Browsing by Author "Duran, AO"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Retrospective evaluation of patients diagnosed solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreasErcelep, O; Ozdemir, N; Turan, N; Topcu, TO; Uysal, M; Tanriverdi, O; Demirci, U; Taskoylu, BY; Urakci, Z; Duran, AO; Aksoy, A; Menekse, S; Ozcelik, M; Gumus, MPurpose: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare, low-grade neoplasm with excellent prognosis. In this study, we evaluated clinicopathological characteristics of patients diagnosed with SPN retrospectively. Methods: This is a retrospective study intended to characterize patients with the diagnosis of SPN between 2005 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, recurrence rate, and overall survival of 28 patients were recorded. Malignant SPN criteria were defined as the presence of distant metastasis (developed at diagnosis or during follow up) or lymph node involvement. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 42 (range: 17-41). Among patients, 82% (n = 23) were female and 17.9% (n = 5) were male. The mean size of tumor was 5.81 cm (range: 2-15). The mean follow up period was 55.6 months, 1-year survival was 96.5% and 5-year survival rate was 88%. A total of 25 patients were alive at the end of follow-up period and 3 of the patients became exitus due to disease. Two patients had a metastatic presentation in livers at the diagnosis and metastasis developed in 3 patients during follow-up (liver of 1 patient, peritoneum in 1 patient and liver and peritoneum in 1 patient). The reason of admission was headache in 68% patients. The type of operation was frequently subtotal pancreatectomy (n = 11, 39.3%) and distal pancreatectomy (n = 10, 35.7%). Tumors were located frequently in body and tail regions (n = 18, 64.3%) and the number of patients with malignant criteria was 6 (21.4%). Although the mean age of malignant patients was significantly higher than benign patients (P = 0.046), there was no significant difference between 2 groups in terms of gender, tumor size, capsule invasion, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and margin status. Conclusion: SPN is a rarely seen tumor with low malignity potential. Surgical resection provides long-term survival rate even in local invasion or metastasis conditions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Item The effect of the gastrectomy on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a study of ASMOYazici, O; Özdemir, N; Duran, AO; Menekse, S; Ali, M; Sendur, N; Karaca, H; Göksel, G; Arpaci, E; Hacibekiroglu, I; Bilgetekin, I; Kaçan, T; Özkan, M; Aksoy, S; Aksoy, A; Çokmert, S; Uysal, M; Elkiran, ET; Çiçin, I; Büyükberber, S; Zengin, NAim: To investigate the role of surgical resection of primary tumor on overall survival (OS) in advanced gastric cancer patients at the time of diagnosis. Patients & methods: The survival rates of metastatic gastric cancer patients whose gastric primary tumor was resected at time of diagnosis were compared with metastatic gastric cancer patients whose primary tumor was nonresected. Results: The median progression-free survival and OS in operated and nonoperated group were 10 versus 6, 14 versus 9 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, gastric resection of primary tumor, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, second-line chemotherapy had a significant effect on OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.38-0.71], HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.42-0.78], HR: 1.48 [1.09-2.01]; p <= 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively). Conclusion: Subpopulations of patients with metastatic gastric cancer might benefit from surgical removal of primary tumor.Item Comparison of survival with somatostatin analog and chemotherapy and prognostic factors for treatment in 165 advanced neuroendocrine tumor patients with Ki-67 20% or lessÖzaslan, E; Karaca, H; Koca, S; Sevinç, A; Hacioglu, B; Özkan, M; Özçelik, M; Duran, AO; Hacibekiroglu, I; Yildiz, Y; Tanriverdi, Ö; Menekse, S; Aksoy, A; Bozkurt, O; Urvay, S; Uysal, M; Demir, H; Çiltas, A; Dane, FThe objectives of this study were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) with somatostatin analog (SSA) versus chemotherapy (CTx) in first-line therapy and to determine the patient group in which these treatments were more effective in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with a Ki-67 index of 20% or less. Patients who received SSA or CTx and had unresectable locally advanced and metastatic NETs with a Ki-67 index of 20% or less were retrospectively selected from 13 centers in the Turkish database between 2000 and 2015. One hundred and sixty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years and the male-to-female ratio was 1.09. Seventy-four (45%) patients were of grade 1 NET and 91 (55%) were of grade 2. SSA was given to 104 patients, whereas 61 were treated with CTx. The objective response rate after SSA was 15.4%; another 73.1% had stable disease. The objective response rate after CTx was 36.1%, and 40.9% had stable disease (P = 0.008). The median PFS in SSA patients was 21 months (95% confidence interval: 12.4-29.6), and 8 months for CTx (95% confidence interval: 5.5-10.6) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between PFS of receiving SSA and CTx in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients; however, the PFS of receiving SSA was longer in non-PNET patients (P < 0.001). SSA was better treatment in advanced NET patients with a Ki-67 index of less than 5%, having a primary resected and a performance status of 0 (P < 0.05). SSA may be preferred over CTx in advanced NET patients with low-to-intermediate grade. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.Item The role of the gastrectomy on survival in metastatic gastric cancer patients: A multicenter study of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology (ASMO)Yazici, O; Ozdemir, N; Duran, AO; Menekse, S; Sendur, MAN; Karaca, H; Goksel, G; Arpaci, E; Eren, T; Hacibekiroglu, I; Bilgetekin, I; Kacan, T; Ozkan, M; Aksoy, S; Aksoy, A; Zengin, NItem XELOX Plus Bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical OncologyDuran, AO; Karaca, H; Besiroglu, M; Bayoglu, IV; Menekse, S; Yapici, HS; Yazilitas, D; Bahceci, A; Uysal, M; Sevinc, A; Hacibekiroglu, I; Aksoy, A; Tanriverdi, O; Arpaci, E; Inanc, M; Dane, F; Ozkan, MBackground: XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC. Materials and Methods: A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n=111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%), stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95% CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95% CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p=0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95% CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95% CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p=0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev.Item Comparison of Somatostatin Analogue (SA) and Chemotherapy (CT) in Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) Patients with Ki-67 ≤20%Özaslan, E; Koca, S; Sevinç, A; Hacioglu, B; Özçelik, M; Duran, AO; Yildiz, Y; Tanriverdi, Ö; Menekse, S; Aksoy, A; Elmaci, S; Uysal, M; Çiltas, AItem Prognostic factors of patients who received chemotherapy after cranial irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A retrospective analysis of multicenter study (Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology)Inal, A; Kodaz, H; Odabas, H; Duran, AO; Seker, MM; Inanc, M; Elkiran, ET; Gunaydin, Y; Menekse, S; Topcu, TO; Urakci, Z; Tastekin, D; Bilici, M; Cihan, S; Geredeli, C; Sezer, E; Uncu, D; Arpaci, E; Ozturk, B; Bal, O; Uysal, M; Tanriverdi, O; Gumus, M; Ustaalioglu, BBO; Suner, A; Cokmert, S; Hacibekiroglu, I; Aydin, K; Isikdogan, APurpose: Almost half of all patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have distant metastases at presentation. One-third of patients with NSCLC will have brain metastases. Without effective treatment, the median survival is only 1 month. However, it is difficult to treat brain metastases with systemic chemotherapy since the agents have difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, it is important to estimate the patient's survival prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival in Turkish patients who received chemotherapy after cranial irradiation for NSCLC with brain metastases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 698 patients with brain metastases resulting from NSCLC. Ten potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). Results: Among the 10 variables for univariate analysis, six were identified to have prognostic significance; these included sex, smoking history, histology, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection. Multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model showed that a smoking history, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion: Smoking history, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection were considered independent negative prognostic factors for OS. These findings may facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and can be used for selecting patients for more appropriate treatment options.