Browsing by Author "Deyneli O."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Turkish nationwide survEy of glycemic and other Metabolic parameters of patients with Diabetes mellitus (TEMD study)(Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 2018) Sonmez A.; Haymana C.; Bayram F.; Salman S.; Dizdar O.S.; Gurkan E.; Kargili Carlıoglu A.; Barcin C.; Sabuncu T.; Satman I.; Guldiken S.; Ayturk S.; Yilmaz M.; Asik M.; Dinccag N.; Cakmak R.; Turker F.; Idiz C.; Hacisahinogullari H.; Bagdemir E.; Yildiz B.; Yumuk V.D.; Haliloglu O.; Sancak S.; Ozsari L.; Cagiltay E.; Deyneli O.; Imre E.; Gonen S.; Boysan S.N.; Altuntas Y.; Ozturk F.Y.; Mert M.; Piskinpasa H.; Aydin H.; Imamoglu S.; Ersoy C.; Gul O.O.; Kucuksarac Kiyici S.; Cetinarslan B.; Selek A.; Dogru T.; Kirik A.; Kebapci N.; Efe B.; Kaya A.; Cordan I.; Baldane S.; Kirac C.O.; Demirci I.; Capa Z.; Cesur M.; Yetkin I.; Corapcioglu D.; Canlar S.; Bulent Yildiz O.; Sendur S.N.; Cakir B.; Ozdemir D.; Corakci A.; Kutlu M.; Bascil Tutuncu N.; Bozkus Y.; Cakal E.; Demirbas B.; Ertek S.; Altay M.; Dagdeviren M.; Abedi A.H.; Cetinkalp S.; Ozisik H.; Oruk G.G.; Yener S.; Saydam B.O.; Guney E.; Unubol M.; Yaylali G.F.; Topsakal S.; Hekimsoy Z.; Akbaba G.; Aslan I.; Balci M.K.; Dalkiran S.; Akbay E.; Gul K.; Agbaht K.; Yilmaz M.O.; Bozkirli E.; Tetiker B.T.; Cetinkaya Altuntas S.; Atmaca A.; Durmuş E.T.; Mete T.; Kutluturk F.; Kucukler F.K.; Dikbas O.; Akin S.; Nuhoglu I.; Ersoz H.O.; Bayraktaroglu T.; Sisman P.; Sahin I.; Cetin S.; Capoglu I.; Akbas E.M.; Ucler R.; Eren M.A.; Tuzcu A.K.; Pekkolay Z.; Ozkaya M.; Araz M.Aims: Turkey has the highest prevalence of diabetes in Europe. It is therefore essential to know the overall cardiovascular risk and reveal the predictors of metabolic control in Turkish adults with diabetes mellitus. Methods: A nationwide, multicenter survey consecutively enrolled patients who were under follow up for at least a year. Optimal control was defined as HbA1c < 7%, home arterial blood pressure (ABP) < 135/85 mmHg, or LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. Achieving all parameters indicated triple metabolic control. Results: HbA1c levels of patients (n = 5211) were 8.6 ± 1.9% (71 ± 22 mmol/mol) and 7.7 ± 1.7% (61 ± 19 mmol/mol), in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Glycemic control was achieved in 15.3% and 40.2%, and triple metabolic control was achieved in 5.5% and 10.1%, respectively. Only 1.5% of patients met all the criteria of being non-obese, non-smoker, exercising, and under triple metabolic control. Low education level was a significant predictor of poor glycemic control in both groups. Conclusions: Few patients with Type 2, and even fewer with Type 1 diabetes have optimal metabolic control in Turkey. TEMD study will provide evidence-based information to policy makers to focus more on the quality and sustainability of diabetes care in order to reduce the national burden of the disease. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.Item Utilization of statins and LDL-cholesterol target attainment in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes - a nationwide cross-sectional study (TEMD dyslipidemia study)(BioMed Central Ltd, 2020) Bayram F.; Sonmez A.; Haymana C.; Sabuncu T.; Dizdar O.S.; Gurkan E.; Carlioglu A.K.; Agbaht K.; Ozdemir D.; Demirci I.; Barcin C.; Salman S.; Tetiker T.; Balci M.K.; Kebapci N.; Ersoy C.; Yumuk V.; Toth P.P.; Satman I.; Guldiken S.; Ayturk S.; Yilmaz M.; Asik M.; Dinccag N.; Cakmak R.; Turker F.; Idiz C.; Hacisahinogullari H.; Bagdemir E.; Yildiz B.; Haliloglu O.; Sancak S.; Ozsari L.; Cagiltay E.; Deyneli O.; Imre E.; Gonen S.; Boysan S.N.; Altuntas Y.; Ozturk F.Y.; Mert M.; Piskinpasa H.; Aydin H.; Imamoglu S.; Gul O.O.; Kiyici S.K.; Cetinarslan B.; Selek A.; Dogru T.; Kirik A.; Efe B.; Kaya A.; Cordan I.; Baldane S.; Kirac C.O.; Capa Z.; Cesur M.; Yetkin I.; Corapcioglu D.; Canlar S.; Yildiz O.B.; Sendur S.N.; Cakir B.; Corakci A.; Kutlu M.; Tutuncu N.B.; Bozkus Y.; Cakal E.; Demirbas B.; Ertek S.; Altay M.; Dagdeviren M.; Abedi A.H.; Cetinkalp S.; Ozisik H.; Oruk G.G.; Yener S.; Saydam B.O.; Guney E.; Unubol M.; Yaylali G.F.; Topsakal S.; Hekimsoy Z.; Akbaba G.; Aslan I.; Dalkiran S.; Akbay E.; Gul K.; Yilmaz M.O.; Bozkirli E.; Altuntas S.C.; Atmaca A.; Durmuş E.T.; Mete T.; Kutluturk F.; Kucukler F.K.; Dikbas O.; Akin S.; Nuhoglu I.; Ersoz H.O.; Bayraktaroglu T.; Sisman P.; Sahin I.; Cetin S.; Capoglu I.; Akbas E.M.; Ucler R.; Eren M.A.; Tuzcu A.K.; Pekkolay Z.; Ozkaya M.; Araz M.Background: Attaining acceptable levels of LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The LDL-C target attainment and the characteristics of patients attaining these targets were investigated in this study. Furthermore, the reasons for not choosing statins and the physicians’ attitudes on the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia were also examined. Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted in tertiary centers for diabetes management. Adult patients with T2DM, who were under follow-up for at least a year in outpatient clinics, were consecutively enrolled for the study. LDL-C goals were defined as below 70 mg/dL for patients with macrovascular complications or diabetic nephropathy, and below 100 mg/dL for other patients. Data about lipid-lowering medications were self-reported. Results: A total of 4504 patients (female: 58.6%) were enrolled for the study. The mean HbA1c and diabetes duration was 7.73 ± 1.74% and 10.9 ± 7.5 years, respectively. The need for statin treatment was 94.9% (n = 4262); however, only 42.4% (n = 1807) of these patients were under treatment, and only 24.8% (n = 448) of these patients achieved LDL-C targets. The main reason for statin discontinuation was negative media coverage (87.5%), while only a minority of patients (12.5%) mentioned side effects. Physicians initiated lipid-lowering therapy in only 20.3% of patients with high LDL-C levels. It was observed that the female gender was a significant independent predictor of not attaining LDL-C goals (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59–0.83). Conclusions: Less than 50 % of patients with T2DM who need statins were under treatment, and only a quarter of them attained their LDL-C targets. There exists a significant gap between the guideline recommendations and the real-world evidence in the treatment of dyslipidemia in T2DM. © 2020, The Author(s).Item Effectiveness and Safety of Initiation and Titration of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in Insulin-Naive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled on Oral Antidiabetic Drug Treatment in Turkey: The EASE Study(AVES, 2024) Çetinarslan B.; Çetinkalp Ş.; Kaya A.; Ersoy C.; Kebapçı N.; Çömlekçi A.; Tütüncü N.B.; Deyneli O.; Oğuz A.; İlkova H.; Yılmaz T.; Hekimsoy Z.; Ünübol M.; Balcı M.K.; Atmaca A.; Dağdelen S.; Yetkin İ.; Güler S.; Ötünç G.; Özhan L.Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ mL (Gla-300) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drug (OADs) treatment in Turkey. Methods: One hundred eight patients from 20 centers enrolled in the study. Starting from baseline, Gla-300 was self-administered subcutaneously and once daily in the evening. The primary outcome was the mean change in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24. Results: The mean (±SD) Hb1Ac level of 9.4% (±0.8) at baseline decreased to 7.5% (±0.9) at week 12 (P <.1) and to 7.3% (±0.9) at week 24 (P <.1). Although none of the patients were within the target Hb1Ac level of ≤7% at baseline, the percentage of patients who achieved the target Hb1Ac level was 30.4% at week 12 and increased to 42.9% at week 24. Gla-300 treatment achieved the Hb1Ac target in 21 (19.4%) patients without experiencing a hypoglycemic event and in 27 (25.0%) patients who experienced at least one hypoglycemic event. For each self-monitoring blood glucose time point, significant improvements were observed as compared to baseline (P <.001). Statistically significant improvement (P <.001) was seen in the treatment satisfaction questionnaire – status version scores between baseline and week 24. Conclusion: This study indicated that Gla-300 is effective to provide a successful glycemic control with low risk of hypoglycemia added to OADs in insulin-naive patients with T2DM, and it has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients. © Author(s).