Browsing by Author "Selvi O."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2023) Karacin C.; Oksuzoglu B.; Demirci A.; Keskinkılıç M.; Baytemür N.K.; Yılmaz F.; Selvi O.; Erdem D.; Avşar E.; Paksoy N.; Demir N.; Göksu S.S.; Türker S.; Bayram E.; Çelebi A.; Yılmaz H.; Kuzu Ö.F.; Kahraman S.; Gökmen İ.; Sakin A.; Alkan A.; Nayır E.; Uğraklı M.; Acar Ö.; Ertürk İ.; Demir H.; Aslan F.; Sönmez Ö.; Korkmaz T.; Celayir Ö.M.; Karadağ İ.; Kayıkçıoğlu E.; Şakalar T.; Öktem İ.N.; Eren T.; Urul E.; Mocan E.E.; Kalkan Z.; Yıldırım N.; Ergün Y.; Akagündüz B.; Karakaya S.; Kut E.; Teker F.; Demirel B.Ç.; Karaboyun K.; Almuradova E.; Ünal O.Ü.; Oyman A.; Işık D.; Okutur K.; Öztosun B.; Gülbağcı B.B.; Kalender M.E.; Şahin E.; Seyyar M.; Özdemir Ö.; Selçukbiricik F.; Kanıtez M.; Dede İ.; Gümüş M.; Gökmen E.; Yaren A.; Menekşe S.; Ebinç S.; Aksoy S.; İmamoğlu G.İ.; Altınbaş M.; Çetin B.; Uluç B.O.; Er Ö.; Karadurmuş N.; Erdoğan A.P.; Artaç M.; Tanrıverdi Ö.; Çiçin İ.; Şendur M.A.N.; Oktay E.; Bayoğlu İ.V.; Paydaş S.; Aydıner A.; Salim D.K.; Geredeli Ç.; Yavuzşen T.; Doğan M.; Hacıbekiroğlu İ.
    Background: There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods: A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results: The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0–14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9–6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8–7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6–6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5–8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5–4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion: Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET. © 2023, The Author(s).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Correction: Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy (BMC Cancer, (2023), 23, 1, (136), 10.1186/s12885-023-10609-8)
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2023) Karacin C.; Oksuzoglu B.; Demirci A.; Keskinkılıç M.; Baytemür N.K.; Yılmaz F.; Selvi O.; Erdem D.; Avşar E.; Paksoy N.; Demir N.; Göksu S.S.; Türker S.; Bayram E.; Çelebi A.; Yılmaz H.; Kuzu Ö.F.; Kahraman S.; Gökmen İ.; Sakin A.; Alkan A.; Nayır E.; Uğraklı M.; Acar Ö.; Ertürk İ.; Demir H.; Aslan F.; Sönmez Ö.; Korkmaz T.; Celayir Ö.M.; Karadağ İ.; Kayıkçıoğlu E.; Şakalar T.; Öktem İ.N.; Eren T.; Erul E.; Mocan E.E.; Kalkan Z.; Yıldırım N.; Ergün Y.; Akagündüz B.; Karakaya S.; Kut E.; Teker F.; Demirel B.Ç.; Karaboyun K.; Almuradova E.; Ünal O.Ü.; Oyman A.; Işık D.; Okutur K.; Öztosun B.; Gülbağcı B.B.; Kalender M.E.; Şahin E.; Seyyar M.; Özdemir Ö.; Selçukbiricik F.; Kanıtez M.; Dede İ.; Gümüş M.; Gökmen E.; Yaren A.; Menekşe S.; Ebinç S.; Aksoy S.; İmamoğlu G.İ.; Altınbaş M.; Çetin B.; Uluç B.O.; Er Ö.; Karadurmuş N.; Erdoğan A.P.; Artaç M.; Tanrıverdi Ö.; Çiçin İ.; Şendur M.A.N.; Oktay E.; Bayoğlu İ.V.; Paydaş S.; Aydıner A.; Salim D.K.; Geredeli Ç.; Yavuzşen T.; Doğan M.; Hacıbekiroğlu İ.
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the author name of Enes Erul. Incorrect: Enes Urul Correct: Enes Erul, The original article [1] has been corrected. © 2023, The Author(s).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of everolimus plus hormonal treatment after cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor; real-life experience, A TOG study
    (Springer, 2024) Beypınar İ.; Demir H.; Yaslıkaya Ş.; Köşeci T.; Demir B.; Çolak G.; Ağaoğlu A.B.; Şahbazlar M.; Şancı P.C.; Çabuk D.; Işık U.; Şahin E.; Coşkun A.; Caner B.; Aykut T.; Artaç M.; Duygulu M.E.; Sever N.; Öksüz S.; Turan N.; Aykan M.B.; Tüzün E.K.; Uysal M.; Uğurlu İ.; Sakin A.; Acar C.; Özaşkın D.; Şakalar T.; Keskinkılıç M.; Yavuzşen T.; Köse N.; Ertürk İ.; Yıldırım N.; Balçık O.Y.; Alkan A.; Selvi O.; Erçin E.; Ünal O.Ü.; Karaçin C.
    Purpose: In advanced breast cancer, endocrine therapy is preferred in the absence of visceral crisis. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi) are the gold standards. The selection of subsequent treatments after CDKi treatment is still controversial, and the efficacy of everolimus (EVE) combinations is unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of EVE after CDKi administration in real-life experiences. Method: The study received data from 208 patients from 26 cancer centers. Demographic and histologic features, diagnosis, progression, last visit dates, and toxicities were recorded. This study was a retrospective case series. Results: One hundred and seven patients received palbociclib, while 101 patients received ribociclib as a CDKi. The overall response and disease control rates of EVE combinations were 60% and 88%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the absence of liver metastasis, age > 40 years, better type of response, and immediate treatment after CDKi were related to increased progression-free survival. Liver metastasis and response type were significantly associated with overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, response remained significant in terms of progression-free survival, while response type, liver metastatic disease, and hematologic toxicity were prognostic in terms of overall survival. Conclusion: This study provides evidence of the benefits of EVE combinations after CDKi treatment. EVE combinations may be more appropriate for patients with non-liver metastasis, and the first treatment response shows the benefit of treatment. In addition, immediate treatment after CDKi treatment is more beneficial than later lines of treatment. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Factors Affecting Recurrence and Survival in Stage IIA Colon Cancer Patients
    (S. Karger AG, 2024) Erciyestepe M.; Selvi O.; Dinç G.; Öztürk A.E.; Aydın O.; Sonuşen Ş.D.; Güneş T.K.; Avcı T.; Vatansever S.; Çelik E.; Atcı M.M.
    Introduction: Our study delves into the intricate interplay of risk factors and the strategic selection of adjuvant therapy, scrutinizing their influence on recurrence and survival outcomes in stage IIA (T3N0M0) colon cancer patients. Materials and Methods: The study examined the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for stage IIA colon cancer. Identification of stage IIA (pT3N0M0) colon cancer involved a comprehensive review of postoperative clinical records and histological reports. Parameters such as demographic data, tumor characteristics, microsatellite instability status, tumor locations, recurrence risk factors, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and adjuvant treatments were systematically evaluated. Results: In our study involving 220 patients, 138 were male (62.7%), with a median age of 62 years and a median body mass index of 25.1 kg/m2. In the patient group without risk factors, no statistically significant difference was detected in disease-free survival (DFS) rates between those who received treatment and those who did not (p = 0.546). DFS rates of patients with >1 risk factor were statistically significantly lower than those with a single risk factor (p = 0.017). In patients with >1 risk factor, the DFS of those who did not receive adjuvant treatment was significantly lower than those who received adjuvant treatment (p < 0.001). In the patient group with recurrence, when adjuvant treatments were considered, recurrence was significantly higher in the group receiving capecitabine (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The decision for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA colon cancer patients involves careful consideration of various parameters and risk factors. The evolving landscape of research may refine recommendations, ensuring optimal treatment outcomes while minimizing unnecessary toxicity. © 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.