Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion
dc.contributor.author | Erkan S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rivera Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mehbod A.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Transfeldt E.E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-22T08:21:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-22T08:21:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background context: Multilevel lumbar disc disease (MLDD) is a common finding in many patients. Surgical solutions for MLDD include fusion or disc replacement. The hybrid model, combining fusion and disc replacement, is a potential alternative for patients who require surgical intervention at both L5-S1 and L4-L5. The indications for this hybrid model could be posterior element insufficiency, severe facet pathology, calcified ligamentum flavum, and subarticular disease confirming spinal stenosis at L5-S1 level, or previous fusion surgery at L5-S1 and new symptomatic pathology at L4-L5. Biomechanical data of the hybrid model with the Maverick disc and anterior fusion are not available in the literature. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical properties of a two-level Maverick disc replacement at L4-L5, L5-S1, and a hybrid model consisting of an L4-L5 Maverick disc replacement with an L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion using multidirectional flexibility test. Study design: An in vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study. Methods: Six fresh human cadaveric lumbar specimens (L4-S1) were subjected to unconstrained load in axial torsion (AT), lateral bending (LB), flexion (F), extension (E), and flexion-extension (FE) using multidirectional flexibility test. Four surgical treatments-intact, one-level Maverick at L5-S1, two-level Maverick between L4 and S1, and the hybrid model (anterior fusion at L5-S1 and Maverick at L4-L5) were tested in sequential order. The range of motion of each treatment was calculated. Results: The Maverick disc replacement slightly reduced intact motion in AT and LB at both levels. The total FE motion was similar to the intact motion. However, the E motion is significantly increased (approximately 50% higher) and F motion is significantly decreased (30%-50% lower). The anterior fusion using a cage and anterior plate significantly reduced spinal motion compared with the condition (p<.05). No significant differences were found between two-level Maverick disc prosthesis and the hybrid model in terms of all motion types at L4-L5 level (p>.05). Conclusion: The Maverick disc preserved total motion but altered the motion pattern of the intact condition. This result is similar to unconstrained devices such as Charité. The motion at L4-L5 of the hybrid model is similar to that of two-level Maverick disc replacement. The fusion procedure using an anterior plate significantly reduced intact motion. Clinical studies are recommended to validate the efficacy of the hybrid model. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
dc.identifier.DOI-ID | 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 15299430 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/18653 | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.subject | Adult | |
dc.subject | Arthroplasty, Replacement | |
dc.subject | Biomechanics | |
dc.subject | Cadaver | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Intervertebral Disk | |
dc.subject | Lumbar Vertebrae | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | Range of Motion, Articular | |
dc.subject | Spinal Fusion | |
dc.subject | article | |
dc.subject | biomechanics | |
dc.subject | cadaver | |
dc.subject | controlled study | |
dc.subject | experimental model | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | hybrid | |
dc.subject | in vitro study | |
dc.subject | intermethod comparison | |
dc.subject | joint prosthesis | |
dc.subject | lumbar disk | |
dc.subject | multilevel lumbar disc disease | |
dc.subject | priority journal | |
dc.subject | range of motion | |
dc.subject | spine disease | |
dc.subject | spine fusion | |
dc.subject | surgical technique | |
dc.subject | vertebral canal stenosis | |
dc.title | Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion | |
dc.type | Article |