Browsing by Author "Uzun, O"
Now showing 1 - 15 of 15
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar and Similar Cold Metal Transfer Welded Galvanized Steel 1314 and Aluminum AA1050Irizalp, AO; Durmus, H; Yüksel, N; Türkmen, I; Uzun, OThis study aims to investigate the weldability of 1050 aluminum alloy (AA1050) and galvanized 1314 steel by the cold metal transfer (CMT) procedur, comparing it with respective welding of similar aluminum sheets. Mechanical properties of welded specimens were determined by tensile testing and hardness measurements. The study was completed by microstructural analysis. The results showed that CMT welding can be applied successfully to join aluminum and steel.Item Socioeconomic status has direct impact on asthma control: Turkish adult asthma registryArslan, B; Türk, M; Hayme, S; Aydin,Ö; Gokmen, D; Buhari, GK; Sozener, ZC; Gemicioglu, B; Bulut, I; Beyaz, S; Orcen, C; Ozdemir, SK; Keren, M; Damadoglu, E; Yakut, T; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Baccioglu, A; Yalim, SA; Yilmaz, I; Kalkan, IK; Niksarlioglu, EYO; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Erbay, M; Nayci, S; Tepetam, FM; Gelincik, AA; Dirol, H; Goksel, O; Karaoglanoglu, S; Erkekol, FO; Isik, SR; Yildiz, F; Yavuz, Y; Karadogan, D; Bozkurt, N; Seker, U; Oguzulgen, IK; Basyigit, I; Baris, SA; Ucar, EY; Erdogan, T; Polatli, M; Ediger, D; Gunaydin, FE; Pur, L; Katran, ZY; Sekibag, Y; Aykac, EF; Mungan, D; Gul, O; Cengiz, A; Akkurt, B; Ozden, S; Demir, S; Unal, D; Aslan, AF; Can, A; Gumusburun, R; Bogatekin, G; Akten, HS; Inan, S; Erdinc, M; Ogus, AC; Kavas, M; Yulug, DP; Cakmak, ME; Kaya, SB; Alpagat, G; Ozgur, ES; Uzun, O; Gulen, ST; Pekbak, G; Kizilirmak, D; Havlucu, Y; Donmez, H; Cetin, GP; Soyyigit, S; Kara, BY; Karakis, GP; Dursun, AB; Kendirlinan, R; Ozturk, AB; Sevinc, C; Simsek, GO; Abadoglu, O; Cerci, P; Yucel, T; Yorulmaz, I; Tezcaner, ZC; Tatar, EC; Suslu, AE; Ozer, S; Dursun, E; Yorgancioglu, A; Celik, GE; Uysal, MABackgroundAsthma is one of the most common causes of chronic respiratory disease, and countries with low socioeconomic status have both a high prevalence of asthma and asthma-related death.ObjectiveIn this study, we aimed to determine socioeconomic levels of asthmatic patients according to a national database and investigate the effects of social markers on disease control in our region.MethodsThis is an analysis of data from 2053 adult asthma patients from a multicentre chart study in Turkey. Socioeconomic status (SES) data were collected from questionnaires and this form was sent to the patients via e-mail. Parameters related to social status and poor disease control were analyzed.ResultsIlliteracy (OR:2.687 [95% CI: 1.235-5.848]; p = 0.013) and lower household income (OR:1,76 [95% CI: 1.002-3.09]; p = 0.049) were found as independent risk factors for hospitalization in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Therewithal, being aged between 40 and 60 (OR: 1.435 [95% CI: 1.074-1.917]; p = 0.015), illiteracy (OR: 2.188 [95% CI: 1.262-3.795]; p = 0.005) and being employed (OR: 1.466 [95% CI: 1.085-1.847]; p = 0.011) were considered as independent risk factors for systemic corticosteroid use at least 3 days within last 1 year.ConclusionAs a result of our national database, education level, household income and working status briefly socioeconomic status have impacts on asthma control. Identification of social markers in asthma and better recognition of risk factors based on the population gives us clues to provide better asthma control in the future.Item Picturing asthma in Turkey: results from the Turkish adult asthma registryCelik, GE; Aydin, O; Gokmen, D; Buhari, GK; Sozener, ZC; Gemicioglu, B; Bulut, I; Beyaz, S; Orcen, C; Ozdemir, SK; Keren, M; Damadoglu, E; Yakut, T; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Baccioglu, A; Yalim, SA; Yilmaz, I; Kalkan, IK; Uysal, MA; Niksarlioglu, EY; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Erbay, M; Nayci, S; Tepetam, FM; Gelincik, AA; Dirol, H; Goksel, O; Karaoglanoglu, S; Erkekol, FO; Isik, SR; Yildiz, F; Yavuz, Y; Karadogan, D; Bozkurt, N; Seker, U; Oguzulgen, IK; Basyigit, I; Baris, SA; Ucar, EY; Erdogan, T; Polatli, M; Ediger, D; Gunaydin, FE; Turk, M; Pur, L; Katran, ZY; Sekibag, Y; Aykac, EF; Mungan, D; Gul, O; Cengiz, A; Akkurt, B; Ozden, S; Demir, S; Unal, D; Aslan, AF; Can, A; Gumusburun, R; Bogatekin, G; Akten, HS; Inan, S; Erdinc, M; Ogus, AC; Kavas, M; Yulug, DP; Cakmak, ME; Kaya, SB; Alpagat, G; Ozgur, ES; Uzun, O; Gulen, ST; Pekbak, G; Kizilirmak, D; Havlucu, Y; Donmez, H; Arslan, B; Cetin, GP; Soyyigit, S; Kara, BY; Karakis, GP; Dursun, AB; Kendirlinan, R; Ozturk, AB; Sevinc, C; Simsek, GO; Abadoglu, O; Cerci, P; Yucel, T; Yorulmaz, I; Tezcaner, ZC; Tatar, EC; Suslu, AE; Ozer, S; Dursun, E; Yorgancioglu, AIntroductionNational