Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All Contents
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Tayhan A."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: A methodological study
    (BMJ Publishing Group, 2019) Cetinkaya A.; Özmen D.; Uyar F.; Tayhan A.
    Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale. Setting Three hospitals affiliated to Public Hospitals Union General Secretariat in Manisa, a city located in Western Turkey. Design This was a methodological study. Participants A total of 230 women aged 22-49 years who previously underwent abortion and volunteered to participate in the study. Primary and secondary outcome measures Data analysis was performed using the SPSS and LISREL software. The Content Validity Index was calculated based on the values obtained from expert opinions. In the reliability analysis, Cronbach's alpha values were calculated for the overall scale and its subscales. To test the stability of the scale over time, the scale was readministered to 30 women in the study 15 days later and the test-retest values (Pearson's correlation coefficients) were determined. In the validity analysis, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. In the exploratory factor analysis, the principal component analysis was performed using the varimax rotation and the factor loading of the scale was examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to investigate the item-factor construct of the scale. Results The Content Validity Index was calculated as 0.86. The Cronbach's alpha values ranged between 0.83 and 0.94. The item-total correlation coefficients ranged between 0.36 and 0.72, and the test-retest reliability was 0.96 for the overall scale and its subscales (p<0.05). The total variance revealed by five factors was 75%. Confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed an acceptable compliance level (root mean square error of approximation=0.092, 2 /df=2.91, Goodness of Fit Index=0.831, Comparative Fit Index=0.928, p<0.001). Conclusions The results suggest that this scale has the potential for use in research and clinical settings to measure abortion stigma among women. © 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Attitudes and intentions of parents towards the COVID-19 vaccine for their children at a special moment of the pandemic
    (PeerJ Inc., 2024) Odabaşı N.Ç.; Tayhan A.; Mermer G.
    Background. This research was conducted following the FDA’s approval of the COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5 to 11. Our study aimed to evaluate parents’ intentions regarding vaccinating their children in response to the pandemic situation. This period was crucial for understanding parents’ initial reactions to health authority recommendations. Methods. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 940 parents. The data were obtained using the Personal Information Form, the COVID-19 Anxiety Scale, and the Scale of Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Vaccine. Descriptive data analysis involved calculating frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation values. We employed Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA tests for analysis. Additionally, various characteristics were analyzed using the two-way logistic regression method. Results. In the study, 85.1% of the parents reported having received the COVID-19 vaccine themselves. However, only 20% stated they would accept the COVID-19 vaccine for their children. The intention to vaccinate their children was influenced by factors such as the parent’s age, level of COVID-19 anxiety, vaccination status, and knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusion. Despite the FDA’s declaration, it was determined that more than two-thirds of parents were hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine for their children. Copyright 2024 Çelik Odabaşı et al.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Development and psychometric analysis: Fluoride varnish parent attitude, belief scale1
    (John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2024) Tayhan A.; Çetinkaya A.
    Objective: To develop a scale to determine parents’ attitudes and beliefs regarding fluoride varnish. Design and methods: This study had a cross-sectional design and was conducted between 2019 and 2021. A total of 810 parents were included in the study sample. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), discriminant validity, and convergent validity methods were used to estimate the scale validity. For reliability, the Cronbach alpha coefficient, item-total correlation coefficients, and test–retest method were used. Results: As a result of psychometric analysis, the scale was found to have a three-factor structure. The factor loads of the items were between 0.838 and 0.715. The three-factor construct showed a good fit in confirmatory factor analysis (X2(41): 110.06, p <.001; RMSEA: 0.065; RMSR, 0.02; GFI, 0.95; and NFI, 0.94). Cronbach's α coefficient on the scale was 0.85. The item-total correlation of the scale was found to be between 0.355 and 0.626. The test–retest intra-class correlation coefficient of the scale was 0.72. Conclusions: This study suggests that the developed scale is a reliable tool to evaluate the attitudes and beliefs of parents toward fluoride varnish. It is thought that the scale will make a contribution to public health. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Nursing and Midwifery Students' COVID-19 Vaccine Regrets and Future Vaccination Intentions: A Mixed Methods Study
    (John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2025) Tayhan A.; Bozhan Tayhan E.; Şahin Büyük D.
    Regret over COVID-19 vaccine decisions is a post-pandemic phenomenon that needs further research. This mixed-method research was conducted to examine nursing-midwifery students' COVID-19 vaccine decision regret and their intention to get vaccinated in the next pandemic. The research includes quantitative and qualitative research processes. In the first phase, a quantitative (cross-sectional) study was conducted, collecting data from 602 participants who met the inclusion criteria. In the second phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants. Data were collected using the Decision Regret Scale and semi-structured interview form. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test, one-way anova test, and inductive content analysis, and reported using Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study. In the study, it was determined that 96.3% of the participants had received the COVID-19 vaccine and 50.0% regretted getting vaccinated. As a result of the analysis of qualitative data, the following themes emerged that could reveal the reasons for vaccine regret; forced compliance, a strange pandemic, unknown effects, and vaccine hesitancy. Students' experiences in the COVID-19 pandemic have the potential to increase negative attitudes towards their vaccines. © 2025 The Author(s). Nursing & Health Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Relationship Between Primary School Teachers’ COVID-19 Fear Levels and COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes After the Start of Face-to-Face Education During the Pandemic Period: A School Health Study
    (John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2025) Tayhan A.; Işık K.
    Context: Starting face-to-face education while the COVID-19 pandemic was ongoing was a risk for public health. Determining teachers’ initial reactions to public health practices during this high-risk period may contribute to the redesign of public health and school nursing policies. Objective: The aim of this research is to examine the relationship between primary school teachers’ COVID-19 fear levels and COVID-19 vaccine attitudes. Design: The research has a descriptive correlational design. The data were obtained from teachers working in primary schools (n = 430). Simple random sampling method was used in the data collection process. Data were obtained with the Scale of Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Vaccine and Fear of COVID-19 Scale. Results: In the study, 50.5% of teachers reported that they were afraid of catching COVID-19, 41.9% said their risk of catching COVID-19 was “high,” and 87.7% reported that they voluntarily got the COVID-19 vaccine. Of the teachers, 4.6% (n = 20) stated that they regretted getting vaccinated. A positive and significant relationship was found between teachers’ Fear of COVID-19 Scale and COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale scores (r = 0.133, p < 0.001). Conclusions: During the pandemic, it was observed that teachers’ fear level of COVID-19 increased with the start of face-to-face education. In addition, it is seen that teachers started to have doubts about some public health practices. This may indicate that public health nurses should take a more active role in school health practices. © 2024 The Author(s). Public Health Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Manisa Celal Bayar University copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback