Validity and reliability of the QIDS-SR16-Turkish in comparison with BDI-IITurkish among young outpatient sample of Turkish University students; [Hızlı Depresif Belirti Envanteri-Özbildirim Formu'nun (HDBE 16 -ÖF) Beck Depresyon Envanteri-II ile Karşılaştırılarak Ayaktan Başvuran Hastalarda Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliǧi]

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMergen H.
dc.contributor.authorTavli T.
dc.contributor.authorÖngel K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:19:46Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:19:46Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of 16-item self-report version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) scale in comparison with BDI-II-Turkish (BDI-II-T) in a young sample of Turkish university students. Methods: A slightly modified version of the QIDS-SR16-Turkish (QIDS-SR16-T) available at www.ids-qids.org, along with the BDI-II-T, was administered to 628 young Turkish university students who attended the Family Health Center in Uludaǧ University Campus between February and April 2010. Descriptive analyses, Student's t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and confirmatory factor analyses were used in the study. Results: The mean age of the participants was 21.1±2.16 (SD) years; 67.8% were female and 32.2% were male. Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency of the QIDS-SR16-T was found to be 0.769. The mean item-total correlation was 0.45, ranging from 0.29 to 0.71. The correlation between the BDI-II-T and QIDS-SR16-T was 0.72. ROC curve analysis suggested 9 as the optimal cut-off for a clinical depression level for the QIDS-SR16-T. Conclusion: We observed that the QIDS-SR16-T demonstrated good psychometric properties in a sample of young Turkish students and has convergent validity with the BDI-II-T, a widely used scale for depression. It is essential to diagnose reliably the major depressive disorder and to follow up the patients by valid screening instruments in primary care setting. The internal consistencies of the QIDS determined in studies from the United States were greater than our Cronbach's α coefficient, but there was no statistically significant difference between them (z=0.55, p>0.05). The QIDS-SR16-T can be reliably used in primary care settings. © Archives of Neuropsychiatry, published by Galenos Publishing.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.4274/npa.y5935
dc.identifier.issn13000667
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/17839
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherTurkish Neuropsychiatric Society
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectBeck Depression Inventory
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdisease classification
dc.subjectdisease severity
dc.subjectfamily history
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinstrument validation
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectmajor depression
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectoutpatient care
dc.subjectprediction
dc.subjectpsychological rating scale
dc.subjectpsychometry
dc.subjectQuick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Scale
dc.subjectreliability
dc.subjectscreening test
dc.subjectself report
dc.subjectstudent attitude
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)
dc.subjectuniversity student
dc.subjectvalidity
dc.titleValidity and reliability of the QIDS-SR16-Turkish in comparison with BDI-IITurkish among young outpatient sample of Turkish University students; [Hızlı Depresif Belirti Envanteri-Özbildirim Formu'nun (HDBE 16 -ÖF) Beck Depresyon Envanteri-II ile Karşılaştırılarak Ayaktan Başvuran Hastalarda Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliǧi]
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Scopus Koleksiyonu