Browsing by Author "Ilker S."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The effect of propolis extract in experimental chemical corneal injury
    (S. Karger AG, 2000) Öztürk F.; Kurt E.; Çerçi M.; Emiroǧlu L.; Inan U.; Türker M.; Ilker S.
    Purpose: To investigate the effect of propolis, a natural resin produced by honeybees, in the treatment of alkali-injured rabbit eyes. Method: A corneal alkali burn was induced by applying filter paper immersed in 1 N NaOH on the central axis of the right corneas of 24 rabbits for 30 s. The animals were divided into three treatment groups: group 1 (control) was given 0.3% tobramycin and phosphate-buffered solution; group 2 was treated with antibiotic coverage and topical 1% ethanolic extract of propolis; group 3 received antibiotic coverage and topical 1% dexamethasone. The dexamethasone-treated group was maintained as the positive control. Drugs were instilled 4 times a day for 7 days. The corneal inflammation was evaluated by calculating the average inflammatory index obtained from clinical observation of the ciliary hyperemia, central and peripheral corneal edema at 24 h, 48 h, on day 5 and day 7, before sacrificing the animals. Then, the corneas underwent routine histological examination. Results: The effects of dexamethasone and propolis on healing of injured corneas were similar (p > 0.05) and significantly better than controls at 24 h (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, respectively), and on day 7 (p < 0.05) with respect to the inflammatory index. On histological observation, inflammatory cell infiltration was lower as compared to control in both the dexamethasone and propolis groups (p < 0.001) and similar with each other (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our study shows that propolis has an anti-inflammatory effect comparable to dexamethasone in chemical corneal injury. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by contact and non-contact pachymetry devices
    (Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, 2021) Mayali H.; Altinisik M.; Diri I.; Ilker S.; Kurt E.; Kayikcioglu O.
    Aim and objective: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by handheld contact ultrasound pachymetry (HCUP) and non-contact pachymetry devices. Materials and methods: Ninety eyes of 90 patients (52 male and 38 female) were included in the study. Measurements from two non-contact devices, —specular microscopy (SM, Konan Medical, CA, USA) and Oculus Pentacam (Oculus Inc., Germany)—were compared against HCUP (Pachmate 2, DGH Technology, Inc, PA, USA). Ultrasound measurements were obtained 3 times by the same user and averaged. The differences were calculated by one-way ANOVA. Agreement between measurements were assessed by Bland–Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient tests. Coefficient of repeatability (%, CR) was defined as 1.96*standard deviations of the differences between pairs of measurements divided by the average of the means. Results: The mean age was 34.31 ± 14.39 (14–74) years, and the mean intraocular pressure was 16.48 ± 2.63 mm Hg (12–21). Mean CCT measured by HCUP, SM, and Pentacam was 557.76 ± 36.76 μm, 550.29 ± 43.74 μm, and 541.41 ± 35.7 μm, respectively (p < 0.05). In the Bland–Altman plot, 95% limit of agreements were 19.5 and 14.18 μm among HCUP measurements, 34.55 μm between HCUP and Pentacam, 41.49 μm between SM and Pentacam, and 46.98 μm between HCUP and SM. CR values (%) were 3.49, 2.54, 6.28, 7.68, and 8.47, respectively. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the mean CCT values of the measurement devices. Clinical significance: Contact and non-contact devices may not interchangeable in the clinical assessment of CCT. © Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2021 Open Access.