Browsing by Author "Seyyar M."

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2023) Karacin C.; Oksuzoglu B.; Demirci A.; Keskinkılıç M.; Baytemür N.K.; Yılmaz F.; Selvi O.; Erdem D.; Avşar E.; Paksoy N.; Demir N.; Göksu S.S.; Türker S.; Bayram E.; Çelebi A.; Yılmaz H.; Kuzu Ö.F.; Kahraman S.; Gökmen İ.; Sakin A.; Alkan A.; Nayır E.; Uğraklı M.; Acar Ö.; Ertürk İ.; Demir H.; Aslan F.; Sönmez Ö.; Korkmaz T.; Celayir Ö.M.; Karadağ İ.; Kayıkçıoğlu E.; Şakalar T.; Öktem İ.N.; Eren T.; Urul E.; Mocan E.E.; Kalkan Z.; Yıldırım N.; Ergün Y.; Akagündüz B.; Karakaya S.; Kut E.; Teker F.; Demirel B.Ç.; Karaboyun K.; Almuradova E.; Ünal O.Ü.; Oyman A.; Işık D.; Okutur K.; Öztosun B.; Gülbağcı B.B.; Kalender M.E.; Şahin E.; Seyyar M.; Özdemir Ö.; Selçukbiricik F.; Kanıtez M.; Dede İ.; Gümüş M.; Gökmen E.; Yaren A.; Menekşe S.; Ebinç S.; Aksoy S.; İmamoğlu G.İ.; Altınbaş M.; Çetin B.; Uluç B.O.; Er Ö.; Karadurmuş N.; Erdoğan A.P.; Artaç M.; Tanrıverdi Ö.; Çiçin İ.; Şendur M.A.N.; Oktay E.; Bayoğlu İ.V.; Paydaş S.; Aydıner A.; Salim D.K.; Geredeli Ç.; Yavuzşen T.; Doğan M.; Hacıbekiroğlu İ.
    Background: There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods: A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results: The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0–14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9–6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8–7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6–6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5–8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5–4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion: Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET. © 2023, The Author(s).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Correction: Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy (BMC Cancer, (2023), 23, 1, (136), 10.1186/s12885-023-10609-8)
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2023) Karacin C.; Oksuzoglu B.; Demirci A.; Keskinkılıç M.; Baytemür N.K.; Yılmaz F.; Selvi O.; Erdem D.; Avşar E.; Paksoy N.; Demir N.; Göksu S.S.; Türker S.; Bayram E.; Çelebi A.; Yılmaz H.; Kuzu Ö.F.; Kahraman S.; Gökmen İ.; Sakin A.; Alkan A.; Nayır E.; Uğraklı M.; Acar Ö.; Ertürk İ.; Demir H.; Aslan F.; Sönmez Ö.; Korkmaz T.; Celayir Ö.M.; Karadağ İ.; Kayıkçıoğlu E.; Şakalar T.; Öktem İ.N.; Eren T.; Erul E.; Mocan E.E.; Kalkan Z.; Yıldırım N.; Ergün Y.; Akagündüz B.; Karakaya S.; Kut E.; Teker F.; Demirel B.Ç.; Karaboyun K.; Almuradova E.; Ünal O.Ü.; Oyman A.; Işık D.; Okutur K.; Öztosun B.; Gülbağcı B.B.; Kalender M.E.; Şahin E.; Seyyar M.; Özdemir Ö.; Selçukbiricik F.; Kanıtez M.; Dede İ.; Gümüş M.; Gökmen E.; Yaren A.; Menekşe S.; Ebinç S.; Aksoy S.; İmamoğlu G.İ.; Altınbaş M.; Çetin B.; Uluç B.O.; Er Ö.; Karadurmuş N.; Erdoğan A.P.; Artaç M.; Tanrıverdi Ö.; Çiçin İ.; Şendur M.A.N.; Oktay E.; Bayoğlu İ.V.; Paydaş S.; Aydıner A.; Salim D.K.; Geredeli Ç.; Yavuzşen T.; Doğan M.; Hacıbekiroğlu İ.
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the author name of Enes Erul. Incorrect: Enes Urul Correct: Enes Erul, The original article [1] has been corrected. © 2023, The Author(s).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Treatment efficacy of ribociclib or palbociclib plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    (Newlands Press Ltd, 2023) Kahraman S.; Erul E.; Seyyar M.; Gumusay O.; Bayram E.; Demirel B.C.; Acar O.; Aksoy S.; Baytemur N.K.; Sahin E.; Cabuk D.; Basaran G.; Paydas S.; Yaren A.; Guven D.C.; Erdogan A.P.; Demirci U.; Yasar A.; Bayoglu İ.V.; Hizal M.; Gulbagci B.; Paksoy N.; Davarci S.E.; Yilmaz F.; Dogan O.; Orhan S.O.; Kayikcioglu E.; Aytac A.; Keskinkilic M.; Mocan E.E.; Unal O.U.; Aydin E.; Yucel H.; Isik D.; Eren O.; Uluc B.O.; Ozcelik M.; Hacibekiroglu I.; Aydiner A.; Demir H.; Oksuzoglu B.; Cilbir E.; Cubukcu E.; Cetin B.; Oktay E.; Erol C.; Okutur S.K.; Yildirim N.; Alkan A.; Selcukbiricik F.; Aksoy A.; Karakas Y.; Ozkanli G.; Duman B.B.; Aydin D.; Dulgar O.; Er M.M.; Teker F.; Yavuzsen T.; Aykan M.B.; Inal A.; Iriagac Y.; Kalkan N.O.; Keser M.; Sakalar T.; Menekse S.; Kut E.; Bilgin B.; Karaoglanoglu M.; Sunar V.; Ozdemir O.; Turhal N.S.; Karadurmus N.; Yalcin B.; Nahit Sendur M.A.
    Background: Ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib are currently approved CDK4/6 inhibitors along with aromatase inhibitors as the first-line standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The authors report retrospective real-life data for 600 patients with estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with ribociclib and palbociclib in combination with letrozole. Results & conclusion: The results demonstrated that the combination of palbociclib or ribociclib with letrozole has similar progression-free survival and overall survival benefit in real life for the patient group with similar clinical features. Specifically, endocrine sensitivity may be a factor to be considered in the treatment preference. © 2023 Future Medicine Ltd.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The real-world outcomes of Lutetium-177 PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Turkish Oncology Group multicenter study
    (John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2024) Almuradova E.; Seyyar M.; Arak H.; Tamer F.; Kefeli U.; Koca S.; Sen E.; Telli T.A.; Karatas F.; Gokmen I.; Turhal N.S.; Sakalar T.; Ayhan M.; Ekinci F.; Hafizoglu E.; Kahraman S.; Kesen O.; Unal C.; Alan O.; Celik S.; Yekeduz E.; Omur O.; Gokmen E.
    Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a challenging condition to treat despite recent advancements. This retrospective study aimed to assess the activity and tolerability of Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) in mCRPC patients across multiple cancer centers in Turkey. The study included 165 patients who received at least one cycle of Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT, with the majority having bone metastases and undergone prior treatments. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were assessed before each treatment cycle, and the biochemical response was evaluated in accordance with the Prostate Cancer Work Group 3 Criteria. The PSA decline of ≥50% was classified as a response, while an increase of ≥25% in PSA levels was indicative of progressive disease. Neither response nor progression was considered as stable disease. The Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT led to a significant PSA response, with 50.6% of patients achieving a >50% decrease in PSA levels. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 13.5 and 8.2 months, respectively. Patients receiving Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) had a higher OS compared to those receiving Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT alone (18.2 vs 12.3 months, P =.265). The treatment was generally well-tolerated, with manageable side effects such as anemia and thrombocytopenia. This study provides real-world evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT in mCRPC patients, particularly when used in combination with ARPIs. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence on the potential benefits of PSMA-targeted therapies in advanced prostate cancer. © 2023 UICC.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study
    (Nature Research, 2024) Özyurt N.; Alkan A.; Gülbağcı B.; Seyyar M.; Aydın E.; Şahbazlar M.; Türker M.; Kınıkoğlu O.; Yerlikaya T.; Dinç G.; Aytaç A.; Kalkan Z.; Ebinç S.; Gültürk İ.; Keskinkılıç M.; İşleyen Z.S.; Çağlayan D.; Türkel A.; Şakalar T.; Sekmek S.; Yıldırım N.; Koçak S.; Okutur K.; Özveren A.; Dursun B.; Kitaplı S.; Eren O.Ö.; Beypınar İ.; Hacıbekiroğlu İ.; Çabuk D.; Karaman E.; Acar Ö.; Paydaş S.; Eryılmaz M.K.; Demir B.; Oruç Z.; Yılmaz M.; Biricik F.S.; Salim D.K.; Tanrıverdi Ö.; Doğan M.
    The studies evaluating the impact of Her2 levels in neoadjuvant setting have conflicting data. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer(TNBC). In the study TNBC patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery were analyzed retrospectively. The primary aim of the study was to analyze the impact of Her2 status(Her2-0 and Her2-low) on pathological complete response (pCR). The secondary objectives were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). 620 female triple negative breast cancer patients were evaluated. 427 patients (68.9%) had Her2-0 and 193(31.1%) had her2-low pathology. The pCR rates were similar between Her2-0 and Her2-low patients (33.0% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.098). Although Her2-0 group has better DFS (106 vs. 50 months, p = 0.002), in multivariate analysis it had a HR of 0.74 (p = 0.06). In addition, OS was similar (131 vs. 105 months, p = 0.13) with a HR of 0.88 (p = 0.61). In multivariate analysis; presence of LVI (HR:2.2 (95% CI 1.1–3.5) p = 0.001), Clinical stage T1/T2 (HR:0.39 (95% CI 0.2–0.6) p < 0.001) and lymph node negativity (HR:0.35 (95% CI 0.1–0.9) p = 0.03) were independent factors for OS. Although there were pathological and clinical differences, the pCR, DFS and OS were similar between Her2-0 and Her2-low TNBC patients. The importance of Her2 status of TNBC in neoadjuvant setting should be further studied. © The Author(s) 2024.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Correction to: The prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study (Scientific Reports, (2024), 14, 1, (23556), 10.1038/s41598-024-75293-5)
    (Nature Research, 2025) Özyurt N.; Alkan A.; Gülbağcı B.; Seyyar M.; Aşık E.; Şahbazlar M.; Türker M.; Kınıkoğlu O.; Yerlikaya T.; Dinç G.; Aytaç A.; Kalkan Z.; Ebinç S.; Gültürk İ.; Keskinkılıç M.; İşleyen Z.S.; Çağlayan D.; Türkel A.; Aydın E.; Şakalar T.; Sekmek S.; Yıldırım N.; Koçak S.; Okutur K.; Özveren A.; Dursun B.; Kitaplı S.; Eren O.Ö.; Beypınar İ.; Hacıbekiroğlu İ.; Çabuk D.; Karaman E.; Acar Ö.; Paydaş S.; Eryılmaz M.K.; Demir B.; Oruç Z.; Yılmaz M.; Biricik F.S.; Salim D.K.; Tanrıverdi Ö.; Doğan M.
    Correction to: Scientific Reportshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75293-5, published online 09 October 2024 The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Esra Aşık which was incorrectly given as Esra Aydın. The original Article has been corrected. © The Author(s) 2024.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of first-line CDK 4-6 inhibitors in premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to treatment-related neutropenia on efficacy: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study
    (Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2025) Yildirim H.C.; Kapar C.; Koksal B.; Seyyar M.; Sanci P.C.; Guliyev M.; Perkin P.; Buyukkor M.; Yaslikaya S.; Majidova N.; Keskinkilic M.; Ozaskin D.; Avci T.; Gunes T.K.; Arcagok M.; Topal A.; Keskin G.S.Y.; Kavgaci G.; Yildirim N.; Celayir O.M.; Avci N.; Aslan F.; Alkan A.; Erciyestepe M.; Cengiz M.; Pehlivan M.; Gulmez A.; Beypinar I.; Basoglu Tuylu T.; Kayikcioglu E.; Chalabiyev E.; Turhal S.; Guzel H.G.; Ayas E.; Sahbazlar M.; Dulgar O.; Demir H.; Yavuzsen T.; Bayoglu V.; Kivrak Salim D.; Ozturk B.; Ozdemir F.; Kara O.; Oksuzoglu B.; Bal O.; Demirci N.S.; Yilmaz M.; Cabuk D.; Aksoy S.
    The only phase 3 study on the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in first-line treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer is the MONALEESA-7 study, and data on the effectiveness of palbociclib is limited. Data are also limited regarding the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia, the most common side effect of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in first-line treatment in patients with premenopausal metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to neutropenia on progression-free survival. Our study is a multicenter, retrospective study, and factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) were examined in patients diagnosed with metastatic premenopausal breast cancer from 29 different centers and receiving combination therapy containing palbociclib or ribociclib in the metastatic stage. 319 patients were included in the study. The mPFS for patients treated with palbociclib was 26.83 months, and for those receiving ribociclib, the mPFS was 29.86 months (p = 0.924). mPFS was 32.00 months in patients who received a reduced dose, and mPFS was 25.96 months in patients who could take the initial dose, and there was no statistical difference (p = 0.238). Liver metastasis, using a fulvestrant together with a CDK 4-6 inhibitor, ECOG PS 1 was found to be a negative prognostic factor. No new adverse events were observed. In our study, we found PFS over 27 months in patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer with CDK 4-6 inhibitors used in first-line treatment, similar to post-menopausal patients. We did not detect any difference between the effectiveness of the two CDK 4-6 inhibitors, and we showed that there was no decrease in the effectiveness of the CDK 4-6 inhibitor in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia. © 2024 Edizioni Scientifiche per l'Informazione su Farmaci e Terapia (Italian Society of Chemotherapy).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Regorafenib Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma Beyond Bevacizumab-Based Therapy: A Large, Multicenter, Real-Life Study
    (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 2025) Tünbekici S.; Yuksel H.C.; Acar C.; Sahin G.; Orman S.; Majidova N.; Coskun A.; Seyyar M.; Dilek M.S.; Kara M.; Dıslı A.K.; Demir T.; Kolkıran N.; Sahbazlar M.; Demırcıler E.; Kuş F.; Aytac A.; Menekse S.; Yucel H.; Biter S.; Koseci T.; Unsal A.; Ozveren A.; Sevınc A.; Goker E.; Gürsoy P.
    Background/Objectives: In the REGOMA trial, regorafenib demonstrated an overall survival advantage over lomustine, and it has become a recommended treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in guidelines. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of regorafenib as a third-line treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma who progressed while taking bevacizumab-based therapy. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study in Turkey included 65 patients treated between 2021 and 2023 across 19 oncology centers. The main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, progression after second-line bevacizumab-based treatment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of ≤2. Patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. Results: The median age of the patients was 53 years (18–67 years), with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% Confidence Interval: 2.23–2.75) and a median overall survival of 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.52–4.68). The median overall survival was improved in patients who received subsequent therapy after regorafenib treatment compared with those who did not (p = 0.022). Progression-free survival was longer in patients with ECOG 0–1 than in those with ECOG 2 (p = 0.042). The safety profile was consistent with that of the REGOMA trial, with no drug-related deaths observed. Conclusions: Regorafenib shows good efficacy and safety as a third-line treatment for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab-based therapy. This study supports the use of regorafenib and emphasizes the need for further randomized studies to validate its role and optimize treatment strategies. © 2024 by the authors.