Browsing by Author "Oğuzülgen K."
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Asthma-KOAH overlap syndrome; [Astım-KOAH overlap sendromu](Ankara University, 2015) Şen E.; Oğuzülgen K.; Bavbek S.; Günen H.; Kiyan E.; Türktaş H.; Yorgancioğlu A.; Polatli M.; Yildiz F.; Çelik G.; Demir T.; Gemicioğlu B.; Mungan D.; Saryal S.; Sayiner A.; Yildirim N.Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common lung diseases characterized by chronic airway inflammation and airway obstruction. Among patient with COPD and asthma; there is a group of patients with an overlap between clinical, functional characteristics and airway inflammation patterns, named “Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome” (ACOS). ACOS is a syndrome characterized by reversible but persistant airflow limitation (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 70%) which has some features of both asthma and COPD. ACOS should be suspected in a patient > 40 years, with smoking history, previous asthma diagnosis or history of childhood asthma who has persistant airflow limitation and reversible ariway obstruction (defined by an increase of > %12 of FEV1 pred or increase of FEV1 > 200 mL after inhalation of 400 mcg salbutamol or 1000 mcg terbutaline). The prevalence for ACOS has been reported 11-55% in different case series to date and increases by age and is more frequent in females in different age groups. Patients with ACOS are younger than COPD patients and older than asthma patients. Frequent and severe exacerbations and related hospitalization and emergency room visits are common in ACOS and this causes an impaired quality of life. Current recommendations of guidelines for pharmacologic treatment of ACOS have been composed of a combination with optimal COPD and asthma treatment. Future therapeutic approaches should be based on endotypes. Clinical phenotype and underlying endotype driven clinical studies may be the base of ACOS guidelines. © 2015, Ankara University. All rights reserved.Item Koah ve astımda atak; [KOAH ve astımda atak](Ankara University, 2015) Yildirim N.; Demir T.; Gemicioğlu B.; Kiyan E.; Oğuzülgen K.; Polatli M.; Saryal S.; Sayiner A.; Yorgancioğlu A.; Bavbek S.; Çelik G.E.; Günen H.; Mungan D.; Şen E.; Türktaş H.; Yildiz F.Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are airway diseases with acute exacerbations. Natural course of both disease are affected by exacerbations. COPD exacerbations may be caused by infections and other causes; indoor and outdoor pollution, cardiovascular diseases, asthma-COPD overlap syndrome, COPD- obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, pulmonary embolism, gastro-oesophageal reflux, anxiety-depression, pulmonary hypertension. Exposure to triggering factors, viral infections, treatment insufficiency may cause asthma exacerbations. Smoking cessations, prevention of infections, long-acting anticholinergics, long-acting β2 agonists, inhaled corticosteroids, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, mucolytics, prophilactic antibiotics can be effective on the prevention of COPD exacerbations. Asthma exacerbations may be decreased by the avoidance of allergens, viral infections, occupational exposures, airpollution, treatment of comorbid diseases. Effective treatment of asthma is required to prevent asthma exacerbations. Inhaled steroids and combined treatments are the most effective preventive therapy for exacerbations. Patient education and cooperation is an element of the preventive measures for asthma attacks. Compliance to therapy, inhalation techniques, written asthma plans are required. The essential of COPD and asthma exacerbation treatment is bronchodilator therapy. Steroids are also implemented to the therapy, targeting the inflammation. Specific treatments of the cause (infection, airpollution, pulmonary embolism etc.) should be administered. © 2015, Ankara University. All rights reserved.Item Short-acting β2-agonist prescription patterns in patients with asthma in Turkey: results from SABINA III(BioMed Central Ltd, 2022) Yorgancıoğlu A.; Aksu K.; Naycı S.A.; Ediger D.; Mungan D.; Gül U.; Beekman M.J.H.I.; Kızılırmak D.; Altıntaş N.; Bulut İ.; Çağatay T.; Gemicioğlu B.; İnce Ö.; Oğuzülgen K.; Kalpaklıoğlu F.; Baççıoğlu A.; Aksu F.; Altuntaş M.; Erkekol F.Ö.; Karakaya G.; Kalyoncu A.F.; Damadoğlu E.; Hanta İ.; Altunok E.; Özer A.; Yuluğ D.P.; Gülbaş G.; Süerdem M.; Yormaz B.; Ceylan E.; Erge D.; Çilli A.; Doğan B.C.; Erel F.; Sevinç C.; Anar C.; Pekbak G.; Erbay M.Background: Over-reliance on short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) is associated with poor asthma outcomes. However, the extent of SABA use in Turkey is unclear owing to a lack of comprehensive healthcare databases. Here, we describe the demographics, disease characteristics and treatment patterns from the Turkish cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥ 12 years with asthma from 24 centres across Turkey. Data on sociodemographics, disease characteristics and asthma treatments were collected using electronic case report forms. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA]) and practice type (primary/specialist care). The primary objective was to describe SABA prescription patterns in the 12 months prior to the study visit. Results: Overall, 579 patients were included (mean age [standard deviation; SD]: 47.4 [16.1] years; 74.3% female), all of whom were treated by specialists. Most patients had moderate-to-severe asthma (82.7%, GINA steps 3–5), were overweight or obese (70.5%), had high school or university/post-graduate education (51.8%) and reported fully reimbursed healthcare (97.1%). The mean (SD) asthma duration was 12.0 (9.9) years. Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 56.3% of patients, and 46.5% experienced ≥ 1 severe exacerbation in the preceding 12 months. Overall, 23.9% of patients were prescribed ≥ 3 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months (considered over-prescription); 42.9% received no SABA prescriptions. As few patients had mild asthma, only 5.7% were prescribed SABA monotherapy. Therefore, most patients (61.5%) were prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy, with 42.8% receiving ≥ 3 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ICS + a long-acting β-agonist fixed-dose combination and oral corticosteroids were prescribed to 14.5%, 88.3% and 28.5% of all patients, respectively. Additionally, 10.2% of patients purchased SABA over the counter, of whom 27.1% purchased ≥ 3 canisters in the preceding 12 months. Conclusions: Despite all patients being treated by specialists and most receiving fully reimbursed healthcare, nearly a quarter of patients received prescriptions for ≥ 3 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months. This highlights a public health concern and emphasizes the need to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based recommendations. © 2022, The Author(s).Item Clinical Course of Coronavirus disease 2019 C-19 in Patients with Bronchiectasis(AVES, 2024) Edis E.Ç.; Çilli A.; Kızılırmak D.; Coşkun A.Ş.; Sayıner A.; Çiçek S.; Gülmez İ.; Ağca M.Ç.; Çağlayan B.; Özçelik N.; Köktürk N.; Ocaklı B.; Uçan E.S.; Günlüoğlu G.; Niksarlıoğlu Y.; Zamani A.; Berk S.; Barış S.A.; Başyiğit İ.; Gülhan P.Y.; Kabak M.; Çolak M.; Toprak O.B.; Berk H.; Oğuzülgen K.; Demirdöğen E.; Eyüboğlu F.Ö.; Havlucu Y.; Babayiğit C.OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the whole world and caused the death of more than 6 million people. The disease has been observed to have a more severe course in patients with chronic lung diseases. There are limited data regarding COVID-19 in patients with bronchiectasis. The aim of this article is to investigate the course of COVID-19 and factors affecting the clinical outcome in patients with bronchiectasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was conducted using the Turkish Adult Bronchiectasis Database (TEBVEB) to which 25 centers in Türkiye contributed between March 2019 and January 2022. The database consisted of 1035 patients, and COVID-19-related data were recorded for 606 patients. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen (19.6%) of the bronchiectasis patients (64 female, mean age 57.3 ± 13.9) had COVID-19. Patients with bronchiectasis who developed COVID-19 more frequently had other comorbidities (P = .034). They also more frequently had cystic bron-chiectasis (P = .009) and their Bronchiectasis Severity Index was significantly higher (P = .019). Eighty-two (68.9%) of the patients who had COVID-19 were followed up in the outpatient clinic, 27 (22.7%) in the inpatient ward and 10 (8.4%) patients in the intensive care unit. There tended to be a higher percentage of males among patients admitted to the hospital (P = .073); similarly, the mean age of the patients admitted to the hospital was also higher (60.8 vs 55.8 years for the outpatients), but these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = .071). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study showed that severe bronchiectasis, presence of cystic bronchiectasis and worse Bronchiectasis Severity Index are associated with the development of COVID-19, but not with the severity of infection. © 2024, AVES. All rights reserved.Item Economic burden of short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) overuse among asthma patients in Türkiye: a cost analysis with respect to the updated GINA treatment recommendations(BioMed Central Ltd, 2024) Yorgancıoğlu A.; Aksu K.; Cura C.; Yaman Y.; Dinç M.; Malhan S.; Erbay M.; Pekbak G.; Ediger D.; Anar C.; Sevinç C.; Erel F.; Doğan B.C.; Çilli A.; Erge D.; Ceylan E.; Yormaz B.; Süerdem M.; Gülbaş G.; Yuluğ D.P.; Naycı S.A.; Özer A.; Altunok E.; Hanta İ.; Damadoğlu E.; Kalyoncu A.F.; Karakaya G.; Erkekol F.Ö.; Altuntaş M.; Aksu F.; Baççıoğlu A.; Kalpaklıoğlu F.; Mungan D.; Oğuzülgen K.; İnce Ö.; Gemicioğlu B.; Çağatay T.; Bulut İ.; Altıntaş N.; Kızılırmak D.Background: This cost of illness study aimed to determine economic burden of short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse in Türkiye from payer perspective with respect to the updated GINA 2022 treatment recommendations. Methods: A total of 3,034,879 asthma patients comprised the study population, via estimations extrapolated from the Türkiye arm of the global SABINA III study. The economic burden (costs related to the drug use and severe exacerbations) was compared in subgroups of overall (≥ 0 canisters/year) vs. GINA-recommended (0–2 canisters/year, hypothetical population) SABA use and in subgroups of appropriate use (0–2 canisters/year, real population) vs. overuse (≥ 3 canisters/year) of SABA with extrapolation of SABINA Türkiye data to the Türkiye asthma population. Results: Recommended SABA use was predicted to prevent 127,505 of 157,512 severe exacerbations per year in mild asthma patients and 2,668,916 of 3,262,800 severe exacerbations per year in moderate-severe asthma patients. Annual cost burden of not applying recommended SABA use (overall [≥ 0 canisters/year] vs. GINA-recommended [0–2 canisters/year] SABA use) in mild asthma and moderate-severe asthma patients was calculated to be €20.43 million and €427.65 million in terms of severe exacerbations, and to be €829,352 and €7.20 million in terms of drug costs, respectively. The total annual economic burden arising from not applying recommended SABA use was estimated to be €456.11 million. Appropriate use (0–2 canisters/year) vs. overuse (≥ 3 canisters/year) of SABA was associated with decreased frequency of severe exacerbations per year in mild asthma (from 129,878 to 27,634) and moderate-severe asthma (from 2,834,611 to 428,189) patients. SABA overuse in mild and moderate-severe asthma patients was estimated to yield an additional annual cost of €16.38 million and €385.59 million, respectively in terms of severe exacerbations, and a total €11.30 million additional drug cost. The overall annual economic burden arising from SABA overuse was estimated to be €413.27 million. Conclusions: The estimated annual total economic burden arising from not applying recommended SABA use (€456.11 million) and SABA overuse (€413.27 million) with respect to the updated GINA 2022 treatment recommendations indicates the substantial cost burden of SABA overuse to the Turkish National Health System, corresponding up to 26% of the total direct cost of asthma reported in our country. © The Author(s) 2024.