Browsing by Author "Bahceci, A"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The mean platelet volume may predict the development of isolated bone metastases in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective study of the Young Researchers Committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)
    Tanriverdi, O; Menekse, S; Teker, F; Oktay, E; Pilanci, KN; Gunaldi, M; Kocar, M; Kacan, T; Bahceci, A; Avci, N; Akman, T; Cokmert, S; Yesil-Cinkir, H; Yanmaz, MT
    Purpose: To determine the predictive value of the mean platelet volume (MPV) and the MPV/platelet count ratio on the development of isolated bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Methods: A total of 121 previously untreated female patients with isolated bone metastases from breast cancer (group 1) were included in this retrospective cohort study. The patients enrolled in this study had similar age, biological subtypes, and duration of follow-up after diagnosis. Group 1 was compared with both 71 previously untreated women with breast cancer with no metastases at all (group 2) and 39 healthy women (group 3). Demographic data, laboratory tests and histological features of all of the patients in groups 1 and 2 were recorded and the study variables from each of the three groups were compared. Results: In group 1, the cut-off value (9.2 fL) for the MPV was determined and patients were stratified into 4 subgroups. The MPV was higher in group 1 than in either group 2 or group 3. Group 1 patients had a MPV of 8.8 +/- 3.1 fL (mean 5.1, range: 6.1-15.6) and the cut-off value for MPV was 9.2fl. For patients in group 1, the MPV distribution was stratified into 4 groups as follows: group A included MPV values <6.08 fL, in group B values ranged from 6.09 to 8.46 fL, group C included values from 8.47 to 10.05 fL, and group D included patients with MPV values >10.06fL. MPV and the presence of lymphovascular invasion were found to be independent risk factors for the development of isolated bone metastases. Conclusion: We concluded that MPV can be used to predict the development of isolated bone metastases.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    XELOX Plus Bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology
    Duran, AO; Karaca, H; Besiroglu, M; Bayoglu, IV; Menekse, S; Yapici, HS; Yazilitas, D; Bahceci, A; Uysal, M; Sevinc, A; Hacibekiroglu, I; Aksoy, A; Tanriverdi, O; Arpaci, E; Inanc, M; Dane, F; Ozkan, M
    Background: XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC. Materials and Methods: A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n=111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%), stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95% CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95% CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p=0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95% CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95% CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p=0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy and safety of folfiri plus aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-life data from Turkish oncology group
    Erol, C; Sendur, MAN; Bilgetekin, I; Garbioglu, DB; Hamdard, J; Akbas, S; Hizal, M; Arslan, C; Sevinc, A; Kucukarda, A; Erdem, D; Kahraman, S; Cakir, E; Demirkiran, A; On, S; Dogan, I; Erdogan, AP; Koca, S; Kubilay, P; Eren, OO; Cilbir, E; Celik, E; Araz, M; Ozyukseler, DT; Yildirim, ME; Bahceci, A; Taskaynatan, H; Oyman, A; Deniz, GI; Menekse, S; Kut, E; Gulmez, A; Sakin, A; Nayir, E; Acar, R; Sen, E; Inal, A; Turhal, S; Kaya, AO; Paydas, S; Tastekin, D; Hacibekiroglu, I; Cincin, I; Bilici, A; Mandel, NM; Dede, DS; Akinci, MB; Oksuzoglu, B; Uncu, D; Yalcin, B; Artac, M
    Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial.