Browsing by Author "Ermiş Ç."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Reliability and Validity of the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale-Full Prospective in Its Turkish Translation
    (Mary Ann Liebert Inc., 2022) Sapmaz S.Y.; Ermiş Ç.; Çaklr B.; Öztekin S.; Guinart D.; Alşen Güney S.; Correll C.U.; Inal N.; Aydemir Ö.
    Editors' Note: The Editors would like to address issues related to the acceptance of this manuscript. The original manuscript referenced the study tool as the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview Scale-Prospective (BPSS-P). After the manuscript's initial acceptance, the authors requested a revision of the tool name to Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview Scale-Full Perspective (BPSS-FP). When this request was made, the original acceptance was rescinded, and the authors were asked to formally revise and resubmit the manuscript with an explanation for the change. This revision and subsequent review led to the final acceptance of the manuscript. The authors have assured us that the tool used in the manuscript was the BPSS-FP (version 5) as opposed to abbreviated forms of this tool that are also used in research (e.g., Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale-Abbreviated Screen for Patients (BPSS-AS-P). Background: No scale exists to assess patients at-risk for bipolar disorder (BD) in Turkey. We aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale-Full Prospective (BPSS-FP). Method: Psychiatric service users aged 11-18 years old were interviewed using the BPSS-FP translated into Turkish and the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Youth with major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 63), bipolar-spectrum disorder (n = 47), and healthy controls (n = 122) were included. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) were administered to test convergent/discriminant validity. Discriminant validity was further tested using one-way ANOVA and "receiver operating characteristic"(ROC) curves. Inter-rater reliability was tested using correlation coefficients. Findings: Across 232 youth, Cronbach's alpha values were 0.932 for the BPSS-FP total score, 0.878 for the Mania Symptom Index, 0.887 for the Depression Symptom Index, and 0.797 for the General Symptom Index. Correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability were high for the Mania Symptom Index (r = 0.989), Depression Symptom Index (r = 0.973), and General Symptom Index (r = 0.981). There were high correlations between the BPSS-FP Mania Symptom Index subscore and YMRS (r = 0.732), and the BPSS-FP Depression Symptom Index subscore and CDRS-R (r = 0.754), whereas cross-polarity correlations were non-significant. ROC analysis cut-off value was ≥21 for the BPSS-FP Mania Symptom Index between patients with BD and MDD (specificity = 85.7%, sensitivity = 78.7%). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the BPSS-FP has good psychometric properties and can be used in research. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the predictive value of the BPSS-FP. © Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The role of predominant polarity on cognitive dysfunctions in patients with bipolar disorder
    (Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2024) Atay E.; Ermiş Ç.; Gökbayrak Atay İ.N.; Aydemir Ö.; Özmen E.
    Background: Cognitive impairment is frequently observed in bipolar disorder (BD). Previous findings indicated that predominant polarity could have an effect on cognitive deficits. This study aimed to examine the association between predominant polarity and cognitive impairments in BD. Materials and methods: Euthymic BD patients with manic (MPP, n = 31), depressive (DPP, n = 25), undetermined predominant polarity (UPP, n = 28), and healthy controls (HC, n = 27) participated in the study. A battery of neurocognitive and social cognitive tests was implemented. Neurocognitive domains were identified via principal component analysis. Results: The MPP group performed worse in the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and Hinting Test (HT) compared to the DPP group and reasoning/problem-solving skills compared to the UPP group. Both MPP and UPP groups showed impairments in processing speed compared to HC. Among patient groups, there was no significant difference in working memory, attention, processing speed, verbal, and visual domain scores. The MPP group had poorer scores compared to controls in most of the social cognitive and neurocognitive domains in the study, while the overall cognitive impairment in the DPP group was relatively milder. Conclusions: Although our sample size was relatively small, the MPP group yielded more severe cognitive impairment in verbal fluency and social cognition tests compared to DPP. Patients with MPP are particularly vulnerable to cognitive impairment, making them a priority for cognitive enhancement interventions. Future studies should focus on the outcomes of cognitive and pharmacological interventions in these polarity subgroups. © The Author(s) 2024.