data on asthma characteristics and the factors associated with uncontrolled asthma seem to be necessary for every country. For this purpose, we developed the Turkish Adult Asthma Registry for patients with asthma aiming to take a snapshot of our patients, thereby assigning the unmet needs and niche areas of intervention.MethodsCase entries were performed between March 2018 and March 2022. A web-based application was used to record data. Study outcomes were demographic features, disease characteristics, asthma control levels, and phenotypes.ResultsThe registry included 2053 patients from 36 study centers in Turkey. Female subjects dominated the group (n = 1535, 74.8%). The majority of the patients had allergic (n = 1158, 65.3%) and eosinophilic (n = 1174, 57.2%) asthma. Six hundred nineteen (32.2%) of the patients had obese asthma. Severe asthma existed in 670 (32.6%) patients. Majority of cases were on step 3-5 treatment (n: 1525; 88.1%). Uncontrolled asthma was associated with low educational level, severe asthma attacks in the last year, low FEV1, existence of chronic rhinosinusitis and living in particular regions.ConclusionThe picture of this registry showed a dominancy of middle-aged obese women with moderate-to-severe asthma. We also determined particular strategic targets such as low educational level, severe asthma attacks, low FEV1, and chronic rhinosinusitis to decrease uncontrolled asthma in our country. Moreover, some regional strategies may also be needed as uncontrolled asthma is higher in certain regions. We believe that these data will guide authorities to reestablish national asthma programs to improve asthma service delivery.Item Trends in prescribing montelukast in patients with asthma in real-life: Results from the Turkish adult asthma registryBeyaz, S; Erdinç, M; Hayme, S; Aslan, AF; Aydin,Ö; Gökmen, D; Buhari, GK; Sözener, ZC; Gemicioglu, B; Bulut, I; Örçen, C; Özdemir, SK; Keren, M; Damadoglu, E; Yakut, T; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Baccioglu, A; Yalim, SA; Yilmaz, I; Kalkan, IK; Uysal, MA; Niksarlioglu, EYÖ; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Erbay, M; Nayci, S; Tepetam, FM; Gelincik, AA; Dirol, H; Göksel,Ö; Karaoglanoglu, S; Erkekol, FÖ; Isik, SR; Yildiz, F; Yavuz, Y; Karadogan, D; Bozkurt, N; Seker,Ü; Oguzülgen, IK; Basyigit, I; Baris, SA; Uçar, EY; Erdogan, T; Polatli, M; Ediger, D; Günaydin, FE; Türk, M; Pür, L; Katran, ZY; Sekibag, Y; Aykaç, EF; Mungan, D; Gül,Ö; Cengiz, A; Akkurt, B; Özden, S; Demir, S; Ünal, D; Can, A; Guemuesburun, R; Bogatekin, G; Akten, HS; Inan, S; Ögüs, AC; Kavas, M; Yulug, DP; Çakmak, ME; Kaya, SB; Alpagat, G; Özgür, ES; Uzun, O; Gülen, ST; Pekbak, G; Kizilirmak, D; Havlucu, Y; Doenmez, H; Arslan, B; Çetin, GP; Soyyigit, S; Kara, BY; Karakis, GP; Dursun, AB; Kendirlinan, R; Öztürk, AB; Sevinç, C; Simsek, GÖ; Abadoglu,Ö; Çerçi, P; Yücel, T; Yorulmaz, I; Tezcaner, ZÇ; Tatar, EÇ; Süslü, AE; Özer, S; Dursun, E; Yorgancioglu, A; Çelik, GEMontelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) approved for the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis, is widely used, though real-world data on its application in asthma management remain limited. This registry-based study evaluated the use of montelukast in adult asthma patients, examining demographic and disease characteristics, asthma control status, asthma phenotypes, presence of atopy, and treatment regimens. Among 2053 patients analyzed, 61.76% (n = 1268; mean age: 46.2 +/- 14.3 years), predominantly females (similar to 76%), received montelukast. Montelukast users showed higher rates of allergic rhinitis (P < 0.001), hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (P = 0.008), and chronic rhinosinusitis (P = 0.008). Montelukast group also had higher atopy and total IgE levels and tended to be more eosinophilic. Montelukast was commonly preferred in allergic, eosinophilic, NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease, and severe asthma phenotypes (P < 0.001). Patients receiving Steps 4 and 5 treatments are more likely to be prescribed montelukast (P < 0.001). Montelukast usage was higher among patients with uncontrolled asthma [ACT< 20 (OR:1.29, 95%CI:1.052-1.582, P = 0.014)]. In addition, logistic regression analyses identified the main factors associated with increased montelukast use as; female gender (OR:1.33, 95%CI:1.041-1.713, P = 0.02), presence of atopy (OR:1.46, 95%CI:1.157-1.864, P = 0.002), comorbid allergic rhinitis (OR:2.12, 95%CI:1.679-2.293, P < 0.001), and severe asthma (OR:2.18, 95%CI:1.712-2.784, P < 0.001). These findings reveal that montelukast use is prevalent among asthma patients, particularly in females, middle-aged adults, and those with comorbid allergic rhinitis, uncontrolled asthma, or specific asthma phenotypes, underscoring the factors that influence its prescription in asthma management. (c) 2025 Codon Publications. Published by Codon Publications.Item Factors influencing the prescription of add-on long-acting muscarinic antagonists in real-world asthma management: Insights from a national registryGemicioglu, B; Gokmen, D; Can, A; Sevinc, C; Oguzulgen, IK; Soyyigit, S; Yakut, T; Havlucu, Y; Aydin, O; Buhari, GK; Sozener, ZC; Bulut, I; Beyaz, S; Orcen, C; Ozdemir, SK; Keren, M; Damadoglu, E; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Baccioglu, A; Yalim, SA; Yilmaz, I; Kalkan, IK; Uysal, MA; Niksarlioglu, EYO; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Erbay, M; Nayci, S; Tepetam, FM; Gelincik, A; Dirol, H; Goksel, O; Karaoglanoglu, S; Erkekol, FO; Isik, SR; Yildiz, F; Yavuz, Y; Karadogan, D; Bozkurt, N; Seker, U; Basyigit, I; Baris, SA; Ucar, EY; Erdogan, T; Polatli, M; Ediger, D; Gunaydin, FE; Turk, M; Pur, L; Katran, ZY; Sekibag, Y; Aykac, EF; Mungan, D; Gul, O; Cengiz, A; Akkurt, B; Ozden, S; Demir, S; Unal, D; Aslan, AF; Gumusburun, R; Bogatekin, G; Akten, HS; Inan, S; Erdinc, M; Ogus, AC; Kavas, M; Yulug, DP; Cakmak, ME; Kaya, SB; Alpagat, G; Ozgur, ES; Uzun, O; Gulen, ST; Pekbak, G; Kizilirmak, D; Donmez, H; Arslan, B; Cetin, GP; Kara, BY; Dursun, AB; Karakis, GP; Kendirlinan, R; Ozturk, AB; Simsek, GO; Abadoglu, O; Cerci, P; Yucel, T; Yorulmaz, I; Tezcaner, ZC; Tatar, EC; Suslu, AE; Ozer, S; Dursun, E; Yorgancioglu, A; Çelik, GECurrent guidelines recommend adding long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) in patients with uncontrolled asthma, despite the use of moderate to high doses of inhaled steroid-long-acting beta agonists (ICS/LABA). This study aims to analyze the factors related to the prescription of add-on LAMA in clinical practice for asthma patients, shedding light on physicians' preferences. This study included adult asthma patients on add-on LAMA and ICS/LABA monitored for at least one year in a national registry comprising 2053 asthmatics. Patients' characteristics and disease profiles were analyzed to identify factors associated with the prescription of add-on LAMA across the entire cohort. A comparative analysis was performed among three groups: MART (ICS/formoterol as a maintenance and reliever therapy) plus LAMA, Conventional (ICS/LABA as a maintenance and short-acting beta agonist as reliever) plus LAMA and Triple (ICS/ LABA/LAMA single inhaler). LAMAs were added to ICS/LABA in 11.7 % of patients in the national registry. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age, low FEV1 (%), Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores less than 20, and severe exacerbation were the main factors influencing the initiation of LAMA in our registry. However, demographic characteristics of asthma, control status, pulmonary function test results were similar among the three groups of LAMA users (p > 0.05). Physicians used LAMAs without phenotyping based on allergic status or eosinophil levels (p > 0.05). Mepolizumab was added after LAMA in all patients, while omalizumab was initiated before LAMA in 16.9 % of the patients receiving LAMA along with biologics. Add-on LAMAs were predominantly prescribed for older, uncontrolled, and exacerbated asthma patients with low FEV1.Item Extrapulmonary involvement in patients with sarcoidosis in TurkeyOkumus, G; Musellim, B; Cetinkaya, E; Turker, H; Uzaslan, E; Yenturk, E; Uzun, O; Saglam, L; Kumbasar, OO; Celik, G; Annakkaya, AN; Altiay, G; Tabak, L; Sakar, A; Kiter, G; Erturan, S; Turktas, H; Yalniz, E; Akkoclu, A; Ogus, C; Dogan, OT; Ozkan, M; Aktogu, S; Uzel, I; Ongen, GBackground and objective: Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is common, and is almost always associated with concomitant thoracic involvement. Extrapulmonary manifestations vary on the basis of gender, age at presentation and ethnicity. The aim of this study was to investigate extrapulmonary involvement in patients with sarcoidosis in Turkey. Methods: This study was conducted by Turkish Thoracic Society Clinical Problems Study Group. New cases of sarcoidosis between 1 June 2004 and 31 May 2006 were recorded on electronic case record forms sent to all potential investigators and information about extrapulmonary involvement was collected. Results: One hundred and nineteen of 293 patients (83 female, 36 male, mean age = 45 +/- 12 years) had extrapulmonary involvement in this study (40.6%). The median time to diagnosis was 6 months and this was longer than patients with just thoracic sarcoidosis (P = 0.001). Extrapulmonary symptoms were present in 181 (61.8%) patients, and skin lesions, arthralgia and back pain were the commonest (33.4%, 20.8% and 16.4%, respectively). Incidence of organ involvement was independent of age with the exception of ocular involvement, which was higher in those under the age of 40 years (P = 0.007). Conclusions: Skin and peripheral lymph node involvement were the most common sites of extrapulmonary involvement and ocular involvement was more common in those under the age of 40 years in patients with sarcoidosis in a Turkish population.Item Clinical presentations and diagnostic work-up in sarcoidosis: a series of Turkish cases (clinics and diagnosis of sarcoidosis)Kiter, G; Müsellim, B; Çetinkaya, E; Türker, H; Uzaslan, AEK; Yentürk, E; Uzun, O; Saglam, L; Kumbasar, ÖÖ; Çelik, G; Okumus, G; Arbak, PM; Altiay, G; Tabak, L; Coskun, AS; Erturan, S; Türktas, H; Yalniz, E; Akkoçlu, A; Ögüs, C; Dogan, ÖT; Özkan, M; Özkan, S; Uzel, FI; Öngen, GSarcoidosis is an idiopathic granulomatous disease. It usually affects the lung. The diagnosis may be problematic since the known causes of granulomatous inflammation must be excluded. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentations and diagnostic approaches of sarcoidosis. The study protocol was sent yia internet, and the participants were asked to send the information (clinical, radiological and diagnostic) on newly diagnosed sarcoidosis cases. 293 patients were enrolled within two years. Pulmonary symptoms were found in 73.3% of the patients, and cough was the most common one (53.2%), followed by dyspnea (40.3%). Constitutional symptoms were occured in half of the patients. The most common one was fatigue (38.6%). The most common physical sign was eritema nodosum (17.1 %). The most common chest radiograhical sign was bilateral Mar lymphadenomegaly (78.8%). Staging according to chest X-ray has revealed that most of the patients were in Stage land Stage (51.9% and 31.7%, respectively). Sarcoidosis was confirmed histopathologically in 265 (90.4%) patients. Although one-third of the bronch.oscopy was revealed normal, mucosa(hyperemi (19.8%) and external compression of the bronchial wall (16.8%) were common abnormal findings. The 100% success rate was obtained in mediastinoscopy among the frequently used sampling methods. Transbronchial biopsy was the most frequently used method with 48.8% success rate. Considering sarcoidosis with its most common and also rare findings in the differential diagnosis, organizing the related procedures according to the possibly effected areas, and the expertise of the team would favour multimodality diagnosis.Item Epidemiological features of Turkish patients with sarcoidosisMusellim, B; Kumbasar, OO; Ongen, G; Cetinkaya, E; Turker, H; Uzaslan, E; Yenturk, E; Uzun, O; Saglam, L; Celik, G; Okumus, G; Annakkaya, AN; Altiay, G; Tabak, L; Sakar, A; Kiter, G; Erturan, S; Turktas, H; Yalniz, E; Akkoclu, A; Ogus, C; Dogan, OT; Ozkan, M; Aktogu, S; Uzel, IEpidemiological characteristics of sarcoidosis differ according to geographical distribution. The aim of our study was to disclose epidemiological characteristics in our country. The data was collected from investigators, who sent information on newly-diagnosed patients via internet. In 2 years 198 female and 95 mate patients were enrolled to the study (f/m:2.08). Mean age of patients was 44 +/- 13 years (17-90). Mean age of mate patients was 38 12 while mean age of female patients was 48 13 (p < 0.001). 73.4% of patients were nonsmokers (85.4% of females; 48.4% of mates; (p < 0.001)). About 50% of our 293 patients were housewives. Familial sarcoidosis was found in 3 patients' first degree relatives. Estimated annual incidence of sarcoidosis for Turkey was calculated as 4 per 100,000 person. According to our study, 2/3 of sarcoidosis patients were women; mean age of patients was 45 and the disease began 10 years later in female patients. 80% of patients were nonsmokers; negative relation between sarcoidosis and smoking was evident especially in women. Familial sarcoidosis frequency was lower compared to other studies in the literature. There was no occupational exposure history in our patients. Our incidence rate, is similar with the results of other European studies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Item The predictors of COVID-19 mortality in a nationwide cohort of Turkish patientsKokturk, N; Babayigit, C; Kul, S; Cetinkaya, PD; Nayci, SA; Baris, SA; Karcioglu, O; Aysert, P; Irmak, I; Yuksel, AA; Sekibag, Y; Toprak, OB; Azak, E; Mulamahmutoglu, S; Cuhadaroglu, C; Demirel, A; Kerget, B; Ketencioglu, BB; Ozger, HS; Ozkan, G; Yuce, ZT; Ergan, B; Oguz, VA; Kilinc, O; Ercelik, M; Ciftci, TU; Alici, O; Temel, EN; Ataoglu, O; Aydin, A; Bahcetepe, DC; Gullu, YT; Fakili, F; Deveci, F; Kose, N; Tor, MM; Gunluoglu, G; Altin, S; Turgut, T; Tuna, T; Ozturk, O; Dikensoy, O; Gulhan, PY; Basyigit, I; Boyaci, H; Oguzulgen, IK; Borekci, S; Gemicioglu, B; Bayraktar, F; Elbek, O; Hanta, I; Okur, HK; Sagcan, G; Uzun, O; Akgun, M; Altinisik, G; Dursun, B; Edis, EC; Gulhan, E; Eyuboglu, FO; Gultekin, O; Havlucu, Y; Ozkan, M; Sakar, A; Sayiner, A; Kalyoncu, AF; Itil, O; Bayram, HItem What should be the appropriate minimal duration for patient examination and evaluation in pulmonary outpatient clinics?Musellim, B; Borekci, S; Uzan, G; Sak, ZHA; Ozdemir, SK; Altinisik, G; Altunbey, SA; Sen, N; Kilinc, O; Yorgancioglu, A; Yilmaz, N; Ulasli, SS; Salepci, B; Ocakli, B; Sokullu, ZGE; Uzun, O; Kurtulus, S; Uslu, S; Saritas, E; Genc, S; Annakkaya, AN; Aydin, O; Bilgin, C; Turk, M; Ozmen, I; Tasbakan, MS; Halis, AN; Bahcecioglu, SN; Dabak, G; Isik, SR; Ozturk, AB; Akgun, M; Pihtili, A; Ozkan, G; Balbay, EG; Okumus, G; Onen, ZP; Yasayancan, N; Uysal, FE; Hanta, I; Kaya, Z; Turker, H; Berkesoglu, C; Celik, P; Cetinkaya, PD; Gundogus, B; Ongen, G; Tuncay, E; Erboy, FINTRODUCTION: Patient examinations performed in a limited time period may lead to impairment in patient and physician relationship, defective and erroneous diagnosis, inappropriate prescriptions, less common use of preventive medicine practices, poor patient satisfaction, and increased violent acts against health-care staff. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the appropriate minimal duration of patient examination in the pulmonary practice. METHODS: A total of 49 researchers from ten different study groups of the Turkish Thoracic Society participated in the study. The researchers were asked to examine patients in an almost ideal manner, without time constraint under available conditions. RESULTS: A total of 1680 patient examinations were reviewed. The mean duration of patient examination in ideal conditions was determined to be 20.4 +/- 9.6 min. Among all steps of patient examination, the longest time was spent for taking medical history. The total time spent for patient examination was statistically significantly longer in the university hospitals than in the governmental hospitals and training and research hospitals (P < 0.001). Among different patient categories, the patients with a chronic disorder presenting for the first time and were referred from primary or secondary to tertiary care for further evaluation have required the longest time for patient examination. CONCLUSION: According to our study, the appropriate minimal duration for patient examination is 20 min. It has been observed that in university hospitals and in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases, this duration has been increased to above 25 min. The durations in clinical practice should be planned accordingly.Item The predictors of COVID-19 mortality in a nationwide cohort of Turkish patientsKokturk, N; Babayigit, C; Kul, S; Cetinkaya, PD; Nayci, SA; Baris, SA; Karcioglu, O; Aysert, P; Irmak, I; Yuksel, AA; Sekibag, Y; Toprak, OB; Azak, E; Mulamahmutoglu, S; Cuhadaroglu, C; Demirel, A; Kerget, B; Ketencioglu, BB; Ozger, HS; Ozkan, G; Ture, Z; Ergan, B; Oguz, VA; Kilinc, O; Ercelik, M; Ciftci, TU; Alici, O; Temel, EN; Ataoglu, O; Aydin, A; Bahcetepe, DC; Gullu, YT; Fakili, F; Deveci, F; Kose, N; Tor, MM; Gunluoglu, G; Altin, S; Turgut, T; Tuna, T; Ozturk, O; Dikensoy, O; Gulhan, PY; Basyigit, I; Boyaci, H; Oguzulgen, IK; Borekci, S; Gemicioglu, B; Bayraktar, F; Elbek, O; Hanta, I; Okur, HK; Sagcan, G; Uzun, O; Akgun, M; Altinisik, G; Dursun, B; Edis, EC; Gulhan, E; Eyuboglu, FO; Gultekin, O; Havlucu, Y; Ozkan, M; Coskun, AS; Sayiner, A; Kalyoncu, AF; Itil, O; Bayram, HThe COVID-19-related death rate varies between countries and is affected by various risk factors. This multi-center registry study was designed to evaluate the mortality rate and the related risk factors in Turkey. We retrospectively evaluated 1500 adults with COVID-19 from 26 centers who were hospitalized between March 11 and July 31, 2020. In the study group, 1041 and 459 cases were diagnosed as definite and highly probable cases, respectively. There were 993 PCR-positive cases (66.2%). Among all cases, 1144 (76.3%) were diagnosed with non-severe pneumonia, whereas 212 (14.1%) had severe pneumonia. Death occurred in 67 patients, corresponding to a mortality rate of 4.5% (95% CI:3.5-5.6). The univariate analysis demonstrated that various factors, including male sex, age >= 65 years and the presence of dyspnea or confusion, malignity, chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung disease, immunosuppressive conditions, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, and sepsis, were positively associated with mortality. Favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were not associated with survival. Following multivariate analysis, male sex, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, malignancy, sepsis and interstitial lung diseases were found to be independent risk factors for mortality. Among the biomarkers, procalcitonin levels on the 3rd-5th days of admission showed the strongest associations with mortality (OR: 6.18; 1.6-23.93). This study demonstrated that the mortality rate in hospitalized patients in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic was a serious threat and that those patients with male sex, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, malignancy, sepsis and interstitial lung diseases were at increased risk of mortality; therefore, such patients should be closely monitored.Item COVID-19: booster(s) vs. hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit admissionToprak, OB; Akpolat, T; Uzun, O; Deniz, PP; Kokturk, N; Varol, A; Guzel, E; Ercelik, M; Gultekin, O; Guner, R; Turan, S; Bekta, SG; Coskun, N; Bakan, N; Yakar, MN; Kutsoylu, OE; Ergan, B; Baris, SA; Basyigit, I; Boyaci, H; Cetinkaya, F; Colak, H; Aykac, N; Ketencioglu, BB; Yüce, ZT; Isik, SA; Yilmaz, ES; Karaoglanoglu, S; Safgi, SB; Ozkan, G; Kose, N; Kizilirmak, D; Havlucu, Y; Nural, S; Kerget, F; Sunal, O; Yuksel, A; Dursun, ZB; Deveci, F; Kuluozturk, M; Ataoglu, O; Dursun, M; Keskin, S; Sezgin, ME; Sezgin, ENA; Eser, F; Akyildiz, L; Almaz, MS; Kayaaslan, B; Hasanoglu, I; Bayrak, M; Gümüs, A; Sagcan, G; Cuhadaroglu, C; Kucuk, H; Onyilmaz, T; Mete, B; Kilinc, O; Itil, BOOBJECTIVE: As the pandem-ic continues, different vaccine protocols have been implemented to maintain the protection of vaccines and to provide protection against new variants. The aim of this study was to as-sess hospitalized patients' vaccination status and document the efficacy of boosters.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients that were hospitalized due to COVID-19 were enrolled from 28 hospitals in Turkey for five months from September 2021. 5,331 confirmed COVID-19 pa-tients from collaborating centers were random-ly enrolled to understand/estimate the distri-bution of vaccination status in hospitalized pa-tients and to compare the efficacy of vaccina-tion/booster protocols.RESULTS: 2,779 men and 2,552 women of which 2,408 (45.2%) were admitted to Intensive Care Units participated in this study. It was found that the highest risk reduction for all age groups was found in groups that received 4 doses. Four doses of vaccination for every 3.7 people under 50 years of age, for every 5.7 people in the 50-64 age group, and for every 4.3 people over 65 years of age will prevent 1 patient from being admitted to intensive care. Regardless of the type of vaccine, it was found that the