Comparison of interface pressures on three operating table support surfaces during surgery

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAslan Basli A.
dc.contributor.authorYavuz Van Giersbergen M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:05:39Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:05:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAim of the study: To investigate the effect of support surface usage and positions on interface pressure during surgery. Materials and methods: This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2019. The study included patients who had planned surgery in supine and prone positions. The sample size was 72 patients. Patients were assigned to three groups (gel support surface, viscoelastic support surface and standard operating table) according to the determined randomization table. During the surgery, the pressure in the patients' body was recorded. The statistics program IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 packaged software was used in the analyses of data. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the total body average interface pressure (mmHg) values between the supporting surfaces in the prone position. There was a statistically significant difference between the total body average interface pressure (mmHg) values between the support surfaces in the supine position, and the average interface pressure measured on the viscoelastic foam support surface was significantly lower than the gel support surface and the standard operating table. Conclusion: In the study, the use of viscoelastic foam support surface was found to be more effective than the use of a standard operating table and gel support surface. Viscoelastic foam support surface is recommended for patients at risk for pressure injury in the operating room. © 2021 Tissue Viability Society
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1016/j.jtv.2021.04.006
dc.identifier.issn0965206X
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/13218
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherTissue Viability Society
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOperating Rooms
dc.subjectOperating Tables
dc.subjectPatient Positioning
dc.subjectPressure
dc.subjectPressure Ulcer
dc.subjectProne Position
dc.subjectantiinfective agent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBraden Scale
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdecubitus
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthypotension
dc.subjecthypothermia
dc.subjectinterface pressure
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectoperating room personnel
dc.subjectoperation duration
dc.subjectperioperative period
dc.subjectpressure measurement
dc.subjectprone position
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectsupine position
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjectsurgery
dc.subjectviscoelasticity
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadverse event
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectdecubitus
dc.subjectdevices
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectoperating room
dc.subjectoperating table
dc.subjectorganization and management
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectpatient positioning
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectpressure
dc.titleComparison of interface pressures on three operating table support surfaces during surgery
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Scopus Koleksiyonu