Browsing by Subject "nephrotoxicity"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Recidivans cutaneous leishmaniasis unresponsive to liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisone®)(2000) Gündüz K.; Afsar S.; Ayhan S.; Kandiloglu A.R.; Türel A.; Filiz E.E.; Ok U.Z.A 60-year-old woman with thick crusted erythematous plaques on her glabella, apex nasi and left infraorbital region was diagnosed as recidivans cutaneous leishmaniasis. The lesions were resistant to antimonial drugs. Although some response was observed on the infraorbital region, lesions on the glabella and nose continued to infiltrate despite therapy with liposomal amphotericin B.Item Histopathological and ultrastructural effects of Losartan on embryonic rat kidney(Elsevier GmbH, 2005) Akil I.; Inan S.; Gurcu B.; Nazikoglu A.; Ozbilgin K.; Muftuoglu S.The aim of our study was to investigate the histopathological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural effects of Losartan (a selective angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker) on renal development in rats. Twelve pregnant rats were divided into control and experimental groups. In the experimental group, Losartan (10 mg/kg/day) was given via nasogastric tube, between the sixth day of implantation and time of sacrifice on embryonic days 18 and 20. All formalin-fixed, paraffin wax-embedded renal tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or labelled for binding of primary antibodies against transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β 1,-2,-3) using an avidin-biotin-peroxidase method. For electron microscopic examination, samples were fixed with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide and embedded in araldite. Glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness was measured and compared using an unpaired t-test. Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antagonism by Losartan inhibited renal growth and delayed nephron maturation. Increased immunoreactivity of TGF-β's was observed in developing nephron precursors and interstitial cells in the experimental group. Electron microscopical examination showed that thickening of the GBM was normal in the control group but an irregular thickening was seen in the experimental group (p<0.001). It was also seen that epithelial cells of developing tubules underwent apoptosis in the experimental group. Thus, renal development in rats seems to depend on an intact renin-angiotensin system. © 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.Item Delayed renal excretion of methotrexate after a severe anaphylactic reaction to methotrexate in a child with osteosarcoma(2009) Ozguven A.A.; Uysal K.; Gunes D.; Koroglu T.; Gurcu O.; Olgun N.Although methotrexate is an agent widely used in the practice of pediatric oncology, allergic reactions to methotrexate are most unusual. Most of these reactions typically occur after repeated administration. Here, we report a severe anaphylactoid reaction to the first dose of high-dose methotrexate infusion in a child with osteosarcoma who has also experienced a delayed excretion of methotrexate. Clinicians must be aware of the possibility of a systemic, near-fatal anaphylactic reactions with methotrexate and patients who experience severe anaphylactic reactions should be followed carefully because of the possibility of delayed methotrexate excretion. © 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc.Item Gemcitabine Alone versus combination of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for the Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of multicenter study(SAP - Slovak Academic Press, spol. s.r.o., 2012) Inal A.; Kos F.T.; Algin E.; Yildiz R.; Dikiltas M.; Unek I.T.; Colak D.; Elkiran E.T.; Helvaci K.; Geredeli C.; Dane F.; Balakan O.; Kaplan M.A.; Durnali A.G.; Harputoglu H.; Goksel G.; Ozdemir N.; Buyukberber S.; Gumus M.; Kucukoner M.; Ozkan M.; Uncu D.; Benekli M.; Isikdogan A.The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer is of advanced disease. Several randomized Phase II and III trials suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) response rates were higher than Gemcitabine (Gem) alone, however the trials were not enough powered to indicate a statistically significant prolongation of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study is to evaluated the efficiency of Gem alone versus GemCis in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A total of 406 patients, from fourteen centers were evaluated retrospectively. All patients received Gem or GemCis as first-line treatment between September 2005 to March 2011. Primary end of this study were to evaluate the toxicity, clinical response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the arms. There were 156 patients (M: 98, F: 58) in Gem arm and 250 patients (M: 175, F: 75) in the combination arm. Gemcitabin arm patients older than the combination arm (median 63 vs 57.5, p=0.001). In patients with the combination arm had a higher dose reduction (25.2% vs 11.3%, p=0.001) and dose delay (34% vs 16.8%, p=0.001). Among patients with the combination and Gemcitabin arm gender, diabetes mellitus, performance status, cholestasis, grade, stage did not have a statistically difference (p>0.05). Clinical response rate to the combination arm was higher than the Gem arm (69.0% vs 49.7%, p=0.001). PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance (8.9 vs 6.0, p=0.08). OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm (12.0 vs 10.2, p>0.05). Grade III-IV hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were higher in the combination arm. PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance. OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm.Item Colistin efficacy in the treatment of multidrug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections(Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 2016) Çetin Ç.B.; Özer Türk D.; Şenol Ş.; Dinç Horasan G.; Tünger Ö.Background/aim: Colistin is used as a salvage therapy for multidrug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Our aim was to evaluate colistin efficiency and toxicity in the treatment of these resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study carried out in a tertiary care hospital during 2011–2013. Study data were collected from the medical records and consultations of the infectious diseases clinic. Results: The study group included 158 patients with nosocomial infections and 136 (86.1%) of them were hospitalized in the ICU. Respiratory tract infections were the most commonly observed ones (n = 103, 65.2%). The most frequently isolated microorganism was Acinetobacter baumannii (72.2%). A total of 98 (62.0%) patients had clinical cure. There was no statistically significant difference between monotherapy (n = 3/6, 50.0%) and combination therapies (n = 95/152, 62.5%) according to clinical response. Underlying ultimately fatal disease, previous renal disease, and total parenteral nutrition were independent risk factors for poor clinical response. Nephrotoxicity developed in 80 (50.6%) patients and clinical cure was statistically unrelated with nephrotoxicity. Conclusion: Colistin may be used as an effective agent for multidrug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections with close monitoring of renal functions, especially for older and critically ill patients. © TÜBİTAK.Item Is eribulin treatment prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with this drug? Retrospective analysis of a multicentre study(Zerbinis Publications, 2019) Oruc Z.; Kaplan M.A.; Geredeli C.; Sari N.Y.; Ozaslan E.; Aytekin A.; Elkiran E.T.; Koca S.; Dogan M.; Turan N.; Yuce O.; Sevinc A.; Ercelep O.; Isikdogan A.Purpose: This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors for survival and the reliability and the effectiveness of eribulin therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Methods: A total of 80 patients treated with eribulin in 12 medical oncology centers in Turkey between 2013-2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen potential prognostic variables were assessed for analysis. Results: The patients had received a median of 5 prior chemotherapy regimens and a median of 3 eribulin cycles for MBC. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% Cl: 4.1-7.