Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All Contents
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Hatipoglu, HU"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparing mesh and compressor nebulizers in pulmonary function test in pediatric asthma attacks: A double-blind randomized comparative clinical trial
    Okay, B; Hatipoglu, HU; Okay, ZU; Sahin, K; Yasar, A
    Objective: Asthma is a prevalent global health issue, especially affecting children in numerous countries. Our study aimed to determine the most effective nebulizer type by comparing the effects of mesh nebulizers (MNs) and compressor nebulizers (CNs) on spirometry tests in pediatric asthma attacks. Methods: The prospective, double-blind, randomized comparative study was conducted with patients aged 7-15 presenting with asthma attacks. The participating patients were divided into two groups by randomization: those using CNs and those using MNs. A pulmonary function test was performed before and after giving the patients three doses of salbutamol inhaler at 20-minute intervals, and changes in the test were recorded. Results: The increase in peripheral oxygen saturation was higher in the MN group, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.391). However, statistically significant differences were observed in the decrease in respiratory rate (RR;/min; p = 0.002) and the increase in heart rate (/min; p = 0.022). The respiratory function test indicated a higher change in forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow in the MN group than the CN group, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.258 and 0.256). However, statistically significant changes were observed in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of FVC (FEF25-75; p = 0.001 and 0.043). Conclusion: MNs show superior improvement in vital signs and pulmonary function, particularly in RR, FEV1, and FEF25-75. MNs may be preferred for more effective treatment despite heart rate elevation.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Epidemiological, Clinical, and Laboratory Features of Children With COVID-19 in Turkey
    Karbuz, A; Akkoc, G; Demirdag, TB; Ciftdogan, DY; Ozer, A; Cakir, D; Torun, SH; Kepenekli, E; Erat, T; Dalgic, N; Ilbay, S; Karaaslan, A; Erdeniz, EH; Aygun, FD; Bozdemir, SE; Hatipoglu, N; Emiroglu, M; Bal, ZS; Ciftci, E; Bayhan, GI; Aydin, ZGG; Demir, SO; Kilic, O; Hacimustafaoglu, M; Okur, DS; Sen, S; Yahsi, A; Akturk, H; Cetin, B; Sutcu, M; Kara, M; Uygun, H; Kara, TT; Korukluoglu, G; Akgun, O; èstundag, G; Mis, MD; Sali, E; Kaba, O; Yakut, N; Kilic, O; Kanik, MK; Cetin, C; Dursun, A; Cicek, M; Kockuzu, E; Sevketoglu, E; Alkan, G; Ozenen, GG; Ince, E; Baydar, Z; Ozkaya, AK; Ovali, HF; Tekeli, S; Celebi, S; Cubukcu, B; Bal, A; Khalilova, F; Kose, M; Hatipoglu, HU; Dalkiran, T; Turgut, M; Altas, AB; Duru, HNS; Aksay, A; Saglam, S; Yanartas, MS; Ergenc, Z; Akin, Y; Kar, YD; Sahin, S; Tuteroz, SK; Bilen, NM; Ozdemir, H; Senoglu, MC; Kucukalioglu, BP; Besli, GE; Kara, Y; Turan, C; Demirtas, BS; Celikyurt, A; Cosgun, Y; Elevli, M; Sahin, A; Oguz, SB; Somer, A; Karadag, B; Demirhan, R; Dagi, HT; Kurugol, Z; Taskin, EC; Sahiner, A; Yesil, E; Keles, YE; Sarikaya, R; Eralp, EE; Ozkinay, F; Konca, HK; Yilmaz, S; Gokdemir, Y; Arga, G; Ozen, S; Coksuer, F; Vatansever, G; Tezer, H; Kara, A
    Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted by pediatric infectious disease specialists from 32 different hospitals from all over Turkey by case record forms. Pediatric cases who were diagnosed as COVID-19 between March 16, 2020, and June 15, 2020 were included. Case characteristics including age, sex, dates of disease onset and diagnosis, family, and contact information were recorded. Clinical data, including the duration and severity of symptoms, were also collected. Laboratory parameters like biochemical tests and complete blood count, chest X-ray, and chest computed tomography (CT) were determined. Results: There were 1,156 confirmed pediatric COVID-19 cases. In total, male cases constituted 50.3% (n = 582) and females constituted 49.7% (n = 574). The median age of the confirmed cases was 10.75 years (4.5-14.6). Of the total cases, 90 were younger than 1 year of age (7.8%), 108 were 1-3 years of age (9.3%), 148 were 3-6 years of age (12.8%), 298 were 6-12 years of age (25.8%), 233 were 12-15 years of age (20.2%), and 268 cases were older than 15 years of age (23.2%). The most common symptom of the patients at the first visit was fever (50.4%) (n = 583) for a median of 2 days (IQR: 1-3 days). Fever was median at 38.4 degrees C (38.0-38.7 degrees C). The second most common symptom was cough (n = 543, 46.9%). The other common symptoms were sore throat (n = 143, 12.4%), myalgia (n = 141, 12.2%), dyspnea (n = 118, 10.2%), diarrhea (n = 112, 9.7%), stomachache (n = 71, 6.1%), and nasal discharge (n = 63, 5.4%). When patients were classified according to disease severity, 263 (22.7%) patients were asymptomatic, 668 (57.7%) patients had mild disease, 209 (18.1%) had moderate disease, and 16 (1.5%) cases had severe disease. One hundred and forty-nine (12.9%) cases had underlying diseases among the total cases; 56% of the patients who had severe disease had an underlying condition (p < 0.01). The need for hospitalization did not differ between patients who had an underlying condition and those who do not have (p = 0.38), but the need for intensive care was higher in patients who had an underlying condition (p < 0.01). Forty-seven (31.5%) of the cases having underlying conditions had asthma or lung disease (38 of them had asthma). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest pediatric data about confirmed COVID-19 cases. Children from all ages appear to be susceptible to COVID-19, and there is a significant difference in symptomatology and laboratory findings by means of age distribution.

Manisa Celal Bayar University copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback