Browsing by Author "Ozmen, I"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Electronic Smoking In Parents In Pregnancy; A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
    Yildirim, EÖ; Duru, S; Sevim, T; Topcu, F; Gemicioglu, B; Ozmen, I; Ocakli, B; Tuncay, E; Altinoz, H; Apak, YK; Varol, Y; Polat, G; Ozkan, S; Dursunoglu, N; Sakarya, D; Gulhan, PY; Diken, OE; Cetinkaya, PD; Yorgancioglu, A; Selcuk, NT; Yildiz, F; Atacag, T; Niksarlioglu, Y; Uzaslan, E; Kokturk, N
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Determination of Attitudes of Turkish Thoracic Society Members on Exposure to Sexist Approach and Sexism in Business Life
    Ocakli, B; Yorgancioglu, A; Topcu, F; Köktürk, N; Altinöz, H; Yasin, Y; Kuzuca, IG; Duru, S; Yildirim, EO; Sevim, T; Tekgul, S; Tuncay, EA; Gungor, S; Goktas, B; Senol, YY; Ozturk, CA; Ozmen, I; Tastan, CP; Dulger, SU; Uzaslan, E; Erboy, F; Aksoy, E; Gulhan, PY; Kocabas, A; Gemicioglu, B; Topcu, S; Altinisik, G; Celik, P
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Attitudes toward and exposure to gender discrimination in work life by pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons: a questionnaire-based survey among Turkish thoracic society members
    Ocakli, B; Yorgancioglu, A; Gungor, S; Topcu, F; Senol, YY; Goktas, B; Kokturk, N; Tuncay, E; Gundogus, B; Altinoz, H; Yasin, Y; Ozmen, I; Duru, S; Yildirim, EO; Sevim, T; Ozturk, CA; Uzaslan, E
    Background: This study aimed to evaluate attitudes toward and exposure to gender discrimination in work life by chest diseases specialists and thoracic surgeons. Methods: A total of 275 members of Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS) were included on a voluntary basis in this online cross-sectional questionnaire-survey using an internal member-only social media platform of TTS. The questionnaire form elicited items on sociodemographic characteristics, occupational characteristics and gender discrimination in work life (general opinions, attitudes and exposure). Results: Female doctors (vs. males) were less likely to be a thoracic surgeon (13.8% vs. 34.5%, p < 0.05) and a professor of thoracic surgery (0.0% vs. 26.7% vs. p < 0.05), and more likely to consider housework as a considerable burden (89.8 vs. 73.6%, p = 0.02) and the significant role of discriminatory, negative and dissuasive attitudes of male physicians in their career choice (67.6 vs. 35.6%, p = 0.039). Male doctors were more likely to considered that men are more successful in specialties that require active physical strength (65.5 vs. 27.7%, p = 0.005) and those with very long working hours and heavy shifts (57.5 vs. 39.4%, p = 0.001). Female thoracic surgeons were more likely than males to consider that specialties with very long working hours and heavy shifts are more suitable for men (26.9 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.027) and men are given priority in academic career promotion (64.0 vs. 13.3%, p < 0.001). Younger (vs. older) females reported higher rate of exposure to gender discrimination (p = 0.041) and considerable impact of social roles on the specialty (p = 0.007), while female doctors working as a resident (33.8%) and a specialist (50.05%) indicated higher rate of exposure to gender discrimination during their career (p = 0.024). Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings revealed that exposure to gender discrimination in work life was more commonly expressed by female members of TTS, particularly in terms of burden of social roles, career advancement options and leadership positions, along with significant role of discriminatory, negative and dissuasive attitudes of male physicians in their career choice. Accordingly, women remain underrepresented in thoracic surgery, particularly in the academic rank of full professor and in leadership positions with inability to promote after a definite step in their careers.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    What should be the appropriate minimal duration for patient examination and evaluation in pulmonary outpatient clinics?
    Musellim, B; Borekci, S; Uzan, G; Sak, ZHA; Ozdemir, SK; Altinisik, G; Altunbey, SA; Sen, N; Kilinc, O; Yorgancioglu, A; Yilmaz, N; Ulasli, SS; Salepci, B; Ocakli, B; Sokullu, ZGE; Uzun, O; Kurtulus, S; Uslu, S; Saritas, E; Genc, S; Annakkaya, AN; Aydin, O; Bilgin, C; Turk, M; Ozmen, I; Tasbakan, MS; Halis, AN; Bahcecioglu, SN; Dabak, G; Isik, SR; Ozturk, AB; Akgun, M; Pihtili, A; Ozkan, G; Balbay, EG; Okumus, G; Onen, ZP; Yasayancan, N; Uysal, FE; Hanta, I; Kaya, Z; Turker, H; Berkesoglu, C; Celik, P; Cetinkaya, PD; Gundogus, B; Ongen, G; Tuncay, E; Erboy, F
    INTRODUCTION: Patient examinations performed in a limited time period may lead to impairment in patient and physician relationship, defective and erroneous diagnosis, inappropriate prescriptions, less common use of preventive medicine practices, poor patient satisfaction, and increased violent acts against health-care staff. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the appropriate minimal duration of patient examination in the pulmonary practice. METHODS: A total of 49 researchers from ten different study groups of the Turkish Thoracic Society participated in the study. The researchers were asked to examine patients in an almost ideal manner, without time constraint under available conditions. RESULTS: A total of 1680 patient examinations were reviewed. The mean duration of patient examination in ideal conditions was determined to be 20.4 +/- 9.6 min. Among all steps of patient examination, the longest time was spent for taking medical history. The total time spent for patient examination was statistically significantly longer in the university hospitals than in the governmental hospitals and training and research hospitals (P < 0.001). Among different patient categories, the patients with a chronic disorder presenting for the first time and were referred from primary or secondary to tertiary care for further evaluation have required the longest time for patient examination. CONCLUSION: According to our study, the appropriate minimal duration for patient examination is 20 min. It has been observed that in university hospitals and in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases, this duration has been increased to above 25 min. The durations in clinical practice should be planned accordingly.