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95 % Cl: 6-15). Multivariate analysis showed that eribulin treatment line was shown to have independent prognostic significance for PFS. PFS difference was demostrated in patients who received 3 chemotherapy lines for advanced disease compared to those who had more than 3 chemotherapy lines [median PFS; 3 lines: 8.6 months (6.2-11) and >3 lines: 4.6 months (3.7-4.6) p=0.00]. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 52.5 and 35% in patients treated with three lines and with >3 previous chemotherapeutic regimens. Most common toxicities were neutropenia (62.5%), fatigue (52.5%), alopecia (50%) and nausea (37.5%). Conclusions: Eribulin treatment line was identified as in-depedent prognostic factor for PFS in MBC patients. © 2019 Zerbinis Publications. All rights reserved.Item Is eribulin treatment prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with this drug? Retrospective analysis of a multicentre study(Zerbinis Publications, 2020) Oruc Z.; Kaplan M.A.; Geredeli C.; Sari N.Y.; Ozaslan E.; Aytekin A.; Elkiran E.T.; Koca S.; Dogan M.; Turan N.; Yuce O.; Sevinc A.; Ercelep O.; Isikdogan A.Purpose: This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors for survival and the reliability and the effectiveness of eribulin therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Methods: A total of 80 patients treated with eribulin in 12 medical oncology centers in Turkey between 2013-2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen potential prognostic variables were assessed for analysis. Results: The patients had received a median of 5 prior chemotherapy regimens and a median of 3 eribulin cycles for MBC. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% Cl: 4.1-7.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95 % Cl: 6-15). Multivariate analysis showed that eribulin treatment line was shown to have independent prognostic significance for PFS. PFS difference was demostrated in patients who received 3 chemotherapy lines for advanced disease compared to those who had more than 3 chemotherapy lines [median PFS; 3 lines: 8.6 months (6.2-11) and >3 lines: 4.6 months (3.7-4.6) p=0.00]. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 52.5 and 35% in patients treated with three lines and with >3 previous chemotherapeutic regimens. Most common toxicities were neutropenia (62.5%), fatigue (52.5%), alopecia (50%) and nausea (37.5%). Conclusions: Eribulin treatment line was identified as indepedent prognostic factor for PFS in MBC patients. © 2020 Zerbinis Publications. All rights reserved.Item Cross-sectional study: Long term follow-up care for pediatric cancer survivors in a developing country, turkey: Current status, challenges, and future perspectives(Turkiye Klinikleri, 2020) İncesoy Özdemir S.; Taçyildiz N.; Varan A.; Kebudi R.; Zülfikar B.; Celkan T.; Şahin G.; Çorapçioğlu F.; Keskin Yildirim Z.; Pinarli F.G.; Olgun N.; Sari N.; Dağdemir A.; Özyörük D.; Eren T.; Çakir F.B.; Adakli Aksoy B.; Bozkurt C.; Güler E.; Özgüven A.A.; Erbey F.; Berber M.; Dinçaslan H.; Ünal E.; Kantar M.Aim: The main purpose of this study is to determine the current status of long-term follow-up (LTFU) for childhood cancer survivors and the challenges of LTFU for pediatric cancer survivors at pediatric oncology institutions in Turkey. Material and methods: A questionnaire was e-mailed to the directors of 33 pediatric oncology centers (POCs) registered in the Turkish Pediatric Oncology Group (TPOG). Of these 33 active TPOG institutions, 21 participated in the study and returned their completed questionnaires. Results: Only 1 of the 21 participating centers had a separate LTFU clinic. The remaining centers provided LTFU care for childhood cancer survivors at the pediatric oncology outpatient clinic. Of these centers, 17 (80.9%) reported difficulty in transition from the pediatric clinic to the adult clinic, 14 (66.6%) reported insufficient care providers, and 12 (57.1%) reported insufficient time and transportation problems. As neglected late effects, 16 (76.1%) centers reported psychosocial and getty job problems and 11 (52.3%) reported sexual and cognitive problems. None of the centers had their own LTFU guidelines for their daily LTFU practice. Conclusion: This