Safety and efficacy of panretinal photocoagulation in patients with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy using pattern scan laser versus conventional YAG laser

dc.contributor.authorSeymenoʇlu R.G.
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy M.O.
dc.contributor.authorBaşer E.F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:12:39Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:12:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to compare the results of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) using the pattern scan laser (PASCAL) in a single setting versus multiple sessions of standard YAG laser in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Charts of 35 eyes that were treated with the PASCAL and an equal number of eyes that were treated with conventional laser were retrospectively reviewed. The whole PRP treatment was performed in one session in the PASCAL group, whereas all the patients in the conventional-laser group completed the entire PRP treatment in two or three sessions. Persistence and/or recurrence of neovascularization, complications encountered, total number of laser spots, and mean power used were compared. Patients treated with the PASCAL received significantly higher number of laser spots than those treated with conventional laser (2885 vs. 1642, p < 0.001). The PASCAL and conventional-laser systems required an average power of 650 mW and 330 mW, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients treated with the PASCAL showed similar rates of treatment failure within 12 months of follow-up compared with patients treated with conventional laser (14% vs. 11%, p > 0.05). In the PASCAL group, vitreous hemorrhage, neovascular glaucoma, retinal hemorrhage, and choroidal detachment were reported in two, two, one, and two patients, respectively, whereas only one each vitreous hemorrhage and neovascular glaucoma were encountered in the conventional-laser group. Our study reports that single-session PRP with the PASCAL has similar efficacy compared with conventional laser, and has a favorable side-effect profile. Copyright © 2015, Kaohsiung Medical University. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1016/j.kjms.2015.12.002
dc.identifier.issn1607551X
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/16143
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd
dc.rightsAll Open Access; Gold Open Access
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
dc.subjectDiabetic Retinopathy
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLaser Coagulation
dc.subjectLasers, Solid-State
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectRisk
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectchoroid detachment
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlaser coagulation
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectneodymium YAG laser
dc.subjectneovascular glaucoma
dc.subjectpanretinal photocoagulation
dc.subjectpattern scan laser
dc.subjectproliferative diabetic retinopathy
dc.subjectretina hemorrhage
dc.subjectretina neovascularization
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectsolid state laser
dc.subjecttreatment failure
dc.subjectvitreous hemorrhage
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcomplication
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
dc.subjectdiabetic retinopathy
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectrisk
dc.subjecttherapeutic use
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.titleSafety and efficacy of panretinal photocoagulation in patients with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy using pattern scan laser versus conventional YAG laser
dc.typeArticle

Files