Browsing by Subject "Inhalation Spacers"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Improved efficacy of aerosol delivery to distal airways in pediatric subjects using a new spacer mouth-mask(2007) Yüksel H.; Berardino L.; Yüksel D.; Yilmaz Ö.; Burak Z.Aerosol nebulization is one of the safest and most effective ways of treating airway diseases especially in children. Failure of inhaled asthma treatment is mainly due to inadequate deposition of drugs in the peripheral area of the lungs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a traditional mask and that of a new spacer mouth-mask (Nebula, Markos Mefar, Italy) when used with a jet nebulizer, by measuring aerosol deposition in the lungs, oropharynx, upper airways, and gastrointestinal tract. Twelve children without respiratory disease aged between 8 and 13 years were included in the study. Aerosol inhalation was performed using a jet nebulizer with 2 mL of saline solution containing 20 Mci of Tc99m-DTPA. The first group initially performed aerosol inhalation using a traditional facemask and then, one week later, using the new spacer mouth-mask. The second group performed aerosol inhalation using the new spacer mouth-mask first and then, one week later, using a traditional mask. Scintigraphic ventilation images ware then obtained, and aerosol deposition in the trachea, oropharynx, lungs and stomach was measured. In the first group, the radioaerosol deposition in the peripheral lung area using the new spacer mouth-mask was greater 97.8±7.0 vs 68.5*7.9 (p=0.04). On the other hand, the oropharyngeal radioaerosol deposition was greater using the traditional mask: 50.2±5.2 vs 20.3±11.8 (p = 0.028). Similarly, in the second group the peripheral lung deposition was greater and the oropharyngeal deposition was less using the new spacer mouth-mask: 97.3±9.4 vs 70.2*11.2 and 20.7 ± 8.9 vs 46.3±16.8 (p=0.028 and 0.046 respectively). In conclusion, the new design of the spacer mouth-mask allows greater aerosol deposition in the peripheral lung area and less in other parts such as the oropharyngeal area, the central airways and the stomach.Item Metered dose inhaler-spacer use education effects on achieve asthma control in children; [Ölçülü doz inhaler-spacer kullanımı eğitiminin çocuklarda astım kontrolü sağlanmasındaki etkileri](Ankara University, 2016) Türkelı A.; Yilmaz Ö.; Yüksel H.Introduction: Improper Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)-spacer use technique can result in less than optimal delivery of medicine to the lungs and poor asthma outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of standardized education on proper MDIspacer use and asthma control in children with asthma and to identify the factors associated with these results. Materials and Methods: This is a cohort study that evaluated the influence of standardized education about MDI-Spacer device use on asthma control in children. Asthmatic children using MDI-Spacer device and their parents were enrolled in this study. Children were followed up for two months after standardized education and the change in asthma control was recorded. Results: Thirty eight children (14 females and 24 males) aged between 2.5 and 13 years were enrolled in the study. Mean age of the children was 7.5 ± 2.8 years. Six patients were lost to follow up and thirty two patients completed the study. Mean inhalation technique score was 4.9 ± 1.3 before education and increased significantly to 7.8 ± 0.4 after education (p< 0.001). Mean Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score decreased significantly with education (0.77 ± 0.9 vs 0.1 ± 0.1 respectively, p< 0.001). Similarly, mean asthma symptom score (ASS) decreased significantly from 4.3 ± 3.6 to 0.2 ± 0.7 with education (p< 0.001). Most common mistake in use of MDI-Spacer device use was detected to be lack of mouth rinsing after use before education in 78.9% of the patients. Conclusion: Providing standardized education about MDI-Spacer device use to children and parents leads to correct MDI-Spacer device use and is associated with improvement in asthma symptom score and asthma control. © 2016, Ankara University. All rights reserved.