Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVahip S.
dc.contributor.authorAydemir Ö.
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya C.
dc.contributor.authorAltinbaş K.
dc.contributor.authorKora K.
dc.contributor.authorSücüllüoğlu Dikici D.
dc.contributor.authorAkdeniz F.
dc.contributor.authorKalayci F.
dc.contributor.authorOral E.T.
dc.contributor.authorVahip I.
dc.contributor.authorAlkan M.
dc.contributor.authorAngst J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:10:37Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:10:37Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised. Method: The study was carried out with 80 patients diagnosed with bipolar I disorder, 26 patients diagnosed with bipolar II disorder and 42 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder attending the out- and in-patient psychiatry departments of three university hospitals and one training hospital and 116 healthy volunteers consisting of university students. Mean duration of illness was 15.1 years for the bipolar disorder group and 9.3 years for the major depressive disorder group. For concurrent validity, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire was used. In the statistical analysis, internal consistency coefficient, item-total score correlation coefficients, exploratory factor analysis, correlation with concurrent scale and ROC curve were calculated. Results: Translation into Turkish and back-translation into English of Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised were performed and thus the semantic harmony of the scale was obtained. In the internal consistency, Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.914 and item-total score correlations were between 0.235-0.743. Unlike the rest, the coefficient of item #23 was found as 0.110. In factor analysis, six factors were obtained; however, a two-factor solution representing 44.5% of the total variance was accepted whereas the first factor represents overactivity and being expansive, where the second factor represents impulsivity and risky behaviors. Correlation of Hypomania Checklist-32-R with Mood Disorder Questionnaire was r=0.379. In the ROC analysis, the cutoffpoint of the scale was calculated as 14 with a sensitivity of 71.0 and specificity of 69.8. The scale discriminates well between the bipolar group, depressive and control groups. Conclusion: Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised developed for screening hypomania is reliable and valid in Turkish after exclusion of item #23.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.5080/u13738
dc.identifier.issn13002163
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/15316
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherTurkish Association of Nervous and Mental Health
dc.rightsAll Open Access; Gold Open Access
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectBipolar Disorder
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectTranslations
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectbipolar disorder
dc.subjectcase control study
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectpsychometry
dc.subjectpublication
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectstandards
dc.subjectturkey (bird)
dc.subjectvalidation study
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.titleReliability and validity study of the Turkish version of Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Scopus Koleksiyonu