Browsing by Author "Khan M.A."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Is Axial Spondyloarthritis More Common Than Rheumatoid Arthritis?
    (Springer, 2020) Akkoc N.; Khan M.A.
    Purpose of Review: To discuss the disease incidence and prevalence rates of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) relative to those of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recent Findings: According to the most recently published systematic reviews, pooled prevalence estimates for RA are 0.38% in North America, and 0.21 to 0.25% in European subregions, while that of AS is 0.20% in North America and 0.25% in Europe. The estimated prevalence of axSpA has been reported to be approximately twice as common as AS in a study from the USA. This finding has also been supported by studies from northern Norway, central Italy, western Turkey, northern and southern regions of China, and rural Taiwan. These data suggest that axSpA, that encompasses AS, may be more prevalent than RA, at least in some countries. Summary: In general, higher occurrences of RA relative to AS have been noted worldwide, both in terms of incidence and prevalence. But axSpA, that encompasses AS, may be more prevalent than RA, at least in some countries. There is a need for concurrently run studies in the same population for a reliable comparison to establish occurrence of RA, AS, and axSpA. It is hoped that the implementation of the ICD-11 codes for axSpA will be helpful in determining a more accurate estimate of its incidence and prevalence. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    JAK Inhibitors for Axial Spondyloarthritis: What does the Future Hold?
    (Springer, 2021) Akkoc N.; Khan M.A.
    Purpose of Review: To discuss the potential role of JAK inhibitors (JAKis) as a new therapeutic class for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, including ankylosing spondylitis [AS] and non-radiographic axSpA [nr-axSpA]). Recent Findings: A phase III randomized controlled trial of tofacitinib (a “pan JAKi”) in patients with active AS was found to be superior to placebo in achieving the ASAS20 primary endpoint at week 16 (56.4% and 29.4%, p < 0.0001, phase II trials of AS). Upadacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, has also been evaluated in a phase III trial for its efficacy and safety in AS. The primary endpoint, ASAS40 at week 16, was reached by 52% of the patients randomized to upadacitinib and 26% of the patients receiving placebo (p = 0·0003). All the important secondary endpoints also improved with both agents. No new changes in their safety profile were noted. However, the more frequent occurrence of cardiovascular and cancer adverse events associated with tofacitinib than with TNFi observed in the very recent post-marketing “ORAL surveillance” safety study, the results of which were released on January 27, 2021, may lead to safety concerns swirling around the whole class of JAKis. Summary: JAKis seem to be effective in treating signs and symptoms of AS but have not been studied in nr-axSpA. Both tofacitinib and upadacitinib have been pre-registered with the FDA for the treatment of AS. Upadacitinib has just recently received approval for this indication in the European Union. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.