Browsing by Author "Cagiltay E."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Protective Effect of Losartan on Diabetic Neuropathy in a Diabetic Rat Model
    (Georg Thieme Verlag, 2015) Cavusoglu T.; Karadeniz T.; Cagiltay E.; Karadeniz M.; Yigitturk G.; Acikgoz E.; Uyanikgil Y.; Ates U.; Tuglu M.I.; Erbas O.
    Aim: Involvement of the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems is possibly the most frequent complication of diabetes. Important risk factors included hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACE) inhibitors should be beneficial in all vascular beds, including neuropathy and retinopathy. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan on diabetic neuropathy in a diabetic rat model. Material and Methods: 24 male, Sprague Dawley albino mature rats were divided into 3 groups; (1) control group: No drug was administered to the remainder of rats which blood glucose levels were under 120mg/dl, (2) diabetic control: rats were given no medication, but 4ml per day of tap water was given by oral gavage, (3) losartan groups: rats were given 10mg/kg/day oral of losartan for 4 weeks. Electromyography (EMG) was applied to anesthetized rats at the end of 4th weekend. Then, the animals were euthanized and sciatic nerve was performed for histopathological examination. Results: Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) amplitude of diabetic rats receiving the Saline in the EMG was significantly reduced when compared to the control group. Distal latency value and CMAP duration of diabetic rats receiving the saline were meaningfully increased when compared to the control group. CMAP amplitude and CMAP duration of diabetic rats receiving the Losartan treatment in the EMG were meaningfully reduced when compared to diabetic rats receiving the Saline. Perineural thickness in the rats receiving the Losartan treatment was found to be significantly reduced when compared to the group receiving the Saline. Conclusions: As a result, it has been shown in this study that perineural thickness of the Losartan treatment was significantly reduced when compared to saline receiving group, significantly increased the immunoexpression of NGF, and also provided a significantly recovery in EMG when compared to Saline receiving group. © J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Turkish nationwide survEy of glycemic and other Metabolic parameters of patients with Diabetes mellitus (TEMD study)
    (Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 2018) Sonmez A.; Haymana C.; Bayram F.; Salman S.; Dizdar O.S.; Gurkan E.; Kargili Carlıoglu A.; Barcin C.; Sabuncu T.; Satman I.; Guldiken S.; Ayturk S.; Yilmaz M.; Asik M.; Dinccag N.; Cakmak R.; Turker F.; Idiz C.; Hacisahinogullari H.; Bagdemir E.; Yildiz B.; Yumuk V.D.; Haliloglu O.; Sancak S.; Ozsari L.; Cagiltay E.; Deyneli O.; Imre E.; Gonen S.; Boysan S.N.; Altuntas Y.; Ozturk F.Y.; Mert M.; Piskinpasa H.; Aydin H.; Imamoglu S.; Ersoy C.; Gul O.O.; Kucuksarac Kiyici S.; Cetinarslan B.; Selek A.; Dogru T.; Kirik A.; Kebapci N.; Efe B.; Kaya A.; Cordan I.; Baldane S.; Kirac C.O.; Demirci I.; Capa Z.; Cesur M.; Yetkin I.; Corapcioglu D.; Canlar S.; Bulent Yildiz O.; Sendur S.N.; Cakir B.; Ozdemir D.; Corakci A.; Kutlu M.; Bascil Tutuncu N.; Bozkus Y.; Cakal E.; Demirbas B.; Ertek S.; Altay M.; Dagdeviren M.; Abedi A.H.; Cetinkalp S.; Ozisik H.; Oruk G.G.; Yener S.; Saydam B.O.; Guney E.; Unubol M.; Yaylali G.F.; Topsakal S.; Hekimsoy Z.; Akbaba G.; Aslan I.; Balci M.K.; Dalkiran S.; Akbay E.; Gul K.; Agbaht K.; Yilmaz M.O.; Bozkirli E.; Tetiker B.T.; Cetinkaya Altuntas S.; Atmaca A.; Durmuş E.T.; Mete T.; Kutluturk F.; Kucukler F.K.; Dikbas O.; Akin S.; Nuhoglu I.; Ersoz H.O.; Bayraktaroglu T.; Sisman P.; Sahin I.; Cetin S.; Capoglu I.; Akbas E.M.; Ucler R.; Eren M.A.; Tuzcu A.K.; Pekkolay Z.; Ozkaya M.; Araz M.
    Aims: Turkey has the highest prevalence of diabetes in Europe. It is therefore essential to know the overall cardiovascular risk and reveal the predictors of metabolic control in Turkish adults with diabetes mellitus. Methods: A nationwide, multicenter survey consecutively enrolled patients who were under follow up for at least a year. Optimal control was defined as HbA1c < 7%, home arterial blood pressure (ABP) < 135/85 mmHg, or LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. Achieving all parameters indicated triple metabolic control. Results: HbA1c levels of patients (n = 5211) were 8.6 ± 1.9% (71 ± 22 mmol/mol) and 7.7 ± 1.7% (61 ± 19 mmol/mol), in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Glycemic control was achieved in 15.3% and 40.2%, and triple metabolic control was achieved in 5.5% and 10.1%, respectively. Only 1.5% of patients met all the criteria of being non-obese, non-smoker, exercising, and under triple metabolic control. Low education level was a significant predictor of poor glycemic control in both groups. Conclusions: Few patients with Type 2, and even fewer with Type 1 diabetes have optimal metabolic control in Turkey. TEMD study will provide evidence-based information to policy makers to focus more on the quality and sustainability of diabetes care in order to reduce the national burden of the disease. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Utilization of statins and LDL-cholesterol target attainment in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes - a nationwide cross-sectional study (TEMD dyslipidemia study)
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2020) Bayram F.; Sonmez A.; Haymana C.; Sabuncu T.; Dizdar O.S.; Gurkan E.; Carlioglu A.K.; Agbaht K.; Ozdemir D.; Demirci I.; Barcin C.; Salman S.; Tetiker T.; Balci M.K.; Kebapci N.; Ersoy C.; Yumuk V.; Toth P.P.; Satman I.; Guldiken S.; Ayturk S.; Yilmaz M.; Asik M.; Dinccag N.; Cakmak R.; Turker F.; Idiz C.; Hacisahinogullari H.; Bagdemir E.; Yildiz B.; Haliloglu O.; Sancak S.; Ozsari L.; Cagiltay E.; Deyneli O.; Imre E.; Gonen S.; Boysan S.N.; Altuntas Y.; Ozturk F.Y.; Mert M.; Piskinpasa H.; Aydin H.; Imamoglu S.; Gul O.O.; Kiyici S.K.; Cetinarslan B.; Selek A.; Dogru T.; Kirik A.; Efe B.; Kaya A.; Cordan I.; Baldane S.; Kirac C.O.; Capa Z.; Cesur M.; Yetkin I.; Corapcioglu D.; Canlar S.; Yildiz O.B.; Sendur S.N.; Cakir B.; Corakci A.; Kutlu M.; Tutuncu N.B.; Bozkus Y.; Cakal E.; Demirbas B.; Ertek S.; Altay M.; Dagdeviren M.; Abedi A.H.; Cetinkalp S.; Ozisik H.; Oruk G.G.; Yener S.; Saydam B.O.; Guney E.; Unubol M.; Yaylali G.F.; Topsakal S.; Hekimsoy Z.; Akbaba G.; Aslan I.; Dalkiran S.; Akbay E.; Gul K.; Yilmaz M.O.; Bozkirli E.; Altuntas S.C.; Atmaca A.; Durmuş E.T.; Mete T.; Kutluturk F.; Kucukler F.K.; Dikbas O.; Akin S.; Nuhoglu I.; Ersoz H.O.; Bayraktaroglu T.; Sisman P.; Sahin I.; Cetin S.; Capoglu I.; Akbas E.M.; Ucler R.; Eren M.A.; Tuzcu A.K.; Pekkolay Z.; Ozkaya M.; Araz M.
    Background: Attaining acceptable levels of LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The LDL-C target attainment and the characteristics of patients attaining these targets were investigated in this study. Furthermore, the reasons for not choosing statins and the physicians’ attitudes on the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia were also examined. Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted in tertiary centers for diabetes management. Adult patients with T2DM, who were under follow-up for at least a year in outpatient clinics, were consecutively enrolled for the study. LDL-C goals were defined as below 70 mg/dL for patients with macrovascular complications or diabetic nephropathy, and below 100 mg/dL for other patients. Data about lipid-lowering medications were self-reported. Results: A total of 4504 patients (female: 58.6%) were enrolled for the study. The mean HbA1c and diabetes duration was 7.73 ± 1.74% and 10.9 ± 7.5 years, respectively. The need for statin treatment was 94.9% (n = 4262); however, only 42.4% (n = 1807) of these patients were under treatment, and only 24.8% (n = 448) of these patients achieved LDL-C targets. The main reason for statin discontinuation was negative media coverage (87.5%), while only a minority of patients (12.5%) mentioned side effects. Physicians initiated lipid-lowering therapy in only 20.3% of patients with high LDL-C levels. It was observed that the female gender was a significant independent predictor of not attaining LDL-C goals (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59–0.83). Conclusions: Less than 50 % of patients with T2DM who need statins were under treatment, and only a quarter of them attained their LDL-C targets. There exists a significant gap between the guideline recommendations and the real-world evidence in the treatment of dyslipidemia in T2DM. © 2020, The Author(s).