Browsing by Author "Barutçuoǧlu M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Intracranial hydatid cyst is a rare cause of midbrain herniation: A case report and literature review
    (2013) Duransoy Y.K.; Mete M.; Barutçuoǧlu M.; Ünsal Ü.Ü.; Selçuki M.
    Hydatid disease is a parasitic infection affecting the brain in about 2% of the cases. Brain involvement is most commonly observed in children. Here, we report a 13-year-old male patient who presented with headache, nausea, and vomiting. Before cranial computed tomography (CT) was performed, the patient had generalized epileptic seizures. He was disoriented, and had anisocoria with dilatation of the right pupilla. CT showed a cystic lesion of 10-cm diameter in the right temporoparietal region that had caused a shift of the midline structures to the contralateral side; an urgent operation was performed as there were signs of midbrain herniation.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Total Laminectomy, Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression, and Total Laminectomy with Posterior Transpedicular Screw Fixation
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024) Barutçuoǧlu M.; Mete M.; Unsal U.U.; Gurgen A.İ.; Duransoy Y.K.
    Introduction: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common diseases for spinal surgery and many surgical techniques are used for treatment. Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to observe the clinical and radiological results of total laminectomy (TL), unilateral approach for bilateral decompression, and posterior transpedicular fixation-interbody fusion with TL. Materials and Methods: The data of 112 patients who underwent surgical treatment for LSS with different surgical techniques were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the surgical technique. In the first group, patients underwent TL, in the second group, patients underwent bilateral decompression via unilateral hemilaminectomy, and in the third group, patients underwent posterior transpedicular fixation-interbody fusion with TL. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were done by visual analog scale (VAS) and functional back pain scales (FBPSs). Furthermore, three groups were compared in respect of operation time, bleeding, and complications. Results: The difference between preoperative and postoperative VAS and FBPS scores were statistically significant in all groups. Operation time, bleeding, and hospital stay were greater in fusion group than decompression-alone groups. The VAS improvement rate was 66%, 70%, and 62% in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. In addition, improvement of FBPS scores between preoperative and postoperative period was statistically significant for the three groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Decompression with fusion surgery had no significant difference compared with decompression alone in patient's clinical outcome and safety. © 2025 Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology.