The role of ultrasound guidance in pediatric caudal block

dc.contributor.authorErbüyün K.
dc.contributor.authorAçıkgöz B.
dc.contributor.authorOk G.
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz Ö.
dc.contributor.authorTemeltaş G.
dc.contributor.authorTekin İ.
dc.contributor.authorTok D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:12:07Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:12:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the time interval of the procedure, possible complications, post-operative pain levels, additional analgesics, and nurse satisfaction in ultrasonography-guided and standard caudal block applications. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in Celal Bayar University Hospital, Manisa, Turkey, between January and December 2014, included 78 pediatric patients. Caudal block was applied to 2 different groups; one with ultrasound guide, and the other using the standard method. Results: The time interval of the procedure was significantly shorter in the standard application group compared with ultrasound-guided group (p=0.020). Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale values obtained at the 90th minute was statistically lower in the standard application group compared with ultrasound-guided group (p=0.035). No statistically significant difference was found on the other parameters between the 2 groups. The shorter time interval of the procedure at standard application group should not be considered as a distinctive mark by the pediatric anesthesiologists, because this time difference was as short as seconds. Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance for caudal block applications would neither increase nor decrease the success of the treatment. However, ultrasound guidance should be needed in cases where the detection of sacral anatomy is difficult, especially by palpations. © 2016, Saudi Arabian Armed Forces Hospital. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.15537/smj.2016.2.13501
dc.identifier.issn03795284
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/15924
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherSaudi Arabian Armed Forces Hospital
dc.rightsAll Open Access; Gold Open Access
dc.subjectAnalgesics
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Caudal
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectChild, Preschool
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOperative Time
dc.subjectPain, Postoperative
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectSurgery, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectUltrasonography
dc.subjectUrologic Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectanalgesic agent
dc.subjectanatomy
dc.subjectcaudal anesthesia
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectFaces Pain Scale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectpalpation
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectsacral spinal cord
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)
dc.subjectultrasound
dc.subjectuniversity hospital
dc.subjectcase control study
dc.subjectcaudal anesthesia
dc.subjectcomputer assisted surgery
dc.subjectechography
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectoperation duration
dc.subjectPain, Postoperative
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectpreschool child
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjecturologic surgery
dc.titleThe role of ultrasound guidance in pediatric caudal block
dc.typeArticle

Files