Browsing by Author "Teker, F"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy (vol 23, 136, 2023)
    Karacin, C; Oksuzoglu, B; Demirci, A; Keskinkiliç, M; Baytemür, NK; Yilmaz, F; Selvi, O; Erdem, D; Avsar, E; Paksoy, N; Demir, N; Göksu, SS; Türker, S; Bayram, E; Çelebi, A; Yilmaz, H; Kuzu, ÖF; Kahraman, S; Gökmen, I; Sakin, A; Alkan, A; Nayir, E; Ugrakli, M; Acar, Ö; Ertürk, I; Demir, H; Aslan, F; Sönmez, Ö; Korkmaz, T; Celayir, ÖM; Karadag, I; Kayikçioglu, E; Sakalar, T; Öktem, IN; Eren, T; Erul, E; Mocan, EE; Kalkan, Z; Yildirim, N; Ergün, Y; Akagündüz, B; Karakaya, S; Kut, E; Teker, F; Demirel, BÇ; Karaboyun, K; Almuradova, E; Ünal, OÜ; Oyman, A; Isik, D; Okutur, K; Öztosun, B; Gülbagci, BB; Kalender, ME; Sahin, E; Seyyar, M; Özdemir, Ö; Selçukbiricik, F; Kanitez, M; Dede, I; Gümüs, M; Gökmen, E; Yaren, A; Menekse, S; Ebinç, S; Aksoy, S; Imamoglu, GI; Altinbas, M; Çetin, B; Uluç, BO; Er, Ö; Karadurmus, N; Erdogan, AP; Artaç, M; Tanriverdi, Ö; Çiçin, I; Sendur, MAN; Oktay, E; Bayoglu, IV; Paydas, S; Aydiner, A; Salim, DK; Geredeli, Ç; Yavuzsen, T; Dogan, M; Hacibekiroglu, I
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy
    Karacin, C; Oksuzoglu, B; Demirci, A; Keskinkiliç, M; Baytemür, NK; Yilmaz, F; Selvi, O; Erdem, D; Avsar, E; Paksoy, N; Demir, N; Göksu, SS; Türker, S; Bayram, E; Çelebi, A; Yilmaz, H; Kuzu, ÖF; Kahraman, S; Gökmen, I; Sakin, A; Alkan, A; Nayir, E; Ugrakli, M; Acar, Ö; Ertürk, I; Demir, H; Aslan, F; Sönmez, Ö; Korkmaz, T; Celayir, ÖM; Karadag, I; Kayikçioglu, E; Sakalar, T; Öktem, IN; Eren, T; Urul, E; Mocan, EE; Kalkan, Z; Yildirim, N; Ergün, Y; Akagündüz, B; Karakaya, S; Kut, E; Teker, F; Demirel, BÇ; Karaboyun, K; Almuradova, E; Ünal, OÜ; Oyman, A; Isik, D; Okutur, K; Öztosun, B; Gülbagci, BB; Kalender, ME; Sahin, E; Seyyar, M; Özdemir, Ö; Selçukbiricik, F; Kanitez, M; Dede, I; Gümüs, M; Gökmen, E; Yaren, A; Menekse, S; Ebinç, S; Aksoy, S; Imamoglu, GI; Altinbas, M; Çetin, B; Uluç, BO; Er, Ö; Karadurmus, N; Erdogan, AP; Artaç, M; Tanriverdi, Ö; Çiçin, I; Sendur, MAN; Oktay, E; Bayoglu, IV; Paydas, S; Aydiner, A; Salim, DK; Geredeli, Ç; Yavuzsen, T; Dogan, M; Hacibekiroglu, I
    Background There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and >= 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0-14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9-6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8-7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6-6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5-8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5-4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The mean platelet volume may predict the development of isolated bone metastases in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective study of the Young Researchers Committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)
    Tanriverdi, O; Menekse, S; Teker, F; Oktay, E; Pilanci, KN; Gunaldi, M; Kocar, M; Kacan, T; Bahceci, A; Avci, N; Akman, T; Cokmert, S; Yesil-Cinkir, H; Yanmaz, MT
    Purpose: To determine the predictive value of the mean platelet volume (MPV) and the MPV/platelet count ratio on the development of isolated bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Methods: A total of 121 previously untreated female patients with isolated bone metastases from breast cancer (group 1) were included in this retrospective cohort study. The patients enrolled in this study had similar age, biological subtypes, and duration of follow-up after diagnosis. Group 1 was compared with both 71 previously untreated women with breast cancer with no metastases at all (group 2) and 39 healthy women (group 3). Demographic data, laboratory tests and histological features of all of the patients in groups 1 and 2 were recorded and the study variables from each of the three groups were compared. Results: In group 1, the cut-off value (9.2 fL) for the MPV was determined and patients were stratified into 4 subgroups. The MPV was higher in group 1 than in either group 2 or group 3. Group 1 patients had a MPV of 8.8 +/- 3.1 fL (mean 5.1, range: 6.1-15.6) and the cut-off value for MPV was 9.2fl. For patients in group 1, the MPV distribution was stratified into 4 groups as follows: group A included MPV values <6.08 fL, in group B values ranged from 6.09 to 8.46 fL, group C included values from 8.47 to 10.05 fL, and group D included patients with MPV values >10.06fL. MPV and the presence of lymphovascular invasion were found to be independent risk factors for the development of isolated bone metastases. Conclusion: We concluded that MPV can be used to predict the development of isolated bone metastases.