Browsing by Author "Guven, DC"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparison of the efficacy of sunitinib and pazopanib in patients with advanced non-clear renal cell carcinoma
    Yildirim, HC; Bayram, E; Chalabiyev, E; Majidova, N; Avci, T; Güzel, HG; Kapar, C; Uzun, M; Perkin, P; Akgül, F; Yildirim, SS; Sali, S; Yildiz, A; Kazaz, SN; Hendem, E; Arcagok, M; Tufan, G; Yildirim, U; Akgul, OF; Arslan, C; Taban, H; Sahin, E; Caglayan, M; Esen, R; Öksüzoglu, B; Guven, DC; Kaplan, MA; Araz, M; Basaran, M; Cubukcu, E; Gokmen, E; Cicin, I; Algin, E; Semiz, HS; Tural, D; Ozturk, B; Erdogan, AP; Sari, M; Kara, O; Erman, M
    Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease group, accounting for approximately 25% of all RCC cases. Due to its rarity and especially heterogeneity, phase III trial data is limited and treatment options generally follow those of clear cell RCC. In the literature, there exists a number of studies with sunitinib, cabozantinib, and everolimus, but data on the efficacy of pazopanib are limited. Our aim in this study was to compare the efficacy of pazopanib and sunitinib, in a multicenter retrospective cohort of non-ccRCC patients. Our study included patients diagnosed with non-ccRCC who received pazopanib or sunitinib treatment as first-line therapy from 22 tertiary hospitals. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rates of pazopanib and sunitinib treatments. Additionally, we investigated prognostic factors in non-ccRCC. PFS and response rates of sunitinib and pazopanib were found to be similar, while a numerical difference was observed in OS. Being 65 years and older, being in the intermediate or poor risk group according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, having liver metastases, presence of a sarcomatoid component, and having de novo metastatic disease were found to be significantly associated with shorter PFS. Pazopanib treatment appears to have similar efficacy in the treatment of non-ccRCC compared to sunitinib. Though randomized controlled trials are lacking and will probably be never be available, we suggest that pazopanib could be a preferred agent like sunitinib and cabozantinib. Pazopanib and sunitinib treatments show similar progression free survival, overall survival and objective response rate.IMDC risk group, liver metastasis, sarcomatoid component and de novo metastatic disease were determined as prognostic factors
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors and parameters affecting survival in elderly patients in age-subgroups: Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) retrospective study
    Kahraman, S; Hizal, M; Demirel, BC; Guven, DC; Gumusay, O; Uluc, BO; Bayram, E; Gulbagci, B; Yasar, A; Davarci, SE; Mocan, EE; Acar, O; Isik, D; Aydin, E; Karakas, Y; Ozcelik, M; Keser, M; Okutur, SK; Eren, O; Menekse, S; Aydin, D; Yilmaz, F; Dogan, O; Ozkanli, G; Yucel, H; Sunar, V; Aykan, MB; Ozdemir, O; Duman, BB; Keskinkilic, M; Sakalar, T; Inal, A; Karaoglanoglu, M; Aksoy, A; Er, MM; Turhal, NS; Kalkan, NO; Sendur, MAN
    Highly selective inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6is) have emerged as a standart of care for first- and second-line therapies in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. It has been reported that combination therapy is more effective than ET alone and is safe in elderly patients as well as young patients. Nevertheless, elderly and very old patients with HR+/HER2-MBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) combinations are relatively underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. To contribute to the literature, we investigated the real-world efficacy, factors associated with survival and the rates of adverse events (AEs) of the treatment with palbociclib or ribociclib plus ET in the HR+/HER2- MBC patient cohort over the age of 65 for age subgroups. In this retrospective study, 348 patients were divided into subgroups: 65-69 years old, 70-79 years old and 80 years and older. Median PFS (mPFS) for whole group was 18.3 (95% CI,14.3-22.3) months. There was no significant difference in mPFS between age groups (p = 0.75). The estimated median OS (mOS) was 39.5 (95% CI, 24.9-54.1) months and there was no significant difference between age groups (p = 0.15). There was a meaningfull numerical difference that did not reach statistical significance in patients who received CDK4/6i treatment as the first line for MBC. Grade 3-4 AEs were reported in 42.7% for the entire group, and neutropenia was the most common (37.3%). It can be concluded that combination therapy with palbociclib or ribociclib with an ET partner has similar efficacy and is safe among subgroups of older patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2-MBC.