Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All Contents
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Erkekol, FÖ"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Trends in prescribing montelukast in patients with asthma in real-life: Results from the Turkish adult asthma registry
    Beyaz, S; Erdinç, M; Hayme, S; Aslan, AF; Aydin,Ö; Gökmen, D; Buhari, GK; Sözener, ZC; Gemicioglu, B; Bulut, I; Örçen, C; Özdemir, SK; Keren, M; Damadoglu, E; Yakut, T; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Baccioglu, A; Yalim, SA; Yilmaz, I; Kalkan, IK; Uysal, MA; Niksarlioglu, EYÖ; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Erbay, M; Nayci, S; Tepetam, FM; Gelincik, AA; Dirol, H; Göksel,Ö; Karaoglanoglu, S; Erkekol, FÖ; Isik, SR; Yildiz, F; Yavuz, Y; Karadogan, D; Bozkurt, N; Seker,Ü; Oguzülgen, IK; Basyigit, I; Baris, SA; Uçar, EY; Erdogan, T; Polatli, M; Ediger, D; Günaydin, FE; Türk, M; Pür, L; Katran, ZY; Sekibag, Y; Aykaç, EF; Mungan, D; Gül,Ö; Cengiz, A; Akkurt, B; Özden, S; Demir, S; Ünal, D; Can, A; Guemuesburun, R; Bogatekin, G; Akten, HS; Inan, S; Ögüs, AC; Kavas, M; Yulug, DP; Çakmak, ME; Kaya, SB; Alpagat, G; Özgür, ES; Uzun, O; Gülen, ST; Pekbak, G; Kizilirmak, D; Havlucu, Y; Doenmez, H; Arslan, B; Çetin, GP; Soyyigit, S; Kara, BY; Karakis, GP; Dursun, AB; Kendirlinan, R; Öztürk, AB; Sevinç, C; Simsek, GÖ; Abadoglu,Ö; Çerçi, P; Yücel, T; Yorulmaz, I; Tezcaner, ZÇ; Tatar, EÇ; Süslü, AE; Özer, S; Dursun, E; Yorgancioglu, A; Çelik, GE
    Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) approved for the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis, is widely used, though real-world data on its application in asthma management remain limited. This registry-based study evaluated the use of montelukast in adult asthma patients, examining demographic and disease characteristics, asthma control status, asthma phenotypes, presence of atopy, and treatment regimens. Among 2053 patients analyzed, 61.76% (n = 1268; mean age: 46.2 +/- 14.3 years), predominantly females (similar to 76%), received montelukast. Montelukast users showed higher rates of allergic rhinitis (P < 0.001), hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (P = 0.008), and chronic rhinosinusitis (P = 0.008). Montelukast group also had higher atopy and total IgE levels and tended to be more eosinophilic. Montelukast was commonly preferred in allergic, eosinophilic, NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease, and severe asthma phenotypes (P < 0.001). Patients receiving Steps 4 and 5 treatments are more likely to be prescribed montelukast (P < 0.001). Montelukast usage was higher among patients with uncontrolled asthma [ACT< 20 (OR:1.29, 95%CI:1.052-1.582, P = 0.014)]. In addition, logistic regression analyses identified the main factors associated with increased montelukast use as; female gender (OR:1.33, 95%CI:1.041-1.713, P = 0.02), presence of atopy (OR:1.46, 95%CI:1.157-1.864, P = 0.002), comorbid allergic rhinitis (OR:2.12, 95%CI:1.679-2.293, P < 0.001), and severe asthma (OR:2.18, 95%CI:1.712-2.784, P < 0.001). These findings reveal that montelukast use is prevalent among asthma patients, particularly in females, middle-aged adults, and those with comorbid allergic rhinitis, uncontrolled asthma, or specific asthma phenotypes, underscoring the factors that influence its prescription in asthma management. (c) 2025 Codon Publications. Published by Codon Publications.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Long-Term Omalizumab Treatment: A Multicenter, Real-Life, 5-Year Trial
    Yorgancioglu, A; Erkekol, FÖ; Mungan, D; Erdinç, M; Gemicioglu, B; Özseker, ZF; Degirmenci, PB; Nayci, S; Çilli, A; Erdenen, F; Kirmaz, C; Ediger, D; Yalçin, AD; Büyüköztürk, S; Öztürk, S; Güleç, M; Isik, SR; Kalyoncu, AF; Göksel, Ö; Aydin, O; Havlucu, Y; Ar, IB; Erdogdu, A
    Background: Omalizumab has demonstrated therapeutic benefits both in controlled clinical trials and real-life studies. However, research concerning the long-term effects and tolerability of omalizumab is needed. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of treatment with omalizumab for up to 5 years. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, chart-based study was carried out to compare documented exacerbations, hospitalizations, systemic steroid requirement, FEV1, and asthma control test (ACT) results during 1 year prior to omalizumab treatment versus at 1, 3, and 5 years of treatment. Adverse events and reasons for discontinuation were also recorded at each time point. Results: Four hundred and sixty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Outcome variables had improved after the 1st year and were sustained after the 3rd and 5th years of treatment with omalizumab. Omalizumab treatment reduced the asthma exacerbation rate by 71.3% (p < 0.001) at 1 year, 64.3% (p < 0.001) at 3 years, and 54.8% (p = 0.002) at 5 years. The hospitalization rate also decreased; by the 5th year of the treatment no patients were hospitalized. ACT results had also improved significantly: 12 (p < 0.001) at 1 year, 12 (p < 0.001) at 3 years, and 12 (p = 0.002) at 5 years. Overall, 12.7% of patients reported adverse events (most of these were mild-to-moderate) and the overall dropout rate was 9.0%. Conclusion: Omalizumab had a significant effect on asthma outcomes and this effect was maintained over 5 years. The drug was found to be generally safe and treatment compliance was good. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Drug allergy in tertiary care in Turkey: Results of a national survey. The ADAPT study: Adult drug allergy perception in Turkey
    Çelik, GE; Karakaya, G; Öztürk, AB; Gelincik, A; Abadoglu, Ö; Sin, A; Damadoglu, E; Yilmaz, I; Demirtürk, M; Dursun, B; Özdemir, SK; Çelikel, S; Degirmenci, P; Bozkurt, B; Göksel, Ö; Erkekol, FÖ; Aydin, Ö; Kavut, AB; Kirmaz, C; Kalpaklioglu, F; Büyüköztürk, S; Kalyoncu, F
    Background: No data are available on the incidence of drug hypersensitivity (DH) reactions in outpatient settings of tertiary allergy/immunology clinics. Our aims were to document the frequency of outpatient hospital admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/immunology clinics in adults and the management of these reactions in real life. We also investigated whether drug allergy affected social and medical behaviours of the patients. Methods: This multi-centre study was performed for one year with the participation of 11 out of 16 tertiary allergy/clinical immunology clinics in Turkey. The study group consisted of the patients with DH reactions. Results of a questionnaire including drug reactions and management were recorded. Results: Among 54,863 patients, 1000 patients with DH were enrolled with a median of 2.1% of all admissions. In real life conditions, the majority of approaches were performed for finding safe alternatives (65.5%; 1102 out of 1683) with 11.7% positivity. Diagnostic procedures were positive in 27% (154/581) of the patients. The majority of the patients had higher VAS scores for anxiety. A total of 250 subjects (25%) reported that they delayed some medical procedures because of DH. Conclusion: Our results documented the frequency of admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/clinical immunology clinics for the first time. Although physicians mostly preferred to perform drug tests in order to find safe alternatives, considering the fact that DH was confirmed in 27% of the patients, use of diagnostic tests should be encouraged, if no contraindication exists in order to avoid mislabelling patients as DH. (C) 2013 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Assessing the knowledge in primary health care following an educational course structured in the context of GARD chronic airway diseases national control program
    Erkekol, FÖ; Köktürk, N; Mungan, D; Saçkesen, C; Önen, ZP; Özkan, S; Balkan, A; Ergün, P; Kocabas, CN; Aksakal, NB; Ekici, B; Altunay, ZÖ; GemIcIoglu, B; Yorgancioglu, A
    Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases are common causes of disease in the community and account for considerable percent of the caseload in primary health care facilities. For this reason, it is important to question and improve the knowledge of primary health care physicians. This study is designed to assess the level of knowledge for bronchial asthma and COPD of the primary healthcare physicians, both before and immediately after an educational course structured in the context of GARD Chronic Airway Diseases National Control Program. Materials and Methods: The participating physicians attended an intensive educational course on asthma and COPD. Twenty five item questionnaires for asthma and COPD were administered to the participants both before and immediately after the end of the course. Contribution of education to the level of knowledge was investigated by comparing the percentages of the correct answers in the pre-and post-test. Results: From 11 different cities, 1817 and 1788 primary health care physician were attended to the asthma and COPD educations, respectively. The accuracy rate of >= 75% was obtained from only 4 questions in pre-test asthma questionnaire. On the contrary, in 15 questions the accuracy rate was < 50%. The mean accuracy rate for the whole asthma test was 45.8%, and this rate raised to 69.6% after education course. The accuracy rate of >= 75% could not be obtained from any of the questions in pre-test COPD questionnaire. On the contrary, in 19 questions the accuracy rate was < 50%. The mean accuracy rate for the whole asthma test was 42.0%, and this rate raised to 71.3% after education course. Conclusion: It has been shown that, in primary care settings, the level of knowledge in asthma and COPD should be enhanced and that this increase can be achieved with an education course.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Stepwise Approach in Asthma Revisited 2023: Expert Panel Opinion of Turkish Guideline of Asthma Diagnosis and Management Group
    Çelik, GE; Aydin, Ö; Damadoglu, E; Baççioglu, A; Özdemir, SK; Bavbek, S; Ediger, D; Erkekol, FÖ; Gemicioglu, B; Isik, SR; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Keren, M; Mungan, D; Oguzülgen, IK; Yildiz, F; Yilmaz, I; Yorgancioglu, A
    Introduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been the cornerstone of the long-term management of asthma. ICSs either alone or in combination with long-acting beta-2 agonists have been shown to be associated with favorable asthma outcomes. However, asthma con-trol is still reported to be below expectations all around the world. Research in the last decades focusing on the use of ICS/formoterol both as maintenance and as needed (maintenance and reliever therapy approach) showed improved asthma outcomes. As a result of recent developments, Turkish Asthma Guidelines group aimed to revise asthma treatment recommendations. In general, we recommend physi-cians to consider the risk factors for poor asthma outcomes, patients' compliance and expectations and then to determine a personalized treatment plan. Importantly, the use of short-acting beta-2 agonists alone as a symptom reliever in asthma patients not using regular ICS is no longer recommended. In stepwise treatment approach, we primarily recommend to use ICS-based controllers and initiate ICS as soon as possible. We define 2 different treatment tracks in stepwise approaches as maintenance and reliever therapy or fixed-dose therapy and equally recommend each track depending on the patient's risks as well as decision of physicians in a personalized manner. For both tracks, a strong recommendation was made in favor of using add-on treatments before initiating phenotype-specific treatment in step 5. A strong recommendation was also made in favor of using biologic agents and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization in severe asthma when indicated.

Manisa Celal Bayar University copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback