Browsing by Subject "Anesthetics, Local"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Perioperative use of corticosteroid and bupivacaine combination in lumbar disc surgery: A randomized controlled trial(2002) Mirzai H.; Tekin I.; Alincak H.Study Design. A prospective and controlled study of perioperative use of combined local anesthetic and corticosteroid in lumbar disc surgery. Summary of Background Data. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of corticosteroids is considered to be caused by the inhibition of phospholipase A2, which plays an important role in the pain mechanism of lumbar disc problems. Although some authors have demonstrated that the use of intramuscular bupivacaine during lumbar discectomy resulted in a marked reduction of postoperative back pain, others have reported that the key intervention was probably the administration of epidural corticosteroid. The coadministration of these two drugs in lumbar disc surgery for the relief of postoperative back pain has yet not been studied adequately. Objectives. Assessment of the combined use of perioperative corticosteroids and bupivacaine for the relief of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery. Methods. Forty-four selected patients had acute-onset single-level unilateral herniated nucleus pulposus that were refractory to conservative management. All patients underwent lumbar disc surgery under standard general anesthesia. Before surgical incision, the skin and subcutaneous tissues were infiltrated with 10 mL of 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline to produce local vasoconstriction. During wound closure, 20 mL 0.9% saline in Group 1 (n = 22) and 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine in Group 2 (n = 22) were injected into the paravertebral muscles and subcutaneus tissues. In addition, a piece of autologous fat taken from the wound was first soaked in 40 mg of methylprednisolone for 10 minutes, then placed over the exposed nerve root, and the remaining steroid was flushed into the wound in Group 2. The wound was closed after drug administration in both groups. In the postoperative period, all patients received 100 mg of meperidine intramuscularly when needed and were allowed to receive a second dose at least 4 hours later than the first dose for postoperative analgesia. Postoperative back pain intensity, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were assessed 1, 3, 6, and 12 hours after the conclusion of surgery. Results. Visual analog scale pain scores for the postoperative recordings were lower in Group 2 than in Group 1, but these findings were not statistically significant. Patients in Group 1 received 77.3 ± 48.8 mg meperidine, and those in Group 2 received 31.8 ± 45.5 mg meperidine, for pain medication in the first 12 hours (P < 0.05). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were not significantly different between the two groups in all recording periods. Conclusion. It is concluded that the perioperative use of bupivacaine and corticosteroids during lumbar discectomy maintains effective postoperative analgesia and decreases opioid usage without complications.Item Hearing loss does not occur in young patients undergoing spinal anesthesia(2004) Ok G.; Tok D.; Erbuyun K.; Aslan A.; Tekin I.Although uncommon, hearing loss after spinal anesthesia has been described. Vestibulocochlear dysfunction after spinal anesthesia in which 22-gauge and 25-gauge Quincke needles were used was investigated to determine if needle size affected hearing. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, aged 20 to 40 years, who were undergoing lower extremity surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into 2 groups. After intravenous hydration, 3 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine was administered for spinal anesthesia, which was performed with a 22-gauge Quincke needle in group I (n = 30) patients and a 25-gauge Quincke needle in group II (n = 30) patients. Before surgery and 2 days after surgery, pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry were performed. Preoperative and postoperative hearing data were obtained in the right and left ears for every frequency. Headache, nausea, and vomiting and cranial nerve III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII function were assessed on postoperative day 2. Demographic data were not different between the groups. No hypoacousis was noted at any frequency during the entire testing period in either group. Two patients from group I experienced postdural puncture headache on postoperative day 3, and neither had hearing loss. No patient had cranial nerve dysfunction. We were unable to induce hearing loss in young patients undergoing spinal anesthesia by injecting the anesthetic with a 22-gauge or a 25-gauge Quincke needle.Item Effectiveness of clonidine and fentanyl addition to bupivacaine in postoperative patient controlled epidural analgesia; [Wirksamkeit von clonidin und fentanyl als zusatz bei der postoperativen patientenkontrollierten epiduralanalgesie mit bupivacain](2005) Topcu I.; Luleci N.; Tekin S.; Kefi A.; Erincler T.Background and Objectives: The aim of this prospective randomized double-blinded study was to compare the analgesic and side-effects of bupivacaine in combination with clonidine or fentanyl during patient-controlled-epidural analgesia (PCEA) in the postoperative period after abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: 75 patients from 18 to 65 years of age with ASA status I - II were investigated. After preoperative epidural catheterization, the patients were operated in general anesthesia. After surgery, the patients were randomly allocated to 3 PCEA-groups: Group B 0.125% bupivacaine, Group F 0.125% bupivacaine plus 1 μg × ml-1 fentanyl, Group C 0.125% bupivacaine plus 0.75 μg × ml-1 clonidine (10 ml loading dose, 5 ml repetitive bolus dose, 10 min lockout time, 30 ml limit within 4h). During the following 24 hours, hemodynamic parameters, pain score using visual analog scale (VAS), total analgesic consumption, additional analgesic requirements, sedation, satisfaction, nausea scores and probable side-effects were evaluated. Results: Total analgesic consumption was not different between Group F and Group C, but lower than in Group B (p < 0.05). Additional analgesic use was not different between the groups. Group F and Group C had lower VAS-scores in 24 hours than Group B (p < 0.05). Hemodynamic and sedation scores of patients were not different. In Group C, incidence of nausea was lower and satisfaction of patients was higher (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anesthetics for PCEA can reduce the analgetic demand. Epidural clonidine can reduce postoperative nausea and is connected with higher patients' satisfaction. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.Item Comparison of analgesic activity of the addition to neostigmine and fentanyl to bupivacaine in postoperative epidural analgesia(2006) Tekin S.; Topcu I.; Ekici N.Z.; Caglar H.; Erincler T.Objectives: To compare the analgesic and side effects of bupivacaine in combinations with neostigmine and fentanyl using patient-controlled-epidural analgesia (PCEA) methods in the postoperative period after abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: Seventy-five adult American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients, aged 18-65 years were included in the study. The study took place in Celal Bayar University Hospital, Turkey between 2003-2004 years. After preoperative epidural catheterization, the patients were operated under general anesthesia. After surgery, the patients were randomly allocated in a double-blinded manner to receive PCEA and divided into 3 groups: Group B: 0.125% bupivacaine, Group N: 0.125% bupivacaine plus neostigmine 4 μg kg-1 and Group F: 0.125% bupivacaine plus 1 μg kg-1 fentanyl solutions (10 mL loading dose, 5 mL bolus dose, 10 min lockout time, 30 mL in 4 hour limit). During the following 24 hours, hemodynamic parameters, pain score using visual analog scale, total analgesic consumption, additional analgesic requirements, sedation, satisfaction, nausea scores and probable side-effects were evaluated. Results: Total analgesic consumption was 143.7 ± 7.2 mL in Group B, 123.4 ± 6.2 mL in Group N and 106 ± 8.3 mL in Groups F. The mean value in Group F was significantly lower than Group N and Group B (p<0.05), and was lower in Group N than Group B. Visual analog scale scores were lower in Group F than other groups (p<0.05). There were no differences in side effects between all groups. Conclusions: Fentanyl and neostigmine by the PCEA method can be used safely for postoperative analgesia after gynecologic surgery. They increase analgesia quality and satisfaction without an increase in side effects.Item Comparison of clinical effectiveness of thoracic epidural and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the treatment of rib fractures pain in intensive care unit; [Toraks travmali hastalarda intravenöz hasta kontrollü analjezi ile torakal epidural hasta kontrollü analjezinin klinik etkinliǧinin karşilaştirilmasi](2007) Topçu I.; Ekici Z.; Sakarya M.BACKGROUND: The results of thoracic epidural and systemic patient controlled analgesia practice were evaluated retrospectively in patients with thoracic trauma. METHODS: Patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit between 1997 and 2003, with a diagnosis of multiple rib fractures related to thoracic trauma were evaluated retrospectively. Data were recorded from 49 patients who met the following criteria; three or more rib fractures, initiation of PCA with I.V. phentanyl or thoracic epidural analgesia with phentanyl and bupivacaine. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups concerning injury severity score. APACHE II score (8.1±1.6 and 9.2±1.7) and the number of rib fractures (4±1.1 and 6.8±2.7) were higher in thoracic epidural analgesia group (p<0.05). Pain scores of patients who received thoracic epidural analgesia were significantly lower as from 6th hour during whole therapy (p<0.05). Length of intensive care unit stay (15.6±5.9 and 12.1±4.4 day) was found to be shorter in thoracic epidural analgesia group (p<0.05). There were no differences between the groups regarding mechanical ventilation requirement, pulmonary and cardiac complications. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the use of thoracic epidural analgesia with infusion of local anesthetics and opioids are more appropriate as they provide more effective analgesia and shorten length of intensive care unit stay in chest trauma patients with more than three rib fractures who require intensive care.Item Item Evaluation of injection techniques in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: A prospective randomized clinical trial(2012) Okçu G.; Erkan S.; Entürk M.; Özalp R.T.; Yercan H.S.Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of two different injection techniques of local corticosteroid and local anesthetic in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Methods: This prospective study followed 80 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis at our hospital outpatient clinic between 2005 and 2006. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group 1 received a single injection of 1 ml betamethasone and 1 ml prilocaine on the lateral epicondyle at the point of maximum tenderness. Group 2 patients received an injection of the same drug mixture. Following the initial injection, the needle tip was redirected and reinserted down the bone approximately 30 to 40 times without emerging from the skin, creating a hematoma. Patients were evaluated with the Turkish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire before injection and at the final follow-up. The unpaired t-test and chi-square tests were used to compare results. Results: Sixteen patients in Group 1 and 15 patients in Group 2 were lost during follow-up. The average follow-up period of the remaining 49 patients was 21.6 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gender, age, follow-up period, symptom duration, involvement side and number of dominant limbs. The Turkish DASH scores of Group 2 were significantly lower than those of Group 1 (p=0.017). Conclusion: Long-term clinical success in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis depends on the injection method. The peppering technique appears to be more effective than the single injection technique in the long-term. © 2012 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.Item Neurotoxic effects of local anesthetics on the mouse neuroblastoma NB2a cell line(Informa Healthcare, 2015) Mete M.; Aydemir I.; Tuglu I.M.; Selcuki M.Local anesthetics are used clinically for peripheral nerve blocks, epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia and pain management; large concentrations, continuous application and long exposure time can cause neurotoxicity. The mechanism of neurotoxicity caused by local anesthetics is unclear. Neurite outgrowth and apoptosis can be used to evaluate neurotoxic effects. Mouse neuroblastoma cells were induced to differentiate and generate neurites in the presence of local anesthetics. The culture medium was removed and replaced with serum-free medium plus 20 μl combinations of epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor containing tetracaine, prilocaine, lidocaine or procaine at concentrations of 1, 10, 25, or 100 μl prior to neurite measurement. Cell viability, iNOS, eNOS and apoptosis were evaluated. Local anesthetics produced toxic effects by neurite inhibition at low concentrations and by apoptosis at high concentrations. There was an inverse relation between local anesthetic concentrations and cell viability. Comparison of different local anesthetics showed toxicity, as assessed by cell viability and apoptotic potency, in the following order: tetracaine > prilocaine > lidocaine > procaine. Procaine was the least neurotoxic local anesthetic and because it is short-acting, may be preferred for pain prevention during short procedures. © 2015 The Biological Stain Commission.Item Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block: Postoperative analgesia in children with spinal dysraphism(Saudi Arabian Armed Forces Hospital, 2018) Çevikkalp E.; Erbüyün K.; Erbüyün S.C.; Ok G.Pediatric regional anesthesia is widely used to relieve postoperative pain after abdominal surgery. Commonly used techniques of regional anesthesia include lumbar epidural and caudal block. However, the use of central neuraxial blockade has limitations. It is contraindicated in patients with clotting abnormalities, spinal dysraphism with tethered cord syndrome, meningomyelocele, and following spinal surgery with instrumentation. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block is a new method of regional anesthesia that can be used in settings where central neuraxial blockade is contraindicated. In this study, we present 5 pediatric cases in which major abdominal surgery was performed but central neuraxial blockade could not be carried out due to spinal abnormalities. © 2018, Saudi Arabian Armed Forces Hospital. All rights reserved.Item A comparison of the effects of thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block in postoperative acute pain in spinal surgery(Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2024) Dilsiz P.; Sari S.; Tan K.B.; Demircioğlu M.; Topçu İ.; Erel V.K.; Aydin O.N.; Turgut M.Purpose: Spinal surgeries are a very painful procedure. New regional techniques for postoperative pain management are being considered. The present study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block would lead to lower opioid consumption compared to the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block after lumbar disk surgery. The study's primary objective was to compare postoperative total opioid consumption, and the secondary objective was to assess postoperative pain scores. Methods: Sixty-eight patients who underwent elective lumbar disk surgery were randomly assigned to either the ESP block group or the TLIP block group. The current pain status of the patients in both the ESP and TLIP block groups was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at specific time intervals (30 min, 1, 6, 12 and 24 h) during the postoperative period. The number of times patients administered a bolus dose of patient-controlled analgesia, (PCA) within the first 24 h was recorded. Results: In the ESP group, the total opioid consumption in terms of morphine equivalents was found to be significantly lower (ESP group: 7.7 ± 7.0; TLIP group: 13.0 ± 10.1; p < 0.05). The NRS scores were similar between the groups at 30 min, 1, 6, and 12 h, but at 24 h, they were significantly lower in the ESP group. Moreover, the groups had no significant difference regarding observed side effects. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the analgesic efficacy of both techniques, revealing that the ESP block provides more effective analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar disk surgery. © The Author(s) 2024.