risk of ICU hospitalization decreased in those who were vaccinated compared to those who were not vaccinated. Regardless of the type of vaccine, the ICU risk was found to decrease 1.25-fold in those who received 1 or 2 doses of vaccine, 1.18-fold in those who received 3 dos-es, and 3.26-fold in those who received 4 doses.CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that the addition of a fourth dose is more effective in preventing intensive unit care even in disad-vantaged.Item The association of antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity: The retrospective analysis of a nationwide COVID-19 cohortBabayigit, C; Kokturk, N; Kul, S; Cetinkaya, PD; Nayci, SA; Baris, SA; Karcioglu, O; Aysert, P; Irmak, I; Yuksel, AA; Sekibag, Y; Toprak, OB; Azak, E; Mulamahmutoglu, S; Cuhadaroglu, C; Demirel, A; Kerget, B; Ketencioglu, BB; Ozger, HS; Ozkan, G; Ture, Z; Ergan, B; Oguz, VA; Kilinc, O; Ercelik, M; Ciftci, TU; Alici, O; Temel, EN; Ataoglu, O; Aydin, A; Bahcetepe, DC; Gullu, YT; Fakili, F; Deveci, F; Kose, N; Tor, MM; Gunluoglu, G; Altin, S; Turgut, T; Tuna, T; Ozturk, O; Dikensoy, O; Gulhan, PY; Basyigit, I; Boyaci, H; Oguzulgen, IK; Borekci, S; Gemicioglu, B; Bayraktar, F; Elbek, O; Hanta, I; Okur, HK; Sagcan, G; Uzun, O; Akgun, M; Altinisik, G; Dursun, B; Edis, EC; Gulhan, E; Eyuboglu, FO; Gultekin, O; Havlucu, Y; Ozkan, M; Coskun, A; Sayiner, A; Kalyoncu, AF; Itil, O; Bayram, HBackground and objectivesAlthough several repurposed antiviral drugs have been used for the treatment of COVID-19, only a few such as remdesivir and molnupiravir have shown promising effects. The objectives of our study were to investigate the association of repurposed antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity. MethodsPatients admitted to 26 different hospitals located in 16 different provinces between March 11-July 18, 2020, were enrolled. Case definition was based on WHO criteria. Patients were managed according to the guidelines by Scientific Board of Ministry of Health of Turkey. Primary outcomes were length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and intubation. ResultsWe retrospectively evaluated 1,472 COVID-19 adult patients; 57.1% were men (mean age = 51.9 +/- 17.7years). A total of 210 (14.3%) had severe pneumonia, 115 (7.8%) were admitted to ICUs, and 69 (4.7%) were intubated during hospitalization. The median (interquartile range) of duration of hospitalization, including ICU admission, was 7 (5-12) days. Favipiravir (n = 328), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 55), and oseltamivir (n = 761) were administered as antiviral agents, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, n = 1,382) and azithromycin (n = 738) were used for their immunomodulatory activity. Lopinavir/ritonavir (beta [95% CI]: 4.71 [2.31-7.11]; p = 0.001), favipiravir (beta [95% CI]: 3.55 [2.56-4.55]; p = 0.001) and HCQ (beta [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.02-1.67]; p = 0.046) were associated with increased risk of lengthy hospital stays. Furthermore, favipiravir was associated with increased risks of ICU admission (OR [95% CI]: 3.02 [1.70-5.35]; p = 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (OR [95% CI]: 2.94 [1.28-6.75]; p = 0.011). ConclusionOur findings demonstrated that antiviral drugs including lopinavir, ritonavir, and favipiravir were associated with negative clinical outcomes such as increased risks for lengthy hospital stay, ICU admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. Therefore, repurposing such agents without proven clinical evidence might not be the best approach for COVID-19 treatment.Item COVID-19: vaccination vs. hospitalizationUzun, O; Akpolat, T; Varol, A; Turan, S; Bektas, SG; Cetinkaya, PD; Dursun, M; Bakan, N; Ketencioglu, BB; Bayrak, M; Baris, SA; Guner, R; Gunal, O; Nural, S; Deniz, PP; Toprak, OB; Ozkan, G; Gumus, A; Kerget, F; Ercelik, M; Ataoglu, O; Yuksel, A; Ates, G; Kutsoylu, OE; Kose, N; Kizilirmak, D; Keskin, S; Gultekin, O; Coskun, N; Yilmaz, ES; Uslu, S; Basyigit, I; Ergan, B; Deveci, F; Yakar, MN; Zuhur, C; Sagcan, G; Yuce, ZT; Kuluozturk, M; Sezgin, ME; Sezgin, ENA; Havlucu, Y; Cuhadaroglu, C; Kilinc, O; Boyaci, H; Altunay, H; Akti, M; Dursun, ZB; Kalem, AK; Isik, SA; Akyildiz, L; Aykac, N; Almaz, MS; Kokturk, N; Itil, OObjective Vaccination is the most efficient way to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but vaccination rates remain below the target level in most countries. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the vaccination status of hospitalized patients and compare two different booster vaccine protocols. Setting Inoculation in Turkey began in mid-January 2021. Sinovac was the only available vaccine until April 2021, when BioNTech was added. At the beginning of July 2021, the government offered a third booster dose to healthcare workers and people aged > 50 years who had received the two doses of Sinovac. Of the participants who received a booster, most chose BioNTech as the third dose. Methods We collected data from 25 hospitals in 16 cities. Patients hospitalized between August 1 and 10, 2021, were included and categorized into eight groups according to their vaccination status. Results We identified 1401 patients, of which 529 (37.7%) were admitted to intensive care units. Nearly half (47.8%) of the patients were not vaccinated, and those with two doses of Sinovac formed the second largest group (32.9%). Hospitalizations were lower in the group which received 2 doses of Sinovac and a booster dose of BioNTech than in the group which received 3 doses of Sinovac. Conclusion Effective vaccinations decreased COVID-19-related hospitalizations. The efficacy after two doses of Sinovac may decrease over time; however, it may be enhanced by adding a booster dose. Moreover, unvaccinated patients may be persuaded to undergo vaccination.Item Asthma patients with obesity have a unique phenotype: a subanalysis of the Turkish adult asthma registryCelebi Sozener, Z; Oguzulgen, IK; Ozalp Ates, FS; Baccioglu, A; Argun Baris, S; Ediger, D; Gunaydin, FE; Sevinc, C; Seker, U; Yilmaz Kara, B; Beyaz, S; Mungan, D; Aydin, O; Gokmen, D; Buhari, GK; Gemicioglu, B; Bulut, I; Orcen, C; Kepil Ozdemir, S; Keren, M; Damadoglu, E; Yakut, T; Kalpaklioglu, AF; Alan Yalim, S; Yilmaz, I; Koca Kalkan, I; Uysal, MA; Ozgun Niksarlioglu, EY; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Erbay, M; Nayci, S; Tepetam, FM; Akkor Gelincik, A; Dirol, H; Goksel, O; Karaoglanoglu, S; Oner Erkekol, F; Isik, SR; Yildiz, F; Yavuz, Y; Karadogan, D; Bozkurt, N; Basyigit, I; Yilmazel Ucar, E; Erdogan, T; Polatli, M; Turk, M; Pur, L; Yegin Katran, Z; Sekibag, Y; Aykac, EF; Gul, O; Cengiz, A; Akkurt, B; Ozden, S; Demir, S; Unal, D; Aslan, AF; Can, A; Gumusburun, R; Bogatekin, G; Akten, HS; Inan, S; Erdinc, M; Ogus, AC; Kavas, M; Polat Yulug, D; Cakmak, ME; Kaya, SB; Alpagat, G; Ozgur, ES; Uzun, O; Gulen, ST; Pekbak, G; Kizilirmak, D; Havlucu, Y; Donmez, H; Arslan, B; Cetin, GP; Soyyigit, S; Pasaoglu Karakis, G; Dursun, AB; Kendirlinan, R; Ozturk, AB; Omeroglu Simsek, G; Abadoglu, O; Cerci, P; Yucel, T; Yorulmaz, I; Tezcaner, ZC; Cadalli Tatar, E; Suslu, AE; Ozer, S; Dursun, E; Yorgancioglu, A; Celik, GEObjective: The obese-asthma phenotype has gradually increased in the last few years. We aimed to assess the differences between obese and non-obese patients with asthma. Methods: This research is a subanalysis of the Turkish Adult Asthma Registry (TAAR). Clinical presentation, disease control, severity, and demographics of obese and non-obese (normal-weight, overweight) patients were compared. Results: The obesity rate in TAAR was 32.2% (n=619/1919; 18-83years; 527F/92 M). Patients with asthma and obesity had higher rates of childhood obesity, longer symptom duration, later onset of asthma, and more severe asthma. These patients were more likely to be female, older, less educated, and live in rural areas. Patients with obesity had more scheduled visits and emergency visits compared with non-obese patients, but similar asthma control, oral corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and unscheduled visits. They also had a higher frequency of T2-high but lower frequency of possible T2-low phenotypes compared with normal-weight asthmatics. The risk of severe asthma in patients with obesity was 6.04 times higher for allergic than non-allergic patients and 3.58 times higher for the T2-high phenotype than for possible T2-low phenotypes. A one-unit increase in the asthma control test reduced the risk of severe asthma by 22%. Conclusions: A good definition of this phenotype is important to ensure that appropriate treatment strategies are implemented to achieve the control goal. We also believe that prevention of childhood obesity is an effective and pivotal strategy to achieve the goal of asthma control.