Browsing by Author "Uluç, BO"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy (vol 23, 136, 2023)
    Karacin, C; Oksuzoglu, B; Demirci, A; Keskinkiliç, M; Baytemür, NK; Yilmaz, F; Selvi, O; Erdem, D; Avsar, E; Paksoy, N; Demir, N; Göksu, SS; Türker, S; Bayram, E; Çelebi, A; Yilmaz, H; Kuzu, ÖF; Kahraman, S; Gökmen, I; Sakin, A; Alkan, A; Nayir, E; Ugrakli, M; Acar, Ö; Ertürk, I; Demir, H; Aslan, F; Sönmez, Ö; Korkmaz, T; Celayir, ÖM; Karadag, I; Kayikçioglu, E; Sakalar, T; Öktem, IN; Eren, T; Erul, E; Mocan, EE; Kalkan, Z; Yildirim, N; Ergün, Y; Akagündüz, B; Karakaya, S; Kut, E; Teker, F; Demirel, BÇ; Karaboyun, K; Almuradova, E; Ünal, OÜ; Oyman, A; Isik, D; Okutur, K; Öztosun, B; Gülbagci, BB; Kalender, ME; Sahin, E; Seyyar, M; Özdemir, Ö; Selçukbiricik, F; Kanitez, M; Dede, I; Gümüs, M; Gökmen, E; Yaren, A; Menekse, S; Ebinç, S; Aksoy, S; Imamoglu, GI; Altinbas, M; Çetin, B; Uluç, BO; Er, Ö; Karadurmus, N; Erdogan, AP; Artaç, M; Tanriverdi, Ö; Çiçin, I; Sendur, MAN; Oktay, E; Bayoglu, IV; Paydas, S; Aydiner, A; Salim, DK; Geredeli, Ç; Yavuzsen, T; Dogan, M; Hacibekiroglu, I
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy
    Karacin, C; Oksuzoglu, B; Demirci, A; Keskinkiliç, M; Baytemür, NK; Yilmaz, F; Selvi, O; Erdem, D; Avsar, E; Paksoy, N; Demir, N; Göksu, SS; Türker, S; Bayram, E; Çelebi, A; Yilmaz, H; Kuzu, ÖF; Kahraman, S; Gökmen, I; Sakin, A; Alkan, A; Nayir, E; Ugrakli, M; Acar, Ö; Ertürk, I; Demir, H; Aslan, F; Sönmez, Ö; Korkmaz, T; Celayir, ÖM; Karadag, I; Kayikçioglu, E; Sakalar, T; Öktem, IN; Eren, T; Urul, E; Mocan, EE; Kalkan, Z; Yildirim, N; Ergün, Y; Akagündüz, B; Karakaya, S; Kut, E; Teker, F; Demirel, BÇ; Karaboyun, K; Almuradova, E; Ünal, OÜ; Oyman, A; Isik, D; Okutur, K; Öztosun, B; Gülbagci, BB; Kalender, ME; Sahin, E; Seyyar, M; Özdemir, Ö; Selçukbiricik, F; Kanitez, M; Dede, I; Gümüs, M; Gökmen, E; Yaren, A; Menekse, S; Ebinç, S; Aksoy, S; Imamoglu, GI; Altinbas, M; Çetin, B; Uluç, BO; Er, Ö; Karadurmus, N; Erdogan, AP; Artaç, M; Tanriverdi, Ö; Çiçin, I; Sendur, MAN; Oktay, E; Bayoglu, IV; Paydas, S; Aydiner, A; Salim, DK; Geredeli, Ç; Yavuzsen, T; Dogan, M; Hacibekiroglu, I
    Background There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and >= 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0-14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9-6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8-7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6-6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5-8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5-4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-life data of the Turkish Oncology Group
    Gürbüz, M; Kutlu, Y; Akkus, E; Köksoy, EB; Köse, N; Öven, BB; Uluç, BO; Demiray, AG; Erdem, D; Demir, B; Turhal, NS; Üskent, N; Akbas, S; Selçukbiricik, F; Inal, A; Bilici, A; Ölmez, ÖF; Çabuk, D; Ünal, Ç; Hizal, M; Sendur, MAN; Korkmaz, M; Karadurmus, N; Ertürk, I; Göksu, SS; Tatli, AM; Güven, DC; Kiliçkap, S; Paksoy, N; Aydiner, A; Çinkir, HY; Özkul, Ö; Öztürk, A; Balli, S; Kemal, Y; Erdogan, AP; Er, Ö; Yumuk, PF; Demirkazik, A
    Purpose Atezolizumab has been shown to be effective and safe in randomized trial in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, there are limited real-life data on atezolizumab. In this study, we aimed to determine the real-life efficacy and safety of atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC. Methods This trial is a retrospective multicenter study of the Turkish Oncology Group, which included extensive-stage SCLC patients who received atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy in a first-line treatment. The characteristics of the patients, treatment and response rates, and PFS and OS are presented. Factors associated with PFS and OS were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results A total of 213 patients at the 30 oncology centers were included. The median number of chemotherapy cycle was 5 (1-8) and atezolizumab cycle was 7 (1-32). After median 11.9 months of follow-up, median PFS and OS was 6.8 months (95%CI 5.7-7.8), and 11.9 months (95%CI 11-12.7), respectively. The ORR was 61.9%. ECOG-PS (p = 0.002) and number of metastatic sites (p = 0.001) were associated with PFS and pack-year of smoking (p = 0.05), while ECOG-PS (p = 0.03) and number of metastatic sites (p = 0.001) were associated with OS. Hematological side effects were common and toxicities were manageable. Conclusion This real-life data confirm the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC.