Browsing by Author "Kesebir S."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Quality of life in major depressive disorder: A cross-secti onal study
    (Turkish Association of Nervous and Mental Health, 2009) Aydemir Ö.; Ergün H.; Soygür H.; Kesebir S.; Tulunay C.
    Objective: To investigate quality of life and its association with depression in patients with major depressive disorder. Method: The study included 74 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) was used to assess the severity of depression; and the, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36) and EuroQol 5-D (EQ-5D) were used to measure quality of life. Results: In the assessment of quality of life, it was determined that Patients with major depressive disorder scored significantly lower on all domains of MOS SF-36 compared to Turkish normative data. The depressive disorder patients had lower EQ-5D health utility index scores, in comparison to Turkish normative data. There was a significant negative correlation between mean HAM-D score and all domains of MOS SF-36 and EQ-5D health utility index scores. When quality of life in depressive patients was compared according to episode type, patients with recurrent type major depressive disorder had lower quality of life in terms of physical functioning, general health perception, and physical component summary score than patients with single episode type major depressive disorder. Concusion: All domains of quality of life were lower in patients with major depressive disorder and quality of life decreased as severity of depression increased. Physical health perception was impaired to a greater degree in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder when compared with single episode depressive patients.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Validity and reliability of nine types temperament scale
    (2014) Yilmaz E.D.; GenÇer A.G.; Aydemir O.; Yilmaz A.; Kesebir S.; Ünal O.; Örek A.; Bilici M.
    The aim of this study is to develop a scale compatible with the Nine Types Temperament Model (NTTM), which did not have any prior measurement tools to scientifically prove its reliability and validity. NTTM is created by re-evaluating the Enneagram System-a system that defines nine personality types- used for analyzing and comprehending ego mechanisms. Nine Types Temperament Scale (NTTS) which is a self-rated instrument composed of 91 items with three-point Likert type was developed from this model and applied to 990 participants. Confirmatory factor analyses were carried out in order to evaluate whether the scale fits to the model related to the temperament model. In exploratory factor analyses of the scale eigen values of nine factors vary between 8.089 and 1.661, and represent 39.04% of the total variance. In confirmatory analyses of the scale CFI value is 0.88, GFI value is 0.84, IFI value is 0.88 and RMSEA value is 0.05. Test-retest reliability of the scale was evaluated with 46 participants. Cronbach alpha value of the whole scale is 0.75, while Cronbach alpha values for every temperament type were calculated as 0.77, 0.79, 0.68, 0.71, 0.80, 0.74, 0.71, 0.83 and 0.77 respectively. Concurrent validity was performed with Cloninger's TCI (Temperament and Character Inventory) and Akiskal's TEMPS-A (Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego Autoquestionnaire Version). The types of NTTM showed significant correlations with TCI and TEMPS-A. Results of the study support that NTTS is a reliable and valid scale.