Browsing by Author "Gumus M."

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Organic cucumber growing in the greenhouse
    (International Society for Horticultural Science, 2007) Tüzel Y.; Gül A.; Karacanci A.; Anac D.; Okur B.; Ongun A.R.; Yoldas Z.; Madanlar N.; Gumus M.; Tüzel I.H.; Engindeniz S.
    This study was conducted in order to elucidate the problems in organic greenhouse cucumber growing. Two dosages of farmyard manure (15 or 30 tons ha-1) were tested during autumn and spring seasons of 2003 and 2004. Fruit samples were analyzed for their quality parameters (color and total dry matter content of fruits and total soluble solids, EC and pH of fruit juice) at three weeks intervals during the harvest period. Generally, there were no significant differences with respect to fruit properties between manure dosages in both growing seasons. Higher yield was in the farmyard manure application of 15 ton ha-1 (5.92 kg/m2) compared to the application of 30 ton ha-1 (3.95 kg/m2) in autumn season, whereas higher total yield (17.84 kg/m2) was obtained from the plants grown by the application of 30 ton ha-1 farmyard manure in spring, but the difference between treatments was not statistically significant.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Gemcitabine Alone versus combination of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for the Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of multicenter study
    (SAP - Slovak Academic Press, spol. s.r.o., 2012) Inal A.; Kos F.T.; Algin E.; Yildiz R.; Dikiltas M.; Unek I.T.; Colak D.; Elkiran E.T.; Helvaci K.; Geredeli C.; Dane F.; Balakan O.; Kaplan M.A.; Durnali A.G.; Harputoglu H.; Goksel G.; Ozdemir N.; Buyukberber S.; Gumus M.; Kucukoner M.; Ozkan M.; Uncu D.; Benekli M.; Isikdogan A.
    The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer is of advanced disease. Several randomized Phase II and III trials suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) response rates were higher than Gemcitabine (Gem) alone, however the trials were not enough powered to indicate a statistically significant prolongation of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study is to evaluated the efficiency of Gem alone versus GemCis in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A total of 406 patients, from fourteen centers were evaluated retrospectively. All patients received Gem or GemCis as first-line treatment between September 2005 to March 2011. Primary end of this study were to evaluate the toxicity, clinical response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the arms. There were 156 patients (M: 98, F: 58) in Gem arm and 250 patients (M: 175, F: 75) in the combination arm. Gemcitabin arm patients older than the combination arm (median 63 vs 57.5, p=0.001). In patients with the combination arm had a higher dose reduction (25.2% vs 11.3%, p=0.001) and dose delay (34% vs 16.8%, p=0.001). Among patients with the combination and Gemcitabin arm gender, diabetes mellitus, performance status, cholestasis, grade, stage did not have a statistically difference (p>0.05). Clinical response rate to the combination arm was higher than the Gem arm (69.0% vs 49.7%, p=0.001). PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance (8.9 vs 6.0, p=0.08). OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm (12.0 vs 10.2, p>0.05). Grade III-IV hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were higher in the combination arm. PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance. OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin: Retrospective analysis of a multicenter study
    (2012) Inal A.; Kos F.T.; Algin E.; Yildiz R.; Berk V.; Tugba Unek I.; Colak D.; Kucukoner M.; Tamer Elkiran E.; Helvaci K.; Geredeli C.; Dane F.; Balakan O.; Ali Kaplan M.; Gok Durnali A.; Harputoglu H.; Goksel G.; Ozdemir N.; Buyukberber S.; Gumus M.; Ozkan M.; Benekli M.; Isikdogan A.
    Purpose: The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced disease. Systemic chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer has limited impact on overall survival (OS). Patients eligible for chemotherapy should be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 343 locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who were treated with gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy between December 2000 and June 2011. Fifteen potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. Univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to determine prognostic factors. Results: Among the 15 variables of univariate analysis, 6 were identified to have prognostic significance: stage (p<0.001), cholestasis (p=0.02), weight loss, prior pancreatectomy, serum CEA level (p<0.001) and serum CA19-9 level (p<0.001). In addition, age, chemotherapy and liver metastasis were of borderline significance (p=0.06). Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) included the 6 significant prognostic factors ofunivariate analysis and showed that stage was independent prognostic factor for OS, as were weight loss, and serum CEA level. Conclusion: Stage, weight loss, and serum CEA level were identified as important prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. These findings may also facilitate pretreatment prediction of OS and can be used for selecting patients for treatment. © 2012 Zerbinis Medical Publications.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Predictive factors for the development of brain metastases in patients with malignant melanoma: A study by the Anatolian society of medical oncology
    (2014) Gumusay O.; Coskun U.; Akman T.; Ekinci A.S.; Kocar M.; Erceleb O.B.; Yazici O.; Kaplan M.A.; Berk V.; Cetin B.; Taskoylu B.Y.; Yildiz A.; Goksel G.; Alacacioglu A.; Demirci U.; Algin E.; Uysal M.; Oztop I.; Oksuzoglu B.; Dane F.; Gumus M.; Buyukberber S.
    Background: The development of brain metastases (BMs) was associated with poor prognosis in melanoma patients. Patients with BMs have a median survival of <6 months. Melanoma is the third most common tumor to metastasize to the brain with a reported incidence of 10-40 %. Our aim was to identify factors predicting development of BMs and survival. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 470 melanoma patients between 2000 and 2012. The logistic regression analyses were used to identify the clinicopathological features of primary melanoma that are predictive of BMs development and survival after a diagnosis of brain metastases. Results: There were 52 patients (11.1 %) who developed melanoma BMs during the study period. The analysis of post-BMs with Kaplan-Meier curves has resulted in a median survival rate of 4.1 months (range 2.9-5.1 months). On logistic regression analysis site of the primary tumor on the head and neck (p = 0.002), primary tumor thickness (Breslow >4 mm) (p = 0.008), ulceration (p = 0.007), and pathologically N2 and N3 diseases (p = 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with the development of BMs. In univariate analysis, tumor thickness and performance status had a significant influence on post-BMs survival. In multivariate analysis, these clinicopathologic factors were not remained as significant predictive factors. Conclusions: Our results revealed the importance of primary tumor characteristics associated with the development of BMs. Ulceration, primary tumor thickness, anatomic site, and pathologic ≥N2 disease were found to be significant predictors of BMs development. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of prognostic factors in localized high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: report of a multi-institutional experience of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology
    (Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2016) Ozcelik M.; Seker M.; Eraslan E.; Koca S.; Yazilitas D.; Ercelep O.; Ozaslan E.; Kaya S.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Menekse S.; Aksoy A.; Taskoylu B.Y.; Varol U.; Arpaci E.; Ciltas A.; Oksuzoglu B.; Zengin N.; Gumus M.; Aliustaoglu M.
    Most data on prognostic factors for patients with high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (HGUPS) is obtained from analyses of soft tissue sarcomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and their impact on outcomes specifically in patients diagnosed with HGUPS. In this multicenter trial, we retrospectively analyzed 112 patients who were diagnosed and treated at 12 different institutions in Turkey. We collected data concerning the patients, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities. There were 69 males (61.6 %) and 43 females (38.4 %). Median age was 56 years (19–90). The most common anatomic site of tumor origin was the upper extremity. Pleomorphic variant was the predominant histological subtype. Median tumor size was 8.2 cm (0.6–30 cm). Tumors were mainly deeply seated (57.1 %). Fifty-seven patients (50.9 %) were stage II and the remainder were stage III at the time of diagnosis. Median follow-up was 30 months (2–160). The primary site of distant metastasis was the lung (73.5 %) and the second most common site was the liver (11.7 %). The 5-year overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival rates were 56.3, 53.4, and 67.2 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of II (p = 0.033), deep tumor location (p = 0.000), and development of distant metastasis (p = 0.004) were negatively correlated with overall survival, and perioperative radiotherapy and negative microscopic margins were significant factors for local control rates (p = 0.000 for each). Deep tumor location (p = 0.003) was the only adverse factor related to distant metastasis-free survival. Deep tumor location, ECOG performance score of II, and development of distant metastasis carry a poor prognostic implication on overall survival. These will aid clinicians in predicting survival and treatment decision. © 2015, International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Prognostic factors of patients who received chemotherapy after cranial irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A retrospective analysis of multicenter study (Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology)
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018) Inal A.; Kodaz H.; Odabas H.; Duran A.; Seker M.; Inanc M.; Elkiran E.; Gunaydin Y.; Menekse S.; Topcu T.; Urakci Z.; Tastekin D.; Bilici M.; Cihan S.; Geredeli C.; Sezer E.; Uncu D.; Arpaci E.; Ozturk B.; Bal O.; Uysal M.; Tanriverdi O.; Gumus M.; Oven Ustaalioglu B.; Suner A.; Cokmert S.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Aydin K.; Isikdogan A.
    Purpose: Almost half of all patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have distant metastases at presentation. One-third of patients with NSCLC will have brain metastases. Without effective treatment, the median survival is only 1 month. However, it is difficult to treat brain metastases with systemic chemotherapy since the agents have difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, it is important to estimate the patient's survival prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival in Turkish patients who received chemotherapy after cranial irradiation for NSCLC with brain metastases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 698 patients with brain metastases resulting from NSCLC. Ten potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). Results: Among the 10 variables for univariate analysis, six were identified to have prognostic significance; these included sex, smoking history, histology, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection. Multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model showed that a smoking history, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion: Smoking history, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection were considered independent negative prognostic factors for OS. These findings may facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and can be used for selecting patients for more appropriate treatment options. © 2017 Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.