Browsing by Subject "flexible bronchoscopy"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Effects of low-dose propofol vs ketamine on emergence cough in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy with sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial(Elsevier Inc., 2016) Ozturk T.; Acıkel A.; Yılmaz O.; Topçu I.; Çevıkkalp E.; Yuksel H.Study Objective To determine the effects of low-dose ketamine and propofol on cough during emergence and the recovery period when administered at emergence in children undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy for bronchoalveolar lavage (FOBL) with sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia. Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting Operating room, postoperative recovery area. Patients Sixty-eight children aged 1 to 8 years old undergoing elective diagnostic FOBL. Interventions After discontinuation of anesthetics at the end of FOBL, patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: in group K, children were administered 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine; in group P, 0.5 mg/kg of propofol; and in group C, 0.1 mL/kg of normal saline. Measurements Anesthesia time, procedure time, emergence time, and recovery time were recorded. Coughing and delirium scores were recorded as the patient fully emerged from anesthesia (time 0) and 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes later. Main Results The percentage of children with moderate or severe cough during emergence was similar in all groups. Mean delirium scores at emergence (T0) were significantly lower in group K than those in group P and in group C (P =0001 and P =02). Mean delirium score at 5 minutes in group K (6 [5-10]) was significantly lower than that of group C (P =02) and similar to that of group P. The recovery time of group K was significantly longer than that of group C and group P (P =01 and P =03, respectively). Conclusions Ketamine or propofol given at the end of sevoflurane-remifentanil general anesthesia in children undergoing FOBL did not decrease cough more than normal saline during the emergence period. Ketamine and propofol, compared to normal saline, had a beneficial effect on decreasing the incidence of emergence delirium. Ketamine lengthened recovery time. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.Item Two different methods of lidocaine inhalation before diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy: Effects on post-bronchoscopy respiratory symptoms(Turkiye Klinikleri, 2021) Yüksel H.; Yaşar A.; Açikel A.; Topçu İ.; Yilmaz Ö.Background/aim: Use of topical anesthesia before flexible bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the upper airways prevents cough and stridor during and after the procedure while reducing the need for sedation. In practice, lidocaine is the medication of choice before bronchoscopy. There various types of nebulizers used for inhalation treatments. In this study, we compared the respiratory tract symptoms after flexible bronchoscopy between children who received pre-procedure topical lidocaine with mesh or jet nebulizers. Materials and methods: We enrolled 4–18 years old subjects that underwent flexible bronchoscopy due to treatment-resistant asthma in this retrospective case-control study. Twenty subjects received topical lidocaine with jet nebulizers while 20 received it with mesh nebulizers. Age, sex, duration of bronchoscopy, duration of anesthesia, time to awaken, and time to recovery were recorded as well as cough and laryngospasm scores after flexible bronchoscopy. Results: Severe cough after flexible bronchoscopy was not encountered in the mesh nebulizers group but was seen in 10% of the jet nebulizers group (p = 0.027). On the other hand, age, sex, duration of bronchoscopy, duration of anesthesia, time to awaken, and time to recovery were not significantly different between the mesh and jet nebulizer groups (p = 0.44, 0.34, 0.51, 0.88, 0.88, and 0.22, respectively). Moreover, croup and laryngospasm scores between the two groups were similar (p = 0.62, 0.50 respectively). Cough score was significantly worse jet nebulizers group (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Topical lidocaine application with mesh nebulizers decreases the most common complication, cough, after flexible bronchoscopy in children more effectively compare to jet nebulizers. Thus, mesh nebulizers may be a faster way of nebulization before flexible bronchoscopy as an alternative to jet nebulizers. © 2021, Turkiye Klinikleri. All rights reserved.Item A view on pediatric airway management: a cross sectional survey study(Edizioni Minerva Medica, 2022) Saracoglu A.; Saracoglu K.T.; Sorbello M.; Kurdi R.; Greif R.; Abitagaoglu S.; Akin M.; Aksu A.; Aladag E.; Alagoz A.; Alanoglu Z.; Alicikus Tuncel Z.; Altinisik H.B.; Ambrosoli A.L.; Amella S.; Andrašovský A.; Andreotti A.; Arici A.G.; Armstrong J.; Arslan B.; Ávila E.; Aydogmus I.; Ayhan A.; Ayoglu H.; Ayvat P.; Bakis M.; Basaran B.; Baytar C.; Begec Z.; Belete A.; Belludi R.; Bianco M.C.; Bilgin M.U.; Biricik E.; Brueggeney M.K.; Bunjaku D.; Buyukkocak U.; Catineau J.; Cebrián C.G.; Chinnappa S.M.; Cicekci A.; Corte-Ballester J.; Cuéllar Martínez A.B.; Caglar T.; Calisir F.; Cokay Abut Y.; Delen L.A.; Deligoz O.; Demirgan S.; Distefano R.; Dmytriiev D.; Duarte L.; Ece C.; El-Tahan M.; El-Hatib M.; Erdogan Ari D.; Erkalp K.; Erol D.; Erturk E.; Frada R.; Fuchs A.; Garini E.; Gecici M.E.; Giallongo M.; Gomes C.; Gurbuz H.; Has Selmi N.; Hasani A.; Hernandez Cera C.; Hilker T.; Horatanaruang D.; Huitink J.; Karaaslan P.; Karaveli A.; Karisik M.; Kavas A.D.; Kaya A.; Kendigelen P.; Kilinc G.; Koc S.; Dilmen O.; Kozanhan B.; Kupeli I.; Kuyrukluyildiz U.; Lleshi A.; Loizou M.; Luanpholcharoenchai J.; Martinez V.; Matoshi D.; Maurya I.; Meco B.C.; Michalek P.; Milic M.; Mitre I.; Montealegre F.; Nair A.; Nallbani R.; Ng A.; Oc B.; Ok G.; Olguner C.; Ozkan D.; Oksuz G.; Ozcan M.S.; Ozden E.S.; Ozden Omaygenc D.; Ozer Y.; Ozmenoglu Turker H.; Ozmert S.; Rai E.; Rangappa D.; Roca De Togores A.; Salgado H.; Santos P.; Sari S.; Saritas A.; Saygi Emir N.; Sen B.; Shallik N.; Shamim F.; Shirgoska B.; Silay E.; Sinha T.; Srimueang T.; Sudarshan P.; Sugur T.; Sumer I.; Szucs Z.; Sahin T.; Sanal Bas S.; Tan J.; Tawfik L.; Topal S.; Toy E.; Turan Civraz A.Z.; Unal D.; Ural S.G.; Ustalar Ozgen S.Z.; Uysal H.; Yesildal H.; Yilmaz C.; Yuen V.; Yurt E.; Yuzkat N.; Zdravkovic M.; Isohanni M.BACKGROUND: This survey aimed to investigate routine practices and approaches of clinicians on pediatric airway in anesthesia and intensive care medicine. METHODS: A 20-question multiple-choice questionnaire with the possibility to provide open text answers was developed and sent. The survey was sent to the members of European Airway Management Society via a web-based platform. Responses were analyzed thematically. Only the answers from one representative of the pediatric service of each hospital was included into the analysis. RESULTS: Among the members, 143 physicians responded the survey, being anesthesiologists (83.2%), intensivists (11.9%), emergency medicine physicians (2.1%), and (2.8%) pain medicine practitioners. Astraight blade was preferred by 115 participants (80.4%) in newborns, whereas in infants 86 (60.1%) indicated a curved blade and 55 (38.5%) a straight blade. Uncuffed tracheal tube were preferred by 115 participants (80.4%) in newborns, whereas 24 (16.8%) used cuffed tubes. Approximately 2/3 of the participants (89, 62.2%) reported not to use routinely a cuff manometer in their clinical practice, whereas 54 participants (37.8%) use it routinely in pediatric patients. Direct laryngoscopy for routine pediatric tracheal intubation was reported by 127 participants (88.8%), while 16 (11.2%) reported using videolaryngoscopes routinely. Interestingly, 39 (27.3%) had never performed neither videolaryngoscopy nor flexible bronchoscopy in children. These results were significantly less in hospitals with a dedicated pediatric anesthesiologist. CONCLUSIONS: This survey on airway management in pediatric anesthesia revealed that the use of cuffed tubes and the routine monitoring of cuff pressure are rare. In addition, the rate of videolaryngoscopy or flexible optical intubation was low for expected difficult intubation. Our survey highlights the need for properly trained pediatric anesthesiologists working in-line with updated scientific evidence. © 2022 Edizioni Minerva Medica. All rights reserved.