Browsing by Author "Selcuk B."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Patients with Dysphagia: A Delphi-Based Consensus Study of Experts in Turkey-Part II: Rehabilitation
    (Springer, 2021) Umay E.; Eyigor S.; Ertekin C.; Unlu Z.; Selcuk B.; Bahat G.; Karahan A.Y.; Secil Y.; Gurcay E.; Kıylioglu N.; Keles B.Y.; Giray E.; Tikiz C.; Gezer I.A.; Yalıman A.; Sen E.I.; Vural M.; Saylam G.; Akaltun M.S.; Sari A.; Alicura S.; Karaahmet F.; Inanir M.; Demirhan A.; Aydeniz B.; Bilgilisoy M.; Yuksel A.; Ozcete Z.A.; Calik Y.; Alemdaroglu E.; Keskin D.; Sahin S.; Oztekin M.F.; Sezgin B.; Karaahmet O.
    Dysphagia is one of the most common and important complications of stroke. It is an independent marker of poor outcome following acute stroke and it continues to be effective for many years. This consensus-based guideline is not only a good address to clinical questions in practice for the clinical management of dysphagia including management, diagnosis, follow-up, and rehabilitation methods, but also includes detailed algorithms for these topics. The recommendation paper has been written by a multidisciplinary team and offers 117 recommendations for stroke patients with dysphagia. While focusing on management principles, diagnosis, and follow-up in the 1st part (45 items), rehabilitation details were evaluated in the 2nd part (72 items). © 2021, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Nation-wide analysis of the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on daily urology practice in Turkey
    (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2021) Bozkurt O.; Sen V.; Irer B.; Sagnak L.; Onal B.; Tanidir Y.; Karabay E.; Kaya C.; Ceyhan E.; Baser A.; Duran M.B.; Suer E.; Celen I.; Selvi I.; Ucer O.; Karakoc S.; Sarikaya E.; Ozden E.; Deger D.; Egriboyun S.; Ongun S.; Gurboga O.; Asutay M.K.; Kazaz I.O.; Yilmaz I.O.; Kisa E.; Demirkiran E.D.; Horsanali O.; Akarken I.; Kizer O.; Eren H.; Ucar M.; Cebeci O.O.; Kizilay F.; Comez K.; Mercimek M.N.; Ozkent M.S.; Izol V.; Gudeloglu A.; Ozturk B.; Akbaba K.T.; Polat S.; Gucuk A.; Ziyan A.; Selcuk B.; Akdeniz F.; Turgut H.; Sabuncu K.; Kaygisiz O.; Ersahin V.; Kahraman H.I.; Guzelsoy M.; Demir O.
    Objective: To present a nation-wide analysis of the workload of urology departments in Turkey week-by-week during Covid-19 pandemic. Methodology: The centres participating in the study were divided into three groups as tertiary referral centres, state hospitals and private practice hospitals. The number of outpatients, inpatients, daily interventions and urological surgeries were recorded prospectively between 9-March-2020 and 31-May-2020. All these variables were recorded for the same time interval of 2019 as well. The weekly change of the workload of urology during pandemic period was evaluated, also the workload of urology and the distributions of certain urological surgeries were compared between the pandemic period and the same time interval of the year 2019. Results: A total of 51 centres participated in the study. The number of outpatients, inpatients, urological surgeries and daily interventions were found to be dramatically decreased by the 3rd week of pandemics in state hospitals and tertiary referral centres; however, the daily urological practice were similar in private practice hospitals throughout the pandemic period. When the workload of urology in pandemic period and the same time interval of the year 2019 were compared, a huge decrease was observed in all variables during pandemic period. However, temporary measures like ureteral stenting, nephrostomy placement and percutaneous cystostomy have been found to increase during Covid-19 pandemic compared with normal life. Conclusions: Covid-19 pandemic significantly affected the routine daily urological practice likewise other subspecialties and priority was given to emergent and non-deferrable surgeries by urologists in concordance with published clinical guidelines. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Best Practice Recommendations for Geriatric Dysphagia Management with 5 Ws and 1H
    (Korean Geriatrics Society, 2022) Umay E.; Eyigor S.; Bahat G.; Halil M.; Giray E.; Unsal P.; Unlu Z.; Tikiz C.; Vural M.; Cincin A.T.; Bengisu S.; Gurcay E.; Keseroglu K.; Aydeniz B.; Karaca E.C.; Karaca B.; Yalcin A.; Ozsurekci C.; Seyidoglu D.; Yilmaz O.; Alicura S.; Tokgoz S.; Selcuk B.; Sen E.I.; Karahan A.Y.; Yaliman A.; Ozkok S.; Ilhan B.; Oytun M.G.; Ozturk Z.A.; Akin S.; Yavuz B.; Akaltun M.S.; Sari A.; Inanir M.; Bilgilisoy M.; Çaliskan Z.; Saylam G.; Ozer T.; Eren Y.; Bicakli D.H.; Keskin D.; Ulger Z.; Demirhan A.; Calik Y.; Saka B.; Yigman Z.A.; Ozturk E.A.
    Background: Dysphagia is a geriatric syndrome. Changes in the whole body that occur with aging also affect swallowing functions and cause presbyphagia. This condition may progress to oro-pharyngeal and/or esophageal dysphagia in the presence of secondary causes that increase in incidence with aging. However, no study has been published that provides recommendations for use in clinical practice that addresses in detail all aspects of the management of dysphagia in geriatric individuals. This study aimed to answer almost all potential questions and problems in the management of geriatric dysphagia in clinical practice. Methods: A multidisciplinary team created this recommendation guide using the seven-step and three-round modified Delphi method via e-mail. The study included 39 experts from 29 centers in 14 cities. Results: Based on the 5W and 1H method, we developed 216 detailed recommendations for older adults from the per-spective of different disciplines dealing with older people. Conclusion: This consensus-based recommendation is a useful guide to address practical clinical questions in the diagnosis, rehabilita-tion, and follow-up for the management of geriatric dysphagia and also contains detailed com-mentary on these issues. © 2022 by The Korean Geriatrics Society.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Patients with Dysphagia: A Delphi-Based Consensus Study of Experts in Turkey-Part I: Management, Diagnosis, and Follow-up
    (Springer, 2022) Umay E.; Eyigor S.; Ertekin C.; Unlu Z.; Selcuk B.; Bahat G.; Karahan A.Y.; Secil Y.; Gurcay E.; Kıylioglu N.; Yavuz Keles B.; Giray E.; Tikiz C.; Albayrak Gezer I.; Yalıman A.; Sen E.I.; Vural M.; Saylam G.; Akaltun M.S.; Sari A.; Alicura S.; Karaahmet F.; Inanir M.; Demirhan A.; Aydeniz B.; Bilgilisoy M.; Yuksel A.; Ozcete Z.A.; Calik Y.; Alemdaroglu E.; Keskin D.; Sahin S.; Oztekin M.F.; Sezgin B.; Karaahmet O.; Bengisu S.; Yalcin Gokler T.; Mercimekci S.
    Dysphagia is one of the most common and important complications of stroke. It is an independent marker of poor outcome after acute stroke and may become chronic after the acute period and continues to affect all aspects of the patient's life. Patients with stroke may encounter any of the medical branches in the emergency room or outpatient clinic, and as in our country, there may not be specialists specific for dysphagia, such as speech-language pathologists (SLP), in every hospital. This study aimed to raise awareness and create a common opinion of medical specialists for stroke patients with dysphagia. This recommendation paper has been written by a multidisciplinary team and offers 45 recommendations for stroke patients with dysphagia. It was created using the eight-step Delphi round via e-mail. This study is mostly specific to Turkey. However, since it contains detailed recommendations from the perspective of various disciplines associated with stroke, this consensus-based recommendation paper is not only a useful guide to address clinical questions in practice for the clinical management of dysphagia in terms of management, diagnosis, and follow-up, but also includes detailed comments for these topics. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.