Browsing by Author "Sahin I."
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Nesfatin-1 and ghrelin levels in serum and saliva of epileptic patients: Hormonal changes can have a major effect on seizure disorders(2009) Aydin S.; Dag E.; Ozkan Y.; Erman F.; Dagli A.F.; Kilic N.; Sahin I.; Karatas F.; Yoldas T.; Barim A.O.; Kendir Y.Nesfatin-1 and ghrelin are the two recently discovered peptide hormones involved in the control of appetite. Besides its main appetite-control function, ghrelin also has anticonvulsant effects, while nesfatin-1 causes depolarization in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). The aims of this study, therefore, were to investigate: (i) whether there are differences in the concentrations of nesfatin-1 and ghrelin in saliva and serum samples between eplilepsy patients and normal controls and (ii) whether salivary glands produce nesfatin-1. The study included a total of 73 subjects: 8 patients who were newly diagnosed with primary generalized seizures and had recently started antiepileptic drug therapy; 21 who had primary generalized seizures and were continuing with established antiepileptic drug therapy; 24 who had partial seizures (simple: n = 12 or complex: n = 12) and were continuing with established antiepileptic drug therapy; and 20 controls. Salivary gland tissue samples were analyzed for nesfatin-1 expression by immunochemistry and ELISA. Saliva and serum ghrelin levels were measured by ELISA and RIA, and nesfatin-1 levels by ELISA. Nesfatin-1 immunoreactivity was detected in the striated and interlobular parts of the salivary glands and the ducts. The nesfatin-1 level in the brain was around 12 times higher than in the salivary gland. Before antiepileptic treatment, both saliva and serum nesfatin-1 levels were around 160-fold higher in patients who are newly diagnosed with primary generalized epilepsy (PGE) than in controls; these levels decreased with treatment but remained about 10 times higher than the control values. Saliva and serum nesfatin-1 levels from patients with PGE and partial epilepsies who were continuing antiepileptic drugs were also 10-fold higher than control values. Serum and saliva ghrelin levels were significantly (twofold) lower in epileptic patients before treatment than in controls; they recovered somewhat with treatment but remained below the control values. These results suggest that the low ghrelin and especially the dramatically elevated nesfatin-1 levels might contribute to the pathophyisology of epilepsy. Therefore, serum and saliva ghrelin and especially the remarkably increased nesfatin-1 might be candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis of epilepsy and for monitoring the response to anti-epileptic treatment. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009.Item Impact of telephonic interviews on persistence and daily adherence to insulin treatment in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients: Dropout study(Dove Medical Press Ltd., 2016) Yavuz D.G.; Bilen H.; Sancak S.; Garip T.; Hekimsoy Z.; Sahin I.; Yilmaz M.; Aydin H.; Atmaca A.; Sert M.; Karakaya P.; Arpaci D.; Oguz A.; Guvener N.Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of sequential telephonic interviews on treatment persistence and daily adherence to insulin injections among insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients initiated on different insulin regimens in a 3-month period. Methods: A total of 1,456 insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (mean [standard deviation, SD] age: 56.0 [12.0] years, 49.1% were females) initiated on insulin therapy and consecutively randomized to sequential (n=733) and single (n=723) telephonic interview groups were included. Data on insulin treatment and self-reported blood glucose values were obtained via telephone interview. Logistic regression analysis was performed for factors predicting increased likelihood of persistence and skipping an injection. Results: Overall, 76.8% patients (83.2% in sequential vs 70.3% in single interview group, (P<0.001) remained on insulin treatment at the third month. Significantly higher rate for skipping doses was noted in basal bolus than in other regimens (27.0% vs 15.0% for premixed and 15.8% basal insulin, respectively, P<0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed sequential telephonic interview (odds ratio [OR], 1.531 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.093-2.143 P=0.013), higher hemoglobin A1c levels (OR, 1.090 95% CI, 0.999-1.189 P=0.049), and less negative appraisal of insulin therapy as significant predictors of higher persistence. Basal bolus regimen (OR, 1.583 95% CI, 1.011-2.479 P=0.045) and higher hemoglobin A1c levels (OR, 1.114 95% CI, 1.028-1.207 P=0.008) were the significant predictors of increased likelihood of skipping an injection. Conclusion: Our findings revealed positive influence of sequential telephonic interview, although including no intervention in treatment, on achieving better treatment persistence in type 2 diabetes patients initiating insulin. © 2016 Yavuz et al.Item Turkish nationwide survEy of glycemic and other Metabolic parameters of patients with Diabetes mellitus (TEMD study)(Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 2018) Sonmez A.; Haymana C.; Bayram F.; Salman S.; Dizdar O.S.; Gurkan E.; Kargili Carlıoglu A.; Barcin C.; Sabuncu T.; Satman I.; Guldiken S.; Ayturk S.; Yilmaz M.; Asik M.; Dinccag N.; Cakmak R.; Turker F.; Idiz C.; Hacisahinogullari H.; Bagdemir E.; Yildiz B.; Yumuk V.D.; Haliloglu O.; Sancak S.; Ozsari L.; Cagiltay E.; Deyneli O.; Imre E.; Gonen S.; Boysan S.N.; Altuntas Y.; Ozturk F.Y.; Mert M.; Piskinpasa H.; Aydin H.; Imamoglu S.; Ersoy C.; Gul O.O.; Kucuksarac Kiyici S.; Cetinarslan B.; Selek A.; Dogru T.; Kirik A.; Kebapci N.; Efe B.; Kaya A.; Cordan I.; Baldane S.; Kirac C.O.; Demirci I.; Capa Z.; Cesur M.; Yetkin I.; Corapcioglu D.; Canlar S.; Bulent Yildiz O.; Sendur S.N.; Cakir B.; Ozdemir D.; Corakci A.; Kutlu M.; Bascil Tutuncu N.; Bozkus Y.; Cakal E.; Demirbas B.; Ertek S.; Altay M.; Dagdeviren M.; Abedi A.H.; Cetinkalp S.; Ozisik H.; Oruk G.G.; Yener S.; Saydam B.O.; Guney E.; Unubol M.; Yaylali G.F.; Topsakal S.; Hekimsoy Z.; Akbaba G.; Aslan I.; Balci M.K.; Dalkiran S.; Akbay E.; Gul K.; Agbaht K.; Yilmaz M.O.; Bozkirli E.; Tetiker B.T.; Cetinkaya Altuntas S.; Atmaca A.; Durmuş E.T.; Mete T.; Kutluturk F.; Kucukler F.K.; Dikbas O.; Akin S.; Nuhoglu I.; Ersoz H.O.; Bayraktaroglu T.; Sisman P.; Sahin I.; Cetin S.; Capoglu I.; Akbas E.M.; Ucler R.; Eren M.A.; Tuzcu A.K.; Pekkolay Z.; Ozkaya M.; Araz M.Aims: Turkey has the highest prevalence of diabetes in Europe. It is therefore essential to know the overall cardiovascular risk and reveal the predictors of metabolic control in Turkish adults with diabetes mellitus. Methods: A nationwide, multicenter survey consecutively enrolled patients who were under follow up for at least a year. Optimal control was defined as HbA1c < 7%, home arterial blood pressure (ABP) < 135/85 mmHg, or LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. Achieving all parameters indicated triple metabolic control. Results: HbA1c levels of patients (n = 5211) were 8.6 ± 1.9% (71 ± 22 mmol/mol) and 7.7 ± 1.7% (61 ± 19 mmol/mol), in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Glycemic control was achieved in 15.3% and 40.2%, and triple metabolic control was achieved in 5.5% and 10.1%, respectively. Only 1.5% of patients met all the criteria of being non-obese, non-smoker, exercising, and under triple metabolic control. Low education level was a significant predictor of poor glycemic control in both groups. Conclusions: Few patients with Type 2, and even fewer with Type 1 diabetes have optimal metabolic control in Turkey. TEMD study will provide evidence-based information to policy makers to focus more on the quality and sustainability of diabetes care in order to reduce the national burden of the disease. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.Item Utilization of statins and LDL-cholesterol target attainment in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes - a nationwide cross-sectional study (TEMD dyslipidemia study)(BioMed Central Ltd, 2020) Bayram F.; Sonmez A.; Haymana C.; Sabuncu T.; Dizdar O.S.; Gurkan E.; Carlioglu A.K.; Agbaht K.; Ozdemir D.; Demirci I.; Barcin C.; Salman S.; Tetiker T.; Balci M.K.; Kebapci N.; Ersoy C.; Yumuk V.; Toth P.P.; Satman I.; Guldiken S.; Ayturk S.; Yilmaz M.; Asik M.; Dinccag N.; Cakmak R.; Turker F.; Idiz C.; Hacisahinogullari H.; Bagdemir E.; Yildiz B.; Haliloglu O.; Sancak S.; Ozsari L.; Cagiltay E.; Deyneli O.; Imre E.; Gonen S.; Boysan S.N.; Altuntas Y.; Ozturk F.Y.; Mert M.; Piskinpasa H.; Aydin H.; Imamoglu S.; Gul O.O.; Kiyici S.K.; Cetinarslan B.; Selek A.; Dogru T.; Kirik A.; Efe B.; Kaya A.; Cordan I.; Baldane S.; Kirac C.O.; Capa Z.; Cesur M.; Yetkin I.; Corapcioglu D.; Canlar S.; Yildiz O.B.; Sendur S.N.; Cakir B.; Corakci A.; Kutlu M.; Tutuncu N.B.; Bozkus Y.; Cakal E.; Demirbas B.; Ertek S.; Altay M.; Dagdeviren M.; Abedi A.H.; Cetinkalp S.; Ozisik H.; Oruk G.G.; Yener S.; Saydam B.O.; Guney E.; Unubol M.; Yaylali G.F.; Topsakal S.; Hekimsoy Z.; Akbaba G.; Aslan I.; Dalkiran S.; Akbay E.; Gul K.; Yilmaz M.O.; Bozkirli E.; Altuntas S.C.; Atmaca A.; Durmuş E.T.; Mete T.; Kutluturk F.; Kucukler F.K.; Dikbas O.; Akin S.; Nuhoglu I.; Ersoz H.O.; Bayraktaroglu T.; Sisman P.; Sahin I.; Cetin S.; Capoglu I.; Akbas E.M.; Ucler R.; Eren M.A.; Tuzcu A.K.; Pekkolay Z.; Ozkaya M.; Araz M.Background: Attaining acceptable levels of LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The LDL-C target attainment and the characteristics of patients attaining these targets were investigated in this study. Furthermore, the reasons for not choosing statins and the physicians’ attitudes on the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia were also examined. Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted in tertiary centers for diabetes management. Adult patients with T2DM, who were under follow-up for at least a year in outpatient clinics, were consecutively enrolled for the study. LDL-C goals were defined as below 70 mg/dL for patients with macrovascular complications or diabetic nephropathy, and below 100 mg/dL for other patients. Data about lipid-lowering medications were self-reported. Results: A total of 4504 patients (female: 58.6%) were enrolled for the study. The mean HbA1c and diabetes duration was 7.73 ± 1.74% and 10.9 ± 7.5 years, respectively. The need for statin treatment was 94.9% (n = 4262); however, only 42.4% (n = 1807) of these patients were under treatment, and only 24.8% (n = 448) of these patients achieved LDL-C targets. The main reason for statin discontinuation was negative media coverage (87.5%), while only a minority of patients (12.5%) mentioned side effects. Physicians initiated lipid-lowering therapy in only 20.3% of patients with high LDL-C levels. It was observed that the female gender was a significant independent predictor of not attaining LDL-C goals (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59–0.83). Conclusions: Less than 50 % of patients with T2DM who need statins were under treatment, and only a quarter of them attained their LDL-C targets. There exists a significant gap between the guideline recommendations and the real-world evidence in the treatment of dyslipidemia in T2DM. © 2020, The Author(s).