Browsing by Author "Sevinc, A"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Regorafenib Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma Beyond Bevacizumab-Based Therapy: A Large, Multicenter, Real-Life Study
    Tünbekici, S; Yuksel, HC; Acar, C; Sahin, G; Orman, S; Majidova, N; Coskun, A; Seyyar, M; Dilek, MS; Kara, M; Disli, AK; Demir, T; Kolkiran, N; Sahbazlar, M; Demirciler, E; Kus, F; Aytac, A; Menekse, S; Yucel, H; Biter, S; Koseci, T; Unsal, A; Ozveren, A; Sevinc, A; Goker, E; Gürsoy, P
    Background/Objectives: In the REGOMA trial, regorafenib demonstrated an overall survival advantage over lomustine, and it has become a recommended treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in guidelines. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of regorafenib as a third-line treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma who progressed while taking bevacizumab-based therapy. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study in Turkey included 65 patients treated between 2021 and 2023 across 19 oncology centers. The main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, progression after second-line bevacizumab-based treatment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of <= 2. Patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. Results: The median age of the patients was 53 years (18-67 years), with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% Confidence Interval: 2.23-2.75) and a median overall survival of 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.52-4.68). The median overall survival was improved in patients who received subsequent therapy after regorafenib treatment compared with those who did not (p = 0.022). Progression-free survival was longer in patients with ECOG 0-1 than in those with ECOG 2 (p = 0.042). The safety profile was consistent with that of the REGOMA trial, with no drug-related deaths observed. Conclusions: Regorafenib shows good efficacy and safety as a third-line treatment for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab-based therapy. This study supports the use of regorafenib and emphasizes the need for further randomized studies to validate its role and optimize treatment strategies.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    EGFR Mutation in Patients with NSCLC and Its Relationship Between Survival and Clinicopathological Features: An Update Analysis
    Ozturk, A; Celik, S; Kodaz, H; Yildiz, I; Ocak, A; Hacibekiroglu, I; Bayoglu, IV; Ercelep, O; Ekinci, AS; Menekse, S; Gumusay, O; Oven, B; Aldemir, MN; Geredeli, C; Baykara, M; Uysal, M; Sevinc, A; Aksoy, A; Ulas, A; Inanc, M; Tanriverdi, O; Avci, N; Turan, N; Gumus, M
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Frequency of EGFR Mutation in Nsclc and Its Relationship with Clinicopathological Features: A Multicenter Asmo Trial
    Yuksel, S; Kodaz, H; Yildiz, I; Odabasi, H; Ocak, A; Bayoglu, IV; Hacibekiroglu, I; Ercelep, O; Ekinci, AS; Erdogan, B; Mert, AG; Karaca, H; Salman, T; Menekse, S; Gumusay, O; Ustaalioglu, BO; Aldemir, MN; Geredeli, C; Baykara, M; Uysal, M; Sevinc, A; Aksoy, A; Ulas, A; Inanc, M; Tanriverdi, O; Avci, N; Turan, N; Aliustaoglu, M; Gumus, M
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Is eribulin treatment prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with this drug? Retrospective analysis of a multicentre study
    Oruc, Z; Kaplan, MA; Geredeli, C; Sari, NY; Ozaslan, E; Aytekin, A; Elkiran, ET; Koca, S; Dogan, M; Turan, N; Yuce, O; Sevinc, A; Ercelep, O; Isikdogan, A
    Purpose: This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors for survival and the reliability and the effectiveness of eribulin therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Methods: A total of 80 patients treated with eribulin in 12 medical oncology centers in Turkey between 2013-2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen potential prognostic variables were assessed for analysis. Results: The patients had received a median of 5 prior chemotherapy regimens and a median of 3 eribulin cycles for MBC. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% Cl: 4.1-7.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95 % Cl: 6-15). Multivariate analysis showed that eribulin treatment line was shown to have independent prognostic significance for PFS. PFS difference was demostrated in patients who received 3 chemotherapy lines for advanced disease compared to those who had more than 3 chemotherapy lines [median PFS; 3 lines: 8.6 months (6.2-11) and >3 lines: 4.6 months (3.7-4.6) p=0.00]. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 52.5 and 35% in patients treated with three lines and with >3 previous chemotherapeutic regimens. Most common toxicities were neutropenia (62.5%), fatigue (52.5%), alopecia (50%) and nausea (37.5%). Conclusions: Eribulin treatment line was identified as indepedent prognostic factor for PFS in MBC patients.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Is eribulin treatment prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with this drug? Retrospective analysis of a multicentre study
    Oruc, Z; Kaplan, MA; Geredeli, C; Sari, NY; Ozaslan, E; Aytekin, A; Elkiran, ET; Koca, S; Dogan, M; Turan, N; Yuce, O; Sevinc, A; Ercelep, O; Isikdogan, A
    Purpose: This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors for survival and the reliability and the effectiveness of eribulin therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Methods: A total of 80 patients treated with eribulin in 12 medical oncology centers in Turkey between 2013-2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen potential prognostic variables were assessed for analysis. Results: The patients had received a median of 5 prior chemotherapy regimens and a median of 3 eribulin cycles for MBC. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95 % CI: 6-15). Multivariate analysis showed that eribulin treatment line was shown to have independent prognostic significance for PFS. PFS difference was demostrated in patients who received 3 chemotherapy lines for advanced disease compared to those who had more than 3 chemotherapy lines [median PFS; 3 lines: 8.6 months (6.2-11) and >3 lines: 4.6 months (3.7-16) p=0.00]. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 52.5 and 35% in patients treated with three lines and with >3 previous chemotherapeutic regimens. Most common toxicities were neutropenia (62.5%), fatigue (52.5%), alopecia (50%) and nausea (37.5%). Conclusions: Eribulin treatment line was identified as indepedent prognostic factor for PFS in MBC patients.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    XELOX Plus Bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology
    Duran, AO; Karaca, H; Besiroglu, M; Bayoglu, IV; Menekse, S; Yapici, HS; Yazilitas, D; Bahceci, A; Uysal, M; Sevinc, A; Hacibekiroglu, I; Aksoy, A; Tanriverdi, O; Arpaci, E; Inanc, M; Dane, F; Ozkan, M
    Background: XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC. Materials and Methods: A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n=111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%), stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95% CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95% CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p=0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95% CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95% CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p=0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy and safety of folfiri plus aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-life data from Turkish oncology group
    Erol, C; Sendur, MAN; Bilgetekin, I; Garbioglu, DB; Hamdard, J; Akbas, S; Hizal, M; Arslan, C; Sevinc, A; Kucukarda, A; Erdem, D; Kahraman, S; Cakir, E; Demirkiran, A; On, S; Dogan, I; Erdogan, AP; Koca, S; Kubilay, P; Eren, OO; Cilbir, E; Celik, E; Araz, M; Ozyukseler, DT; Yildirim, ME; Bahceci, A; Taskaynatan, H; Oyman, A; Deniz, GI; Menekse, S; Kut, E; Gulmez, A; Sakin, A; Nayir, E; Acar, R; Sen, E; Inal, A; Turhal, S; Kaya, AO; Paydas, S; Tastekin, D; Hacibekiroglu, I; Cincin, I; Bilici, A; Mandel, NM; Dede, DS; Akinci, MB; Oksuzoglu, B; Uncu, D; Yalcin, B; Artac, M
    Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial.