, A; Argun Baris, S; Köycü Buhari, G; Ceyhan, B; Göksel, Ö; Köse, M; Dursun, AB; Yildiz, F; Yorgancioglu, A; Isik, SR; Ediger, D; Oguzülgen, IK; Demir, AU; Karakaya, G; Kalyoncu, AFBackground/ aim: Characteristics of asthma in the elderly population is not well-known. The aim of the present study was to evaluate asthma in the elderly population, to compare disease characteristics between patients diagnosed <60 (aged asthma) and >= 60 (elderly asthma) years of age. Materials and methods: The study was a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional type. A questionnaire was filled out to patients 60 years of age and over, that have been followed for asthma for at least 3 months. Asthma Control Test (ACT), eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was filled out, inhaler device technique was assessed. Results: A total of 399 patients were included from 17 tertiary care centers across the country. Mean age was 67.11 years and 331 (83%) were female. The age at asthma diagnosis was >= 60 in 146 (36.6%) patients. Patients diagnosed >= 60 years were older (p < 0.001), had higher education level (p < 0.001), more commonly had first -degree relative with asthma (p = 0.038), asthma related comorbidities (p = 0.009) and accompanying rhinitis/rhinosinusitis (p = 0.005), had better asthma control (p = 0.001), were using less controller medications (p = 0.014). Inhaler technique was correct in 37% of the patients with no difference in between the groups. Treatment compliance was better in elderly asthma patients (p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, having well -controlled asthma (odds ratio = 1.61, CI = 1.04-2.51), and high medication adherence rate (odds ratio = 2.43, CI = 1.48-4.0) were associated with being in the elderly asthma group. Conclusion: The characteristics of asthma are different among patients aged 60 years and over which seems to be related to onset age of asthma. In our cohort, the elderly asthma patients had higher education level, and treatment adherence and asthma control was better. Patients diagnosed >= 60 years of age did not have more severe disease.