Browsing by Author "Hacibekiroglu I."

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    XELOX plus bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab treatment for first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer: A retrospective study of the anatolian society of medical oncology
    (Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention, 2014) Duran A.O.; Karaca H.; Besiroglu M.; Bayoglu I.V.; Menekse S.; Yapici H.S.; Yazilitas D.; Bahceci A.; Uysal M.; Sevinc A.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Aksoy A.; Tanriverdi O.; Arpaci E.; Inanc M.; Dane F.; Ozkan M.
    Background: XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC. Materials and Methods: A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n = 111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%) , stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95%CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95%CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p = 0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95%CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95%CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p = 0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparison of survival with somatostatin analog and chemotherapy and prognostic factors for treatment in 165 advanced neuroendocrine tumor patients with Ki-67 20% or less
    (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2016) Özaslan E.; Karaca H.; Koca S.; Sevinc A.; Hacioglu B.; Özkan M.; Özcelik M.; Duran A.O.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Yildiz Y.; Tanriverdi O.; Menekse S.; Aksoy A.; Bozkurt O.; Urvay S.; Uysal M.; Demir H.; Ciltas A.; Dane F.
    The objectives of this study were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) with somatostatin analog (SSA) versus chemotherapy (CTx) in first-line therapy and to determine the patient group in which these treatments were more effective in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with a Ki-67 index of 20% or less. Patients who received SSA or CTx and had unresectable locally advanced and metastatic NETs with a Ki-67 index of 20% or less were retrospectively selected from 13 centers in the Turkish database between 2000 and 2015. One hundred and sixty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years and the male-to-female ratio was 1.09. Seventy-four (45%) patients were of grade 1 NET and 91 (55%) were of grade 2. SSA was given to 104 patients, whereas 61 were treated with CTx. The objective response rate after SSA was 15.4%; another 73.1% had stable disease. The objective response rate after CTx was 36.1%, and 40.9% had stable disease (P=0.008). The median PFS in SSA patients was 21 months (95% confidence interval: 12.4-29.6), and 8 months for CTx (95% confidence interval: 5.5-10.6) (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between PFS of receiving SSA and CTx in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients; however, the PFS of receiving SSA was longer in non-PNET patients (P<0.001). SSA was better treatment in advanced NET patients with a Ki-67 index of less than 5%, having a primary resected and a performance status of 0 (P<0.05). SSA may be preferred over CTx in advanced NET patients with low-to-intermediate grade. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of prognostic factors in localized high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: report of a multi-institutional experience of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology
    (Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2016) Ozcelik M.; Seker M.; Eraslan E.; Koca S.; Yazilitas D.; Ercelep O.; Ozaslan E.; Kaya S.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Menekse S.; Aksoy A.; Taskoylu B.Y.; Varol U.; Arpaci E.; Ciltas A.; Oksuzoglu B.; Zengin N.; Gumus M.; Aliustaoglu M.
    Most data on prognostic factors for patients with high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (HGUPS) is obtained from analyses of soft tissue sarcomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and their impact on outcomes specifically in patients diagnosed with HGUPS. In this multicenter trial, we retrospectively analyzed 112 patients who were diagnosed and treated at 12 different institutions in Turkey. We collected data concerning the patients, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities. There were 69 males (61.6 %) and 43 females (38.4 %). Median age was 56 years (19–90). The most common anatomic site of tumor origin was the upper extremity. Pleomorphic variant was the predominant histological subtype. Median tumor size was 8.2 cm (0.6–30 cm). Tumors were mainly deeply seated (57.1 %). Fifty-seven patients (50.9 %) were stage II and the remainder were stage III at the time of diagnosis. Median follow-up was 30 months (2–160). The primary site of distant metastasis was the lung (73.5 %) and the second most common site was the liver (11.7 %). The 5-year overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival rates were 56.3, 53.4, and 67.2 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of II (p = 0.033), deep tumor location (p = 0.000), and development of distant metastasis (p = 0.004) were negatively correlated with overall survival, and perioperative radiotherapy and negative microscopic margins were significant factors for local control rates (p = 0.000 for each). Deep tumor location (p = 0.003) was the only adverse factor related to distant metastasis-free survival. Deep tumor location, ECOG performance score of II, and development of distant metastasis carry a poor prognostic implication on overall survival. These will aid clinicians in predicting survival and treatment decision. © 2015, International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Prognostic factors of patients who received chemotherapy after cranial irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A retrospective analysis of multicenter study (Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology)
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018) Inal A.; Kodaz H.; Odabas H.; Duran A.; Seker M.; Inanc M.; Elkiran E.; Gunaydin Y.; Menekse S.; Topcu T.; Urakci Z.; Tastekin D.; Bilici M.; Cihan S.; Geredeli C.; Sezer E.; Uncu D.; Arpaci E.; Ozturk B.; Bal O.; Uysal M.; Tanriverdi O.; Gumus M.; Oven Ustaalioglu B.; Suner A.; Cokmert S.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Aydin K.; Isikdogan A.
