Comparison of patient satisfaction between general and spinal anaesthesia in emergency caesarean deliveries; [Acil sezaryen operasyonlarında genel ve spinal anestezinin hasta memnuniyeti yönünden karşılaştırılması]

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAçıkel A.
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk T.
dc.contributor.authorGöker A.
dc.contributor.authorHayran G.G.
dc.contributor.authorKeleş G.T.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:10:59Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:10:59Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: Obstetric anaesthesia aims to deliver a healthy baby as well as render a comfortable operation for the mother. This study compared general and spinal anaesthesia in terms of the quality of recovery and patient satisfaction in women undergoing emergency caesarean deliveries. Methods: In total, 100 patients were enrolled in this prospective, single-blind, cross-sectional clinical study. Patients were divided into spinal (n=50) and general (n=50) anaesthesia groups. The recovery score, pain and satisfaction were evaluated by Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-40), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 24 hours postoperatively. Results: The total QoR-40 scores were significantly higher and the total operation time was longer in the spinal anaesthesia group (median score: 194.5 vs. 179.0, p<0.001 and mean±SD: 69.0±13.3 vs. 62.7±13.4 minutes, p=0.02, respectively). There was no significant difference in VAS and NRS scores between the groups. Conclusion: Both spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia have advantages and disadvantages in terms of emergency caesarean deliveries. Spinal anaesthesia speeds up the recovery time and enables the mother to return to normal life earlier, while general anaesthesia has a short initiation time and does not affect patient satisfaction. © 2017 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.5152/TJAR.2017.38159
dc.identifier.issn13040871
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/15469
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherAVES Ibrahim Kara
dc.rightsAll Open Access; Bronze Open Access; Green Open Access
dc.subjectcesarean section
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectemergency
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgeneral anesthesia
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectnumeric rating scale
dc.subjectoperation duration
dc.subjectpatient satisfaction
dc.subjectremission
dc.subjectsingle blind procedure
dc.subjectspinal anesthesia
dc.subjectvelocity
dc.subjectvisual analog scale
dc.subjectvisually impaired person
dc.titleComparison of patient satisfaction between general and spinal anaesthesia in emergency caesarean deliveries; [Acil sezaryen operasyonlarında genel ve spinal anestezinin hasta memnuniyeti yönünden karşılaştırılması]
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Scopus Koleksiyonu