Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All Contents
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Icelli, I"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Public attitudes to schizophrenia in rural Turkey
    Taskin, EO; Sen, FS; Aydemir, O; Demet, MM; Ozmen, E; Icelli, I
    Background The aim of this study was to determine the public's attitudes and their correlates towards patients with schizophrenia in rural areas. Methods The study was carried out in a village near Manisa City, Turkey. Two hundred and eight subjects completed the public survey form which consists of ten items screening demographic and health status and 32 items rating attitudes towards schizophrenia. Results Half of the subjects stated that persons with schizophrenia are aggressive and that they should not be free in the community. More than half of the subjects stated that they would be irritated about having a neighbour with schizophrenia (61.5%), that they would not rent their home to a person with schizophrenia (58.2%), that they do not want to work with a person with schizophrenia (61.1%), and that they would not get married to a person with schizophrenia (85.6%). Conclusions The public in rural areas sufficiently recognises schizophrenia but has a tendency to stigmatise schizophrenic patients. Their attitudes are generally negative and rejective. They do not want close contact with schizophrenic patients. Interpretation of schizophrenia as a mental illness leads to more negative attitudes and increases the social distance.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    ELDERLY ABUSE IN TURKEY
    Icelli, I
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Suicide and attempted suicide in the elderly. Should the physician give support to patient's wish to die?
    Icelli, I
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    QUALITY OF LIFE AND PSYCHIATRIC CONSULTATION IN ELDERLY
    Icelli, I
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    World psychiatric association section of old age psychiatry consensus statement on ethics and capacity in older people with mental disorders
    Katona, C; Chiu, E; Adelman, S; Baloyannis, S; Camus, V; Firmino, H; Gove, D; Graham, N; Ghebrehiwet, T; Icelli, I; Ihl, R; Kalasic, A; Leszek, L; Kim, S; Lima, CD; Peisah, C; Tataru, N; Warner, J
    The World Psychiatric Association (WPA) Section of Old Age Psychiatry, since 1997, has developed Consensus Statements relevant to the practice of Old Age Psychiatry. Since 2006 the Section has worked to develop a Consensus Statement on Ethics and Capacity in older people with mental disorders, which was completed in Prague, September 2008, prior to the World Congress in Psychiatry. This Consensus meets one of the goals of the WPA Action Plan 2008-2011, to promote the highest ethical standards in psychiatric practice and advocate the rights of persons with mental disorders in all regions of the world. This Consensus Statement offers to mental health clinicians caring for older people with mental disorders. caregivers, other health professionals and the general public the setting out of and discourse in ethical principles which can often be complex and challenging, supported by practical guidance in meeting such ethical needs and standards, and to encouraged good clinical practice. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    World Psychiatric Association Section of Old Age Psychiatry Consensus Statement on Ethics and Capacity in older people with mental disorders
    Katona, C; Chiu, E; Adelman, S; Baloyannis, S; Camus, V; Firmino, H; Gove, D; Graham, N; Ghebrehiwet, T; Icelli, I; Ihl, R; Kalasic, AM; Leszek, J; Kim, SYH; Lima, CAD; Peisah, C; Tataru, N; Warner, J
    Background: The World Psychiatric Association (WPA) Section of Old Age Psychiatry, since 1997, has developed Consensus Statements relevant to the practice of Old Age Psychiatry. Since 2006 the Section has worked to develop a Consensus Statement on Ethics and Capacity in older people with mental disorders. Method: A Consensus Conference was realized in Prague, September 2008. The meeting was organized by the WPA Section of Old Age Psychiatry, with the participation of International Council of Nurses, Alzheimer Europe and Alzheimer Disease International. Participants who are recognised for their expertise in this area came from 11 countries and include psychiatrists, a neurologist, a nurse and family caregiving representatives. Results: After two days of debate a draft was prepared and submitted to the organizations/associations represented at the meeting. When their respective comments were collected, a final text was prepared and published originally in English. This Portuguese version was prepared by two members of the meeting who came from Portuguese spoken countries. Discussion: This Consensus Statement offers to mental health clinicians caring for older people with mental disorders, caregivers, other health professionals and the general public the setting out of and discourse in ethical principles which can often be complex and challenging, supported by practical guidance in meeting such ethical needs and standards, and to encouraged good clinical practice.

Manisa Celal Bayar University copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback