Browsing by Author "Uz, D"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Efficacy of Epley Maneuver on Quality of Life of Elderly Patients with Subjective BPPV
    Uz, U; Uz, D; Akdal, G; Çelik, O
    OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the repositioning maneuver on quality of life in elderly patients with dizziness and/or vertigo. MATERIALS and METHODS:This controlled, prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted in elderly patients aged 65 years and above with a positive history of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), presence of vertigo, and no observable nystagmus during the Dix-Hallpike test, so-called Subjective BPPV (S-BPPV). Individuals were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) and dizziness handicap inventory (DHI). Groups were defined as treatment (treated with Epley maneuver bilaterally) or no treatment control (no treatment modality or canalith repositioning maneuver), Ten days after the first assessment, all patients were reassessed using VAS and DHI. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were randomized into two groups: 25 to the treatment group, and 25 to the control group. No significant differences were observed for baseline VAS and total DHI scores between the groups (p=0.636, p=0,846, respectively). On the other hand, after the reassessment, VAS and total DHI scores were both significantly reduced in the treatment group (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), but no reduction in either score was found in the control group (p=0.216, p=0.731, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study showed that elderly patients with S-BPPV benefit from the Epley maneuver, in particular global and disease-specific quality of life.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Does a smartphone application make it easier to evaluate the dizziness handicap inventory?
    Uz, U; Uz, D; Çelik, O
    Objective: The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a questionnaire that is frequently used for patients with vestibular system disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of the e-DHI smartphone application, which calculates DHI scores. Methods: Web-based iOS and Android smartphone applications (e-DHI) were developed to evaluate the DHI. After completing the questionnaire, the DHI total score and subscores (physical, functional and emotional) were assessed and results were noted and sent to the e-mail address. Twenty-five otorhinolaryngologists and neurologists were enrolled in the study to apply the DHI to the authors sequentially using the conventional assessment method and the e-DHI (randomized by priority). The questionnaire was applied by both methods, and for each method, the time required to complete the questionnaire, to calculate the DHI score, and the total time required were noted. Results: Three of the 25 doctors were excluded from the study due to a calculation error with the conventional evaluation method. The mean total time required for completing and scoring the questionnaire was shorter when the DHI was evaluated with the e-DHI application (160 +/- 32.2 seconds) compared with the classic assessment method (289 +/- 65.9 seconds) (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two methods in terms of the time taken to complete the questionnaire (p=0.269). However, the calculation periods were statistically significantly shorter with the digital application compared with the conventional method (p<0.001). Conclusion: The present study showed that the DHI could be applied more quickly, more comfortably, and safely (with higher accuracy) using the e-DHI smartphone application.