Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All Contents
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Ozdemir, IH"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Two uncommon complications of COVID-19 in same patient: MINOCA and pneumothorax
    Gunduz, R; Yildiz, BS; Ozdemir, IH; Ozen, MB; Erbuyun, SC
    COVID-19 has several clinical manifestations in the respiratory system and the cardiovascular system. Pneu-mothorax and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are two different cli-nical complications in COVID-19. However, pneumothorax and MINOCA have not been described yet in the same patient until now.A COVID-19 patient was admitted due to respiratory distress. He had pneumothorax and MINOCA.We re-port how we proceeded with diagnosis and treatment of pneumothorax and MINOCA. Respiratory and cardiovascular system manifestations of COVID-19 have made numerous clinical appearan-ces. MINOCA and pneumothorax are rare clinical appearances, but they can be seen in COVID-19 as shown in our case.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Clinical outcomes of comparison between type-III cap and non-cap acute coronary syndrome patients in 3 year follow up
    Yildiz, B; Gunduz, R; Ozgur, S; Cizgici, AY; Ozdemir, IH
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Frontal QRS/T angle can predict mortality in COVID-19 patients
    Gunduz, R; Yildiz, BS; Ozgur, S; Ozen, MB; Bakir, EO; Ozdemir, IH; Cetin, N; Usalp, S; Duman, S
    Aims: The frontal QRS-T (fQRS) angle has been investigated in the general population, including healthy people and patients with heart failure. The fQRS angle can predict mortality due to myocarditis, ischaemic and nonischaemic cardiomyopathies, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and chronic heart failure in the general population. Moreover, no studies to date have investigated fQRS angle in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Thus, the purpose of this retrospective multicentre study was to evaluate the fQRS angle of COVID-19 patients to predict in-hospital mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation.Methods and results: An electrocardiogram was performed for 327 COVID-19 patients during admission, and the fQRS angle was calculated. Mechanical ventilation was needed in 119 patients; of them, 110 died in the hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to an fQRs angle >90 degrees versus an fQRS angle <_90 degrees. The percentages of mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation according to fQRS angle were 67.8% and 66.1%, respectively, in the fQRs >90 degrees group and 26.1% and 29.9% in the fQRS <_90 degrees group. Heart rate, oxygen saturation, fQRS angle, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and C-reactive protein level were predictors of mortality on the multivariable analysis. The mortality risk increased 2.9-fold on the univariate analysis and 1.6-fold on the multivariate analysis for the fQRS >90 degrees patient group versus the fQRS <_90 degrees group.Conclusion: In conclusion, a wide fQRS angle >90 degrees was a predictor of in-hospital mortality and associated with the need for mechanical ventilation among COVID-19 patients.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Clinical Outcomes of Comparison Between Type III Coronary Artery Perforation (CAP) and non-CAP Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients During 3-Year Follow-up
    Yildiz, BS; Gunduz, R; Ozgur, S; Cizgici, AY; Ozdemir, IH
    Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a potentially fatal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to investigate in-hospital, 1-year, and 3-year clinical outcomes of type III CAP during PCI in patients with ACS. The study retrospectively evaluated 118 patients with CAP and 43,226 case-control patients. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, management, and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively at 1-year and 3-year follow-ups. The mean age of the patients was 66.5 +/- 11.9 years (61.8% males). There was no significant difference in hospital mortality between the type III CAP and non-CAP groups. The all-cause mortality was 33.3% in the CAP group vs 1.8% in the non-CAP group at 1 year, and 28.3% in CAP group vs 6.9% in non-CAP group at 3 years (p < .001 for both comparisons). The procedural, clinical, and 1 and 3-year outcomes of type III CAP showed a relatively high risk of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, cerebrovascular event, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding at the 1 and 3-year follow-ups. In addition, non-CAP ACS patients had better survival (log-rank: p <.001, 34.29 months 95% Confidence Interval [33.58-35.00]) than type III CAP ACS patients (29.53 months 95% Confidence Interval [27.28-31.78]) at the 3-year follow-up visit.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Fragmented QRS is a marker of mortality in patients with severe COVID-19: A retrospective observational study
    Ozdemir, IH; Özlek, B; Özen, MB; Gündüz, R; Çetin, N; Özlek, E; Yildiz, BS; Tikiz, H
    Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of fragmented QRS (f-QRS) with in-hospital death in patients with severe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: This was a retrospective and observational study. A total of 201 consecutive patients with severe COVID-19 were enrolled. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, medications, electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patients with and without f-QRS were compared, and predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Results: A total of 135 patients without f-QRS (mean age of 64 years, 43% women) and 66 patients with f-QRS (mean age of 66 years, 39% women) were included. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, troponin I, ferritin levels, and CRP to albumin ratio were significantly higher in patients with f-QRS. The need for invasive mechanical ventilation (63.6% vs. 41.5%, p=0.003) and all-cause in-hospital mortality [54.5% vs. 28.9%, log rank p=0.001, relative risk 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-4.78] were significantly higher in patients with f-QRS. A number value of f-QRS leads >= 2 yields sensitivity and specificity (85.3% and 86.7%, respectively) for predicting in-hospital all-cause mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that f-QRS (odds ratio: 1.041, 95% Cl: 1.021-1.192, p=0.040) were independently associated with in-hospital death. Conclusion: This study revealed that the presence of f-QRS in ECG is associated with higher in-hospital all-cause mortality in patients with severe COVID-19. f-QRS is an easily applicable simple indicator to predict the risk of death in these patients.

Manisa Celal Bayar University copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback