Browsing by Author "Mocan, EE"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy (vol 23, 136, 2023)
    Karacin, C; Oksuzoglu, B; Demirci, A; Keskinkiliç, M; Baytemür, NK; Yilmaz, F; Selvi, O; Erdem, D; Avsar, E; Paksoy, N; Demir, N; Göksu, SS; Türker, S; Bayram, E; Çelebi, A; Yilmaz, H; Kuzu, ÖF; Kahraman, S; Gökmen, I; Sakin, A; Alkan, A; Nayir, E; Ugrakli, M; Acar, Ö; Ertürk, I; Demir, H; Aslan, F; Sönmez, Ö; Korkmaz, T; Celayir, ÖM; Karadag, I; Kayikçioglu, E; Sakalar, T; Öktem, IN; Eren, T; Erul, E; Mocan, EE; Kalkan, Z; Yildirim, N; Ergün, Y; Akagündüz, B; Karakaya, S; Kut, E; Teker, F; Demirel, BÇ; Karaboyun, K; Almuradova, E; Ünal, OÜ; Oyman, A; Isik, D; Okutur, K; Öztosun, B; Gülbagci, BB; Kalender, ME; Sahin, E; Seyyar, M; Özdemir, Ö; Selçukbiricik, F; Kanitez, M; Dede, I; Gümüs, M; Gökmen, E; Yaren, A; Menekse, S; Ebinç, S; Aksoy, S; Imamoglu, GI; Altinbas, M; Çetin, B; Uluç, BO; Er, Ö; Karadurmus, N; Erdogan, AP; Artaç, M; Tanriverdi, Ö; Çiçin, I; Sendur, MAN; Oktay, E; Bayoglu, IV; Paydas, S; Aydiner, A; Salim, DK; Geredeli, Ç; Yavuzsen, T; Dogan, M; Hacibekiroglu, I
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy
    Karacin, C; Oksuzoglu, B; Demirci, A; Keskinkiliç, M; Baytemür, NK; Yilmaz, F; Selvi, O; Erdem, D; Avsar, E; Paksoy, N; Demir, N; Göksu, SS; Türker, S; Bayram, E; Çelebi, A; Yilmaz, H; Kuzu, ÖF; Kahraman, S; Gökmen, I; Sakin, A; Alkan, A; Nayir, E; Ugrakli, M; Acar, Ö; Ertürk, I; Demir, H; Aslan, F; Sönmez, Ö; Korkmaz, T; Celayir, ÖM; Karadag, I; Kayikçioglu, E; Sakalar, T; Öktem, IN; Eren, T; Urul, E; Mocan, EE; Kalkan, Z; Yildirim, N; Ergün, Y; Akagündüz, B; Karakaya, S; Kut, E; Teker, F; Demirel, BÇ; Karaboyun, K; Almuradova, E; Ünal, OÜ; Oyman, A; Isik, D; Okutur, K; Öztosun, B; Gülbagci, BB; Kalender, ME; Sahin, E; Seyyar, M; Özdemir, Ö; Selçukbiricik, F; Kanitez, M; Dede, I; Gümüs, M; Gökmen, E; Yaren, A; Menekse, S; Ebinç, S; Aksoy, S; Imamoglu, GI; Altinbas, M; Çetin, B; Uluç, BO; Er, Ö; Karadurmus, N; Erdogan, AP; Artaç, M; Tanriverdi, Ö; Çiçin, I; Sendur, MAN; Oktay, E; Bayoglu, IV; Paydas, S; Aydiner, A; Salim, DK; Geredeli, Ç; Yavuzsen, T; Dogan, M; Hacibekiroglu, I
    Background There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and >= 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0-14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9-6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8-7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6-6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5-8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5-4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Effectiveness of Adjuvant PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Surgically Resected Stage III/IV Acral Melanoma
    Arak, H; Erkiliç, S; Yaslikaya, S; Mocan, EE; Aktas, G; Özdemir, M; Semiz, HS; Kiliçkap, S; Özalp, FR; Sever, ÖN; Akdag, G; Agaoglu, AB; Özçelik, M; Sari, M; Arcagök, M; Anik, H; Yayla, SB; Sever, N; Açar, FP; Bayrakçi, I; Turhal, S; Ayhan, M; Kus, T
    Our aim was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and compare the other adjuvant treatments in patients with surgically resected stage III or IV acral melanoma. This study is a multicenter, retrospective analysis. We included 114 patients with stage III or IV acral malignant melanoma who underwent surgery within the past 10 years. We analyzed the effect of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors on disease-free survival (DFS). The mean follow-up was 40 months, during which 69 (59.5%) patients experienced recurrence. Among the participants, 64 (56.1%) received systemic adjuvant therapy. Specifically, 48.4% received anti-PD-1 therapy, 29.7% received interferon, 14.1% received tezozolomide, and 7.8% received B-Raf proto-oncogene/mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. Patients who received adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 24 (10.9-37.2) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 15 (9.8-20.2) months. Multivariate analysis for DFS revealed that the receipt of adjuvant therapy and lymph node metastasis stage were independent significant parameters (P = 0.021, P = 0.018, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed for DFS between programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor treatment and other adjuvant treatments. Regarding overall survival (OS), patients who received adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 71 (30.4-111.7) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 38 (16.7-59.3; P = 0.023) months. In addition, there were no significant differences in OS observed between various adjuvant treatment agents (P = 0.122). In our study, we have shown that adjuvant therapy had a positive effect on both DFS and OS in patients with stages III-IV acral melanoma who underwent curative intent surgery. Notably, we found no significant differences between anti-PD-1 therapy and other adjuvant therapies.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors and parameters affecting survival in elderly patients in age-subgroups: Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) retrospective study
    Kahraman, S; Hizal, M; Demirel, BC; Guven, DC; Gumusay, O; Uluc, BO; Bayram, E; Gulbagci, B; Yasar, A; Davarci, SE; Mocan, EE; Acar, O; Isik, D; Aydin, E; Karakas, Y; Ozcelik, M; Keser, M; Okutur, SK; Eren, O; Menekse, S; Aydin, D; Yilmaz, F; Dogan, O; Ozkanli, G; Yucel, H; Sunar, V; Aykan, MB; Ozdemir, O; Duman, BB; Keskinkilic, M; Sakalar, T; Inal, A; Karaoglanoglu, M; Aksoy, A; Er, MM; Turhal, NS; Kalkan, NO; Sendur, MAN
    Highly selective inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6is) have emerged as a standart of care for first- and second-line therapies in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. It has been reported that combination therapy is more effective than ET alone and is safe in elderly patients as well as young patients. Nevertheless, elderly and very old patients with HR+/HER2-MBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) combinations are relatively underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. To contribute to the literature, we investigated the real-world efficacy, factors associated with survival and the rates of adverse events (AEs) of the treatment with palbociclib or ribociclib plus ET in the HR+/HER2- MBC patient cohort over the age of 65 for age subgroups. In this retrospective study, 348 patients were divided into subgroups: 65-69 years old, 70-79 years old and 80 years and older. Median PFS (mPFS) for whole group was 18.3 (95% CI,14.3-22.3) months. There was no significant difference in mPFS between age groups (p = 0.75). The estimated median OS (mOS) was 39.5 (95% CI, 24.9-54.1) months and there was no significant difference between age groups (p = 0.15). There was a meaningfull numerical difference that did not reach statistical significance in patients who received CDK4/6i treatment as the first line for MBC. Grade 3-4 AEs were reported in 42.7% for the entire group, and neutropenia was the most common (37.3%). It can be concluded that combination therapy with palbociclib or ribociclib with an ET partner has similar efficacy and is safe among subgroups of older patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2-MBC.