study was the first to gain an overview of the needs of POCs and the gaps in survivorship services in Turkey. The results from this study will help to develop a national health care system and national guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors. © TÜBİTAK.Item The association of antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity: The retrospective analysis of a nationwide COVID-19 cohort(Frontiers Media S.A., 2022) Babayigit C.; Kokturk N.; Kul S.; Cetinkaya P.D.; Atis Nayci S.; Argun Baris S.; Karcioglu O.; Aysert P.; Irmak I.; Akbas Yuksel A.; Sekibag Y.; Baydar Toprak O.; Azak E.; Mulamahmutoglu S.; Cuhadaroglu C.; Demirel A.; Kerget B.; Baran Ketencioglu B.; Ozger H.S.; Ozkan G.; Ture Z.; Ergan B.; Avkan Oguz V.; Kilinc O.; Ercelik M.; Ulukavak Ciftci T.; Alici O.; Nurlu Temel E.; Ataoglu O.; Aydin A.; Cetiner Bahcetepe D.; Gullu Y.T.; Fakili F.; Deveci F.; Kose N.; Tor M.M.; Gunluoglu G.; Altin S.; Turgut T.; Tuna T.; Ozturk O.; Dikensoy O.; Yildiz Gulhan P.; Basyigit I.; Boyaci H.; Oguzulgen I.K.; Borekci S.; Gemicioglu B.; Bayraktar F.; Elbek O.; Hanta I.; Kuzu Okur H.; Sagcan G.; Uzun O.; Akgun M.; Altinisik G.; Dursun B.; Cakir Edis E.; Gulhan E.; Oner Eyuboglu F.; Gultekin O.; Havlucu Y.; Ozkan M.; Sakar Coskun A.; Sayiner A.; Kalyoncu A.F.; Itil O.; Bayram H.Background and objectives: Although several repurposed antiviral drugs have been used for the treatment of COVID-19, only a few such as remdesivir and molnupiravir have shown promising effects. The objectives of our study were to investigate the association of repurposed antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity. Methods: Patients admitted to 26 different hospitals located in 16 different provinces between March 11–July 18, 2020, were enrolled. Case definition was based on WHO criteria. Patients were managed according to the guidelines by Scientific Board of Ministry of Health of Turkey. Primary outcomes were length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and intubation. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 1,472 COVID-19 adult patients; 57.1% were men (mean age = 51.9 ± 17.7years). A total of 210 (14.3%) had severe pneumonia, 115 (7.8%) were admitted to ICUs, and 69 (4.7%) were intubated during hospitalization. The median (interquartile range) of duration of hospitalization, including ICU admission, was 7 (5–12) days. Favipiravir (n = 328), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 55), and oseltamivir (n = 761) were administered as antiviral agents, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, n = 1,382) and azithromycin (n = 738) were used for their immunomodulatory activity. Lopinavir/ritonavir (β [95% CI]: 4.71 [2.31–7.11]; p = 0.001), favipiravir (β [95% CI]: 3.55 [2.56–4.55]; p = 0.001) and HCQ (β [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.02–1.67]; p = 0.046) were associated with increased risk of lengthy hospital stays. Furthermore, favipiravir was associated with increased risks of ICU admission (OR [95% CI]: 3.02 [1.70–5.35]; p = 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (OR [95% CI]: 2.94 [1.28–6.75]; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that antiviral drugs including lopinavir, ritonavir, and favipiravir were associated with negative clinical outcomes such as increased risks for lengthy hospital stay, ICU admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. Therefore, repurposing such agents without proven clinical evidence might not be the best approach for COVID-19 treatment. Copyright © 2022 Babayigit, Kokturk, Kul, Cetinkaya, Atis Nayci, Argun Baris, Karcioglu, Aysert, Irmak, Akbas Yuksel, Sekibag, Baydar Toprak, Azak, Mulamahmutoglu, Cuhadaroglu, Demirel, Kerget, Baran Ketencioglu, Ozger, Ozkan, Ture, Ergan, Avkan Oguz, Kilinc, Ercelik, Ulukavak Ciftci, Alici, Nurlu Temel, Ataoglu, Aydin, Cetiner Bahcetepe, Gullu, Fakili, Deveci, Kose, Tor, Gunluoglu, Altin, Turgut, Tuna, Ozturk, Dikensoy, Yildiz Gulhan, Basyigit, Boyaci, Oguzulgen, Borekci, Gemicioglu, Bayraktar, Elbek, Hanta, Kuzu Okur, Sagcan, Uzun, Akgun, Altinisik, Dursun, Cakir Edis, Gulhan, Oner Eyuboglu, Gultekin, Havlucu, Ozkan, Sakar Coskun, Sayiner, Kalyoncu, Itil and Bayram.