Browsing by Author "Gunduz D.I."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The process of obtaining information about COVID-19 among students of physiotherapy and rehabilitation department
    (2025) Gunduz D.I.; Secer E.; Secer M.B.
    BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the process of obtaining information about COVID-19 infection among students of the Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation (DPR) by examining the topic of information seeking, information source preference, and factors influencing these preferences. METHODS: A total of 495/645 (76.74%) DPR students participated in the study. The data collection form prepared by the researchers was administered between May-June 2022 using face-to-face interview technique. Students' sociodemographic data (age, biological sex, body mass index) and the main topics they researched about COVID-19, information sources, and factors influencing their choice of sources were recorded. RESULTS: Students often preferred to use internet social media (61.00%) and sources they considered reliable (81.40%) to access basic clinical information about COVID-19 (the routes of transmission = 30.30%, the main symptoms = 26.30%, number of cases = 22.60%). While biological sex (pbiologicalsex) and class level (pclasslevel) influenced the choice of sources (pbiologicalsex=0.011; pclasslevel:0.0001) and the factors determining this choice (pbiologicalsex=0.011-0.022; pclasslevel=0.0001-0.005), topic preferences were only influenced by class level (pbiologicalsex>0.05; pclasslevel = 0.0001-0.022). CONCLUSION: DPR students should be supported with reliable and up-to-date social media-based digital content prepared by experts in the field about physiotherapy practice and with easy access to scientific data, even in the late stages of pandemic processes such as COVID-19, when the need for access to information is high due to their professional role. © 2025. The Author(s).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Adaptation of LASA sedentary behaviour questionnaire into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties in elderly individuals
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2025) Muratoglu M.; Çilga G.; Gunduz D.I.; Akin E.S.
    Objective: This study was conducted to adapt the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (LASA-SBQ) into Turkish. Turkish translation, validity and reliability studies were performed. Materials and methods: A total of 100 volunteers (50 female), aged 65 years and over (median age: 71.00), with a score of 23 for educated and 19 or above for uneducated, on the Mini Mental State Examination and the Barthel Index score of 61 or above were included in the study. Sociodemographic data of the participants were recorded with the evaluation form. LASA-SBQ, the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale and International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form were applied. SPSS 26.00 software was used for statistical analyses. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistical significance level. Cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was performed in accordance with the Beaton protocol. After the translation of the questionnaire, its psychometric properties were examined and validity and reliability analyses were performed. Results: The mean time spent by the participants as sedentary in a week was 9.390 ± 3.733 h. There was a correlation between the LASA-SBQ and the total score of the SBQ (Pearson r = 0.757; p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability of the LASA-SBQ was examined and the intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be 0.978. In order to examine the validity of the questionnaire together with the SBQ, Bland-Altman analysis was performed and a graph was drawn. Bland-Altman analysis shows that the validity of the questionnaire is high. Conclusion-Discussion: The LASA-SBQ was translated into Turkish and culturally adapted. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were examined and validity and reliability analyses were performed. The Turkish version of the LASA-SBQ is a valid and reliable scale and is suitable for use in scientific research. © The Author(s) 2025.