    Purpose: Almost half of all patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have distant metastases at presentation. One-third of patients with NSCLC will have brain metastases. Without effective treatment, the median survival is only 1 month. However, it is difficult to treat brain metastases with systemic chemotherapy since the agents have difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, it is important to estimate the patient's survival prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival in Turkish patients who received chemotherapy after cranial irradiation for NSCLC with brain metastases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 698 patients with brain metastases resulting from NSCLC. Ten potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). Results: Among the 10 variables for univariate analysis, six were identified to have prognostic significance; these included sex, smoking history, histology, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection. Multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model showed that a smoking history, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion: Smoking history, extracranial metastases, and neurosurgical resection were considered independent negative prognostic factors for OS. These findings may facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and can be used for selecting patients for more appropriate treatment options. © 2017 Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy and safety of folfiri plus aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-life data from Turkish oncology group
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022) Erol C.; Sendur M.A.N.; Bilgetekin I.; Garbioglu D.B.; Hamdard J.; Akbas S.; Hizal M.; Arslan C.; Sevinc A.; Kucukarda A.; Erdem D.; Kahraman S.; Cakir E.; Demirkiran A.; On S.; Dogan I.; Erdogan A.P.; Koca S.; Kubilay P.; Eren O.O.; Cilbir E.; Celik E.; Araz M.; Ozyukseler D.T.; Yildirim M.E.; Bahceci A.; Taskaynatan H.; Oyman A.; Deniz G.I.; Menekse S.; Kut E.; Gulmez A.; Sakin A.; Nayir E.; Acar R.; Sen E.; Inal A.; Turhal S.; Kaya A.O.; Paydas S.; Tastekin D.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Cincin I.; Bilici A.; Mandel N.M.; Dede D.S.; Akinci M.B.; Oksuzoglu B.; Uncu D.; Yalcin B.; Artac1 M.
    Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial. © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Treatment efficacy of ribociclib or palbociclib plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    (Newlands Press Ltd, 2023) Kahraman S.; Erul E.; Seyyar M.; Gumusay O.; Bayram E.; Demirel B.C.; Acar O.; Aksoy S.; Baytemur N.K.; Sahin E.; Cabuk D.; Basaran G.; Paydas S.; Yaren A.; Guven D.C.; Erdogan A.P.; Demirci U.; Yasar A.; Bayoglu İ.V.; Hizal M.; Gulbagci B.; Paksoy N.; Davarci S.E.; Yilmaz F.; Dogan O.; Orhan S.O.; Kayikcioglu E.; Aytac A.; Keskinkilic M.; Mocan E.E.; Unal O.U.; Aydin E.; Yucel H.; Isik D.; Eren O.; Uluc B.O.; Ozcelik M.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Aydiner A.; Demir H.; Oksuzoglu B.; Cilbir E.; Cubukcu E.; Cetin B.; Oktay E.; Erol C.; Okutur S.K.; Yildirim N.; Alkan A.; Selcukbiricik F.; Aksoy A.; Karakas Y.; Ozkanli G.; Duman B.B.; Aydin D.; Dulgar O.; Er M.M.; Teker F.; Yavuzsen T.; Aykan M.B.; Inal A.; Iriagac Y.; Kalkan N.O.; Keser M.; Sakalar T.; Menekse S.; Kut E.; Bilgin B.; Karaoglanoglu M.; Sunar V.; Ozdemir O.; Turhal N.S.; Karadurmus N.; Yalcin B.; Nahit Sendur M.A.
    Background: Ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib are currently approved CDK4/6 inhibitors along with aromatase inhibitors as the first-line standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The authors report retrospective real-life data for 600 patients with estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with ribociclib and palbociclib in combination with letrozole. Results & conclusion: The results demonstrated that the combination of palbociclib or ribociclib with letrozole has similar progression-free survival and overall survival benefit in real life for the patient group with similar clinical features. Specifically, endocrine sensitivity may be a factor to be considered in the treatment preference. © 2023 Future Medicine